over9k
So I didn't tell my wife, but I...
- Joined
- 12 June 2020
- Posts
- 5,225
- Reactions
- 7,315
Corruption? What are you talking about? Xi Jinping won 104% of the vote fair & square.
Today’s militarists understand that the anti-war campaigns of the past relied on the organisational muscle of the trade unions – and that unions are at their weakest state in 150 years. They also know that the social movements arising from the new left of the 60s have more of a presence in universities and NGOs than they do on the streets.
So who will stop the march to conflict?
I have yet to see anyone put a case for China having any interest in war.This fellow Jeff Sparrow, who is a Guardian columnist certainly puts the case that any opposition to war with China is not available from the latté left in Australia and the West. I seldom agree with him, but he makes sense in this case.
The rush to warlike rhetoric comes from well padded politicians and fails to be rebuffed by the ALP or the broader left in any significant way. This is because the latter have gone soft and exclusive, hidden in universities arguing against average working people on fatuous issues.
In China on the other hand, opposition arises from time to time, and in the case of Hong Kong is crushed. It is a given that The Leadership rules.
I wonder if an anti-war movement in Australia would be swatted like a nuisance fly by spin, media, apathy and a lack of cojones by the left.
https://www.theguardian.com/comment...d-who-will-stop-the-march-to-the-drums-of-war
gg
From who? As you say it is a super power, with a huge navy and impressive armed forces, who is going to steal ships from them?I have yet to see anyone put a case for China having any interest in war.
China is only interested in ensuring its principal sea routes for trade can be protected.
I have yet to see anyone put a case for China having any interest in war.
China is only interested in ensuring its principal sea routes for trade can be protected.
The baseless claims that are bandied about seem to be accepted here. Worse, they are largely internal Chinese affairs that nations stay out of as a rule.
As I said before, this reminds of Trump's claim that he won the election. Look at the evidence and discuss that rather than the rhetoric.
America has exercised the war option many times since WWII.I personally don't see war as an option. China may not have any interest in war however I see the discussion as "...what if?"
Notwithstanding the so called war on terror, I seriously doubt any of the "super powers" have an appetite to commit to armed conflict. Gaslighting (e.g. Photo-shopped images), diplomatic shenanigans and cyber bullying are far more effective in today's world.
I'm no strategist but all out war, wow, how would that play out?
China, Russia, Nth Korea and their allies against the rest isn't going to end well for either side although, it could be the required reset for the global economy. Now that is one scary thought.
Can't disagree with that, what was the old saying the Arabs unfortunately are sitting on the U.S oil reserves. ?America has exercised the war option many times since WWII.
America has an excellent track record of overthrowing/attempted to overthrow popular/democratically elected governments and replacing them with tyrants/dictators. So don't worry about there being a "strategy" involved when it comes to America.
America has exercised the war option many times since WWII.
America has an excellent track record of overthrowing/attempted to overthrow popular/democratically elected governments and replacing them with tyrants/dictators. So don't worry about there being a "strategy" involved when it comes to America.
I hope you are not serious!All in the cause of defending democracy rob.
Now there ya go you see rederob!America has exercised the war option many times since WWII.
America has an excellent track record of overthrowing/attempted to overthrow popular/democratically elected governments and replacing them with tyrants/dictators. So don't worry about there being a "strategy" involved when it comes to America.
Instigating revolution and providing troops who are involved in conflict in distant nations are acts of war.Now there ya go you see rederob!
It's statements like the one in bold that don't sit well with me. It comes across as if to say the USA have done so wholly and solely on their lonesome which is not entirely correct is it?
On the other side of the see-saw, the Chinese "Art of War" list from the same reference.
USA as enforcing what?I do wonder what would happen if:
1. Australia
2. the rest of the West
dumped the US of A as the defacto "enforcer" and sided with China?
USA as enforcing what?
Just curious.
- Regime change
- Renditions/torture
- Drone killings
- Extrajudicial executions
- Offshore cyber spying
- Bullying
- Sanctions/embargos
- Trade violations
- Non-compliance with UN Resolutions
- Voter suppression
- America First
Not a good rebuttal @SirRumpole as many of your points are not relevant, not supported by evidence, or very weak.
- Regime change --
international spyingno evidence- Renditions/torture --
concentration camps for Uighurs and dissidentsno evidence- Drone killings
- Extrajudicial executions -- judicial executions
for dissentbased on laws, like in USA- Offshore cyber spying -- cyber attacks on institutions/
infrastructurelike carried out by USA- Bullying --
what , really ? Monitoring of and interference with Chinese diaspora in other nationsno case- Sanctions/embargos --
China attacks on Australian exportsno evidence- Trade violations -- SEE ABOVE
- Non-compliance with UN Resolutions --
taking over disputed islands in the South China sea. no evidence that any islands were "taken over" unless you are referring to islands claimed by Taiwan- Voter suppression --
in a one party country that's a jokethere are quite a few parties and everyone votes - you seem to repeat things you do not know about- America First --
China firstno evidence
Not a good rebuttal @SirRumpole as many of your points are not relevant, not supported by evidence, or very weak.
While islands in the Spratley's archipelago remain contested by 5 nations to this day, the same cannot be said about the America/UK claims over Diego Garcia.
Just offer actual evidence, and stop thinking like Trump that because you said it, it's true.Well , what can I say ?
No use replying to someone who doesn't read the news or ignores any evidence that doesn't suit his views.
Typical propagandist.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.