Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

Australian Politics General...

Ref the Higgins debacle

Steven Whybrow SC is probably the most reliable sounding witness to date.

The counsel assisting, Erin Longbottom KC doing a good job.

I’m not sure why Steven has a brow, or why Erin has a long bottom.

Erin in particular must have got lots of questions as a kid.

This is highly entertaining stuff.

What’s it about?
 
the so called Tax scandal involving leaked taxation policy documents by senior members of PWC has caused a few heads to roll
From ABC News
1684197654592.png

1684197766516.png

The scandal may expalin why why Scottie from merketing did not get a gig with the company.
The According to Evil Murdoch press
Margin Call has learned the former PM has been busy considering exit strategies post-politics and was rather strongly put forward to PricewaterhouseCoopers for an advisory role.
PwC didn’t take long to weigh the matter and reject this approach, according to three sources who spoke to this column. One reckoned that, in considering the matter, it was felt that hiring Morrison would have brought an unacceptable level of reputational risk to the firm.

Read that last clause again, and then consider the cyclonic levels of brand erosion that PwC continues to withstand over its tax leaks scandal. The fallout has already led to the resignation of PwC CEO Tom Seymour, who on Monday resigned as a partner and is now scheduled to be out the door by September. Morrison, of course, gave a full-throated denial of his alleged approach, telling Margin Call on Monday: “I have not approached PwC nor have I been offered any role by PwC.” The second half of that statement is not in dispute.
Geez, if ya can't get a job with crooks like PWC, what hope has the bloke got of supplementing his meagre parliamentary pension with some lucrative private consulting work.
Mick
 
the so called Tax scandal involving leaked taxation policy documents by senior members of PWC has caused a few heads to roll
From ABC News
View attachment 156976
View attachment 156978
The scandal may expalin why why Scottie from merketing did not get a gig with the company.
The According to Evil Murdoch press

Geez, if ya can't get a job with crooks like PWC, what hope has the bloke got of supplementing his meagre parliamentary pension with some lucrative private consulting work.
Mick

Good to see that the consulting rorts are finally being exposed.

They are like a cancer eating through the Public Service.
 
the so called Tax scandal involving leaked taxation policy documents by senior members of PWC has caused a few heads to roll
From ABC News

The scandal may expalin why why Scottie from merketing did not get a gig with the company.
The According to Evil Murdoch press

Geez, if ya can't get a job with crooks like PWC, what hope has the bloke got of supplementing his meagre parliamentary pension with some lucrative private consulting work.
Mick

Some big wigs need jail time.

 
The Higgins saga just keeps on giving.
This is dynamite IMO, it certainly proves the "narrative" concept. One just has to hope you aren't caught up in a narrative incident, or you are toast. :xyxthumbs
Lehrmann's lawyers are going to have a field day IMO. o_O.


One of the most senior police investigating Brittany Higgins’ rape allegation has told an inquiry that when he pleaded with her to stop doing media that could prejudice a trial, Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates told him: “She can’t, Scott – she is the face of the movement now.”

In a leaked copy of Detective Superintendent Scott Moller’s statement to the Sofronoff inquiry that was provided to The Australian newspaper, he claims Ms Yates was “more interested in Ms Higgins pushing the ‘#metoo’ movement than being committed to the upcoming trial”.

“This upset me and I remember being mad that the Victims of Crime Commissioner was using the investigation as a voice for reform before the trial had even been conducted,” he said.

In the submission, Detective Superintendent Moller also raises concerns about being pressured “to ensure victims survivors know that when they disclose sexual violence they will be believed” and disputes this is the function of police.

“This is fundamentally at odds with the investigative function of police and the purpose of the criminal justice system (judiciary and juries),” Superintendent Moller says in his submission.

“We as police are the first ‘filter’ to ensuring the integrity of the criminal justice system. The judiciary and the community require and expect police to critically assess all available information and evidence in determining if the threshold to charge has been met.”

The Sofronoff inquiry is examining the conduct of police, the Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold and Ms Yates during the prosecution of Bruce Lehrmann.

Detective Scott Moller’s statement will be published by the Sofronoff inquiry after it was provided to The Australian newspaper.

Mr Drumgold remains on leave from his job at his own request after a week of bombshell evidence during which he was accused of misleading the ACT Supreme Court that a note of his dealing with Lisa Wilkinson was contemporaneous when it was not and withholding a document written by Detective Scott Moller that has become known as the Moller report.
 
Looks like a few careers ending here -

KPMG has sent an urgent email to all staff in the light of the tax leak scandal engulfing rival big four firm PricewaterhouseCoopers describing how serious the matter is that could see PwC lose millions in government fees and face criminal investigations.
On Wednesday, Treasury confirmed it had referred the incident, in which PwC used information garnered from the government to advise it on developing international tax avoidance laws; and then use that very same confidential information to help global clients avoid tax.

“There has been significant exposure on this across the past few weeks,” wrote chief executive Andrew Yates and Alison Kitchen, Australian chairman, in their letter to staff.

“This latest news is an important development: we can no longer sit by and watch our profession be tarnished by the unethical actions of a few. The decision by Treasury underlines the gravity of the matter.”

Treasury referred the leaking of confidential tax briefings by PwC and its former head of international tax Peter Collins to the Australian Federal Police on Wednesday, as public scrutiny of the leaks in parliament heated up.

In a statement, Treasury secretary Steven Kennedy said Mr Collins “improperly used confidential Commonwealth information”, with emails tabled in parliament by the Tax Practitioners Board showing how far the firm spread the information.

Dr Kennedy said the emails “highlighted the significant extent of the unauthorised disclosure of confidential Commonwealth information and the wide range of individuals within PwC who were directly and indirectly privy to the confidential information”.

“In light of these recent revelations and the seriousness of this misconduct, the Treasury has referred the matter to the Australian Federal Police to consider commencement of a criminal investigation,” he said.

Speaking in parliament this morning, AFP national security deputy commissioner Ian McCartney revealed the investigation was currently into “an individual in relation to their activities” but warned if police “identify any further people we believe may have committed an offence” they may find themselves under investigation.

Mr McCartney said the investigation was being run through the sensitive investigations team, but was a priority for the AFP.

Parliament has heard 53 current and former PwC partners and staff received emails revealing confidential tax information.

6f6e2d0876cd684865a9acaac3a0adf2.jpg
Peter Collins, former international tax leader for PwC Australia.
Former PwC chief executive Tom Seymour has admitted he received the leaked tax briefings and has resigned from the job.

However, Mr Seymour will stay on at PwC until September to assist in the leadership transition.

Kristen Stubbins has been appointed PwC’s interim CEO, pending an election by partners.

PwC said “we note the statement from the Treasury Secretary and will continue to co-operate fully with any investigations into this matter.”

At risk are PwC’s contracts with the government worth more than $500m.

Speaking on Thursday, Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil said PwC’s actions were a “grotesque betrayal of trust”, noting while Treasury was currently reviewing the breach there were limits to the response the government could take.

“We can’t break the law just because we’re the government,” she said.

“But we are doing everything we can to make sure there is accountability here.

PwC is facing growing accusations that it is not facing up to the level of mistakes it has made – including its refusal to reveal the names of the 53 partners and staff apart from Mr Collins that were involved in the tax fraud.

Likely sensing that this may be a misstep on behalf of its rival, KPMG made it clear to its staff in its own letter that it too had previously made mistakes and had taken steps to rectify them.

Under the blunt headline “doing the right thing” KPMG issued a mea culpa for past wrongs such as the integrity of the work it did in 2020 by two separate teams for NSW Treasury and Transport for NSW on different aspects of the controversial Transport Asset Holding Entity.

“As a firm we have not got everything right. And with 10,000 people working on complex and high-profile projects, there may be cases where we fall short of what is expected.”

In a clear mea culpa for past wrongs, KPMG said that in the past it had definitely not always gotten things right and had taken steps to fix these matters.

“Two such matters in particular have gained significant public attention – the TAHE matter and internal testing-related misconduct matter. These issues have challenged our internal and public stance of always acting ethically …” the CEO and chairman wrote. “In these cases, we got it wrong. But when we do get it wrong, we work to put it right.”

KMPG’s stance on the matter appears at loggerheads with PwC, which has battened down the hatches and not revealed a number of important facts, including the names of the 53 partners and staff that were involved in the tax fraud, which have all, bar Peter Collins, been redacted.

In its letter to staff, KPMG reiterated that it supported findings of the independent review into the effectiveness of the Tax Practitioners Board and the Tax Agent Services Act 2009, which found the board’s sanctions powers need to be increased.

“KPMG supports the recommendations … that relate to strengthening sanctions, improving individual accountability of partnerships and increasing TPB independence. Our firm looks forward to further public consultation on these reforms in the coming months,” the company said in its letter to staff.

Specifically, KPMG is calling for increasing individual accountability for the delivery of tax agent services within a company or partnership;

Increasing the TPB’s sanction powers, including introducing a number of new sanctions; and

Introducing greater flexibility for the TPB when undertaking investigations, including when disclosing reasons behind sanctions.

 
Looks like a few careers ending here -

Some might be starting new ones... as jailbirds.

It may even help PWC future credibility if this ends in criminal charges and jail time for the principals if convicted. From a Government and company POV I think such an outcome would focus everyone's eyes very carefully on being scrupulous in dealings with Government contracts.
 
Some might be starting new ones... as jailbirds.

It may even help PWC future credibility if this ends in criminal charges and jail time for the principals if convicted. From a Government and company POV I think such an outcome would focus everyone's eyes very carefully on being scrupulous in dealings with Government contracts.
Nah, no chance. They will just concentrate on not getting caught.
mick
 
Some might be starting new ones... as jailbirds.

It may even help PWC future credibility if this ends in criminal charges and jail time for the principals if convicted. From a Government and company POV I think such an outcome would focus everyone's eyes very carefully on being scrupulous in dealings with Government contracts.

Looks like PwC are screwed, and deservedly so.

IMG_0126.jpeg
 
Annabel Crabb does her cheerful, insightful reporting ( bollocking !) of the duplicity of PwC across not just the current scandal but many earlier travesties.

Parliament House takes on a 'fist fight at the chess club' energy, as PwC tax scandal and Voice debate heat up

By Annabel Crabb
Posted 1h ago1 hours ago
13&cropW=5000&xPos=0&yPos=260&width=862&height=485.jpg

Outrage over the PwC tax scandal has been slow burn but the story is nothing short of breathtaking.(Reuters: Wolfgang Rattay)
Help keep family & friends informed by sharing this article

Link copied
Senate Estimates are for nerds. Accountancy is for nerds. So, when Senate Estimates this week turned its basilisk stare upon the trembling, corpulent, loose-sphinctered form of PwC Australia, there was a definite "fist fight in the chess club" energy.

Full props to Labor Senator Deb O'Neill, who has been pursuing for some time the extremely good question of how this giant firm managed simultaneously to advise the federal government on the design of new multinational anti-tax avoidance laws, while actually selling the detail to the intended targets.

Outrage has been slow-burn on this one, but the essential framework here is nothing short of breathtaking. Company collects sweet public coin to advise the government, while in the process collecting confidential detail to on-sell to corporate giants for some more delicious money, the net result of which is less tax revenue for the Commonwealth.

It reminds me of one Labor staffer's description of the 2004 election campaign, as a "three-way clusterf***. With Alsatians."

 
The Higgins saga just keeps on giving.
And today, we have some real meat on it.
John Korn. Lehrmans orignal barrister, has directly contradicted the evidence Drumgold gave to the enquiry.
One of these legal eagles is lying.
The Sofronoff inquiry heard that barrister John Korn, who did not act for Mr Lehrmann during the trial, received a cellebrite report as part of a brief of evidence.

Counsel assisting Joshua Jones said Mr Drumgold said Mr Korn called him after receiving the brief and said Superintendent Scott Moller, a lead investigator, told him there were important text messages in the brief.

Mr Korn said on Thursday he “had no such conversation with Mr Drumgold”.

“I absolutely would not have had that conversation with an opponent, a DPP prosecutor,” he said. “I absolutely would not have had that conversation.”

Can't be any more forthright than that.
So will Drumgold be recalled to "clarify"?
Mick
 
1685678816069.png

Kristina Keneally has warned that there has been an increase in the level of conflict and personal attacks on politicians has increased.
The best bit is that she said she will never seek public office again.
We will all be thankful for that.
Mick
 
View attachment 157650
Kristina Keneally has warned that there has been an increase in the level of conflict and personal attacks on politicians has increased.
This seems to have coincided with both federal and state governments becoming more divisive, authoritarian, illiberal and economically fascist.

IMO this could be easily solved by taking a few steps back from that.... like, many many steps back.
The best bit is that she said she will never seek public office again.
We will all be thankful for that.
Mick
At least there is still some good news :)
 
Last edited:
This seems to have coincided with both federal and state governments becoming more divisive, authoritarian, illiberal and economically fascist.

IMO this could be easily solved by taking a few steps back from that.... like, many many steps back.

At least there is still some good news :)
Again IMO it all boils back to only one side of the political and social spectrum, being allowed to be heard and the other side becoming more and more frustrated, the model works on the premise one side has all the answers and that is never the case IMO.

I think eventually it will end up with a re empowering of the media censorship boards and self regulation being abandoned, but it will take a long time to happen and a lot of social unrest will have to precede it.

A bit like the States are considering re establishing the electricity supply authorities, as the privatisation model begins to fail, eventually it falls into chaos. :2twocents
 
Last edited:
And today, we have some real meat on it.
John Korn. Lehrmans orignal barrister, has directly contradicted the evidence Drumgold gave to the enquiry.
One of these legal eagles is lying.


Can't be any more forthright than that.
So will Drumgold be recalled to "clarify"?
Mick
Mick have a look at this article, some very interesting questions will be asked IMO.
 
Mick have a look at this article, some very interesting questions will be asked IMO.
I have my popcorm, an ample supply of reds, this could be very entertaining now that the legal side of things is done.
Plibersek, like a true Politician, can evade questions till the cows come home, but i think Gallagher is the one in most trouble.
Loved the comments about Albo, MorrisonCash and Reynolds.
It would seem that Tv celebrities have as much respect for politicians as politicians have for media celebs.
Mick
 
I have my popcorm, an ample supply of reds, this could be very entertaining now that the legal side of things is done.
Plibersek, like a true Politician, can evade questions till the cows come home, but i think Gallagher is the one in most trouble.
Loved the comments about Albo, MorrisonCash and Reynolds.
It would seem that Tv celebrities have as much respect for politicians as politicians have for media celebs.
Mick
It's just getting better and better, this is turning out to be the best mini series ever IMO. ?
 
Top