The link in the tweet is a thread unroll from the original poster.At issue was the fact that there was zero evidence supporting the claims in the video, and you continue to offer none.
Then you link a table about hydroxychloroquine but offer no explanation as to why it has merit. Why do you do this?
Did you read links from @basilio - some actual peer reviewed science exists and it does not support the claims made.The link in the tweet is a thread unroll from the original poster.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1283840177497088001.html
Within that thread was several references to HCQ treatments/tests.
Some below.
https://c19study.com/
https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202007.0025/v1
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04358068
Original tweet here.
Balanced overview imo.
Meh... studies don't mean a lot when it might prove trump right apparently.Did you read links from @basilio - some actual peer reviewed science exists and it does not support the claims made.
Here's the latest findings from another peer reviewed study:
"Among patients hospitalized with mild-to-moderate Covid-19, the use of hydroxychloroquine, alone or with azithromycin, did not improve clinical status at 15 days as compared with standard care."As to the table posted above, where is there any explanation?
Australian scientists have savaged the international mess over a study of the drug hydroxychloroquine as a disastrous setback in the search for COVID-19 treatments that will scare off patients and undermine trust in good science.
Discussion, bro. That is the reason for a forum.At issue was the fact that there was zero evidence supporting the claims in the video, and you continue to offer none.
Then you link a table about hydroxychloroquine but offer no explanation as to why it has merit. Why do you do this?
Discussion, bro. That is the reason for a forum.
You put up proven lies, so there's not much left open for discussion.Discussion, bro. That is the reason for a forum.
It was proven false before you posted it, and this is often the case with what you put forward.Then discussion has fulfilled its function.
I post stuff I think might be interesting to discuss. It it proves inaccurate, good, to we all learn something.
A normal flu..not cold..can have the same debilitating effects.This seems at least somewhat concerning given the heart's a rather important bit in the body.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...njury-months-after-recovery-study/5536249002/
Anyone got a credible (medical not political) basis to dispute it?
A normal flu..not cold..can have the same debilitating effects.
https://www.healthline.com/health/heart-disease/viral#types-of-viruses
List of culprits is long ..maybe we should stop the nation, i heard someone caught herpes in qld.
No cure known at all, highly contagious.. let's block the borders
As I see it, the claims being made are that Hydroxychloroquine works if given early (1-5 days) or as a prophylaxis, only. Once the virus has progressed, it effectively useless.Did you read links from @basilio - some actual peer reviewed science exists and it does not support the claims made.
Here's the latest findings from another peer reviewed study:
"Among patients hospitalized with mild-to-moderate Covid-19, the use of hydroxychloroquine, alone or with azithromycin, did not improve clinical status at 15 days as compared with standard care."As to the table posted above, where is there any explanation?
Yes, as it stands we do not know if a large number of potential drug treatments will prove effective. The point I made was that the viral tweet @wayneL posted claimed there was a cure, yet it is widely known by the medical community to be untrue to the extent that responsible social media platforms have deleted it.As I see it, the claims being made are that Hydroxychloroquine works if given early (1-5 days) or as a prophylaxis, only. Once the virus has progressed, it effectively useless.
That's the claim with respect to the country data chart and some of results from studies in this link https://c19study.com/
I have a cousin working on treatments for covid in Melbourne and used the analogy that on face value it's like using a fire extinguisher on a couch fire in a house which is effective, but useless once the whole room is ablaze.
The results from this study early July should give a definitive answer either way.
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04358068
Does seem like a screw loose somewhere.“She’s also made videos saying that doctors make medicine using DNA from aliens and that they’re trying to create a vaccine to make you immune from becoming religious.”
Oh touche, maybe not herpesYep, there are lots of hospitals around the country full of dying herpes patients aren't there ?
Subject is : is covid different from other viruses, nastier in its after infection effects.Oh touche, maybe not herpes
But cancer or heart failure caused by virus many more than covid.
And with less chance of survival
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?