Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

Australian Politics General...

What's going on in NSW @SirRumpole , I thought Labor was anti privatisation? It sounds like they are using the "it isn't our fault, the last Govt did it excuse", it never stopped Dan Andrews ripping up past agreements.
Hopefully they don't go down the privatisation track, I'm yet to see it work.


The former head of the state’s bus network will lead a high-powered taskforce to examine the privatisation of the city’s bus services amid chronic delays and driver shortages.
Former chief executive of State Transit John Lee, who has also headed up private bus companies, has been appointed to lead the taskforce which was a key public transport election commitment.

Plans for a major shake-up of bus services across Sydney have been cast into doubt after it emerged that the former Coalition government signed several deals with private bus companies worth $4.8 billion just before the NSW election, locking the state into long-term contracts.

The taskforce will look at the equity of bus operations across the community and review routes region by region, as well as service delivery, including transparency and accountability of contracts.

It will also investigate infrastructure and technology to support the effective delivery of bus services, including the transition to clean energy, and any necessary legislative changes.
The establishment of the taskforce follows a parliamentary committee recommending late last year that the government consider putting privately operated bus networks back into public hands.
However, the new long-term contracts will make any substantive change difficult because the government will likely be exposed to break fees if deals are altered.
Minister for Transport Jo Haylen said Labor promised voters that it would deal with the consequences of the “former Liberal government’s failed bus privatisation agenda”.

“Passengers have had enough of service cancellations and routes being cut. They expect better bus services, and we need to do better,” Haylen said.
That's the problem with privatisation, it's pretty hard to reverse it because of the booby traps inserted like breach of contract etc.

If an Opposition clearly states that it will break contracts if elected, the risk should be with the private companies to be aware that the contracts might be rescinded, not with the taxpayers.
 
That's the problem with privatisation, it's pretty hard to reverse it because of the booby traps inserted like breach of contract etc.

If an Opposition clearly states that it will break contracts if elected, the risk should be with the private companies to be aware that the contracts might be rescinded, not with the taxpayers.
All that seems to happen with privatisation is, the workers wages and conditions go down, the cost for the service goes up and the politician in charge says "nothing to do with me, see the contractor". Lol
When a politicians area of responsibility gets privatised, the politicians wages should fall IMO.
 
Interesting news:

Associates of Scott Morrison have been sounded out by a major UK company in the defence sector about a senior role for the former prime minister, who could quit federal politics as soon as July.

Morrison’s exit from politics has been widely expected, with six colleagues telling this masthead last month he was expected to quit at some point between the May 9 budget and the end of 2023.
 
Interesting news:

Associates of Scott Morrison have been sounded out by a major UK company in the defence sector about a senior role for the former prime minister, who could quit federal politics as soon as July.

Morrison’s exit from politics has been widely expected, with six colleagues telling this masthead last month he was expected to quit at some point between the May 9 budget and the end of 2023.
I wonder if the French have made him an offer.
 
Well as we said a while back, we will have to do something about the size of the military, looks like the Govt is getting onto it.

ADF promised $400m for retention bonuses​

Australian Defence Force personnel could be up for a $50,000 cash bonus under a federal government push to expand the size of the nation’s military.
The Albanese government will announce it has set aside $400 million for retention bonuses to help reduce the thousands of personnel leaving the armed forces.
Permanent ADF members will be eligible to receive a $50,000 bonus payment near the end of their initial mandatory period of service, if they commit to the military for another three years.
Under the scheme, 3400 personnel will be able to benefit within the first three years.

The government has identified recruitment and retention of personnel as an immediate priority in response to the defence strategic review.
“Defence is facing significant workforce challenges ... this is an acute issue for Defence and is reflective of broader national challenges,” the review reads.
A $2 million review of defence housing will also take place to help improve homeownership rates among serving personnel.
Defence Minister Richard Marles said the department was facing greater challenges to recruit and retain its workforce than it has for decades.
AAP
 
The political pressures at work with the Brittany Higgins allegations.

‘Right to be scared’: Brittany Higgins and the harsh realities about justice and power​

Former Liberal staffer’s experience after alleging she was raped is an insight into how powerful institutions react when confronted with such allegations
Well the plot thickens and the narrative is starting to look very shaky.

DPP accused of withholding key Higgins files​

Bruce Lehrmann’s lawyer says the withheld police documents exposed discrepancies in Brittany Higgins’s rape claims.
 
Well the plot thickens and the narrative is starting to look very shaky.

DPP accused of withholding key Higgins files​

Bruce Lehrmann’s lawyer says the withheld police documents exposed discrepancies in Brittany Higgins’s rape claims.
A bit more detail:


The top prosecutor who ran the rape trial of former Coalition staffer Bruce Lehrmann told an inquiry into the abandoned case that he may have broken the law when he looked at confidential counselling notes about Brittany Higgins.

Walter Sofronoff, the former Queensland Supreme Court judge helming the ACT government investigation into the handling of the high-profile case, accused the territory’s Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold of holding a “double standard” after the latter ensured the sensitive documents were not disclosed to the defence team.
 
A bit more detail:


The top prosecutor who ran the rape trial of former Coalition staffer Bruce Lehrmann told an inquiry into the abandoned case that he may have broken the law when he looked at confidential counselling notes about Brittany Higgins.

Walter Sofronoff, the former Queensland Supreme Court judge helming the ACT government investigation into the handling of the high-profile case, accused the territory’s Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold of holding a “double standard” after the latter ensured the sensitive documents were not disclosed to the defence team.

This enquiry is eye opening. Watching KCs and SCs **** up live on TV is fun to watch. The counsel's for both the AFP and Drumgold are a joke. Maybe this is just how things roll during live enquiries. The AFP counsel in particular doesn't seem to know what she's doing. Drumgold is toast after this. Wearing Aboriginal art motif ties as a SC is not a good indicator.
 
Sounds like the DPP guy is going under the bus.
Also sounds as though his recollection is failing him, jeez no wonder Brittany was having mental health issues IMO.
IMO just shows how your life can change in an instant, if someone wants to get after you, be it Bruce before and now Shane. :rolleyes:
I personally doubt it will have any bearing on the defamation case, that Lisa wasn't told, but time will tell. :xyxthumbs

Wilkinson refutes DPP claims over Logies speech​

Shane Drumgold has defended his decision not to employ an expert witness to analyse CCTV footage of Brittany Higgins to determine her sobriety.


 
Sounds like the DPP guy is going under the bus.
Also sounds as though his recollection is failing him, jeez no wonder Brittany was having mental health issues IMO.
IMO just shows how your life can change in an instant, if someone wants to get after you, be it Bruce before and now Shane. :rolleyes:
I personally doubt it will have any bearing on the defamation case, that Lisa wasn't told, but time will tell. :xyxthumbs

Wilkinson refutes DPP claims over Logies speech​

Shane Drumgold has defended his decision not to employ an expert witness to analyse CCTV footage of Brittany Higgins to determine her sobriety.


From a purely Political perspective, it will be interesting to see what happens when the police get on the stand.
There will be questions about why the police gave the claimants notes to the defence, even if it was inadvertent, the perception by some that the police were too eager to discontinue the case, plus a few questions about what was inadmissable evidence and what was not.
In the same way that Drumsgold was grilled over his perception that there was political interference from Reynolds and Cash, police haad made statements about someone putting political pressure on Police to go ahead with the prosecutuon.
Katy Gallagher might be sweating over the next few weeks it is rumoured.
Mick
 
From a purely Political perspective, it will be interesting to see what happens when the police get on the stand.
There will be questions about why the police gave the claimants notes to the defence, even if it was inadvertent, the perception by some that the police were too eager to discontinue the case, plus a few questions about what was inadmissable evidence and what was not.
In the same way that Drumsgold was grilled over his perception that there was political interference from Reynolds and Cash, police haad made statements about someone putting political pressure on Police to go ahead with the prosecutuon.
Katy Gallagher might be sweating over the next few weeks it is rumoured.
Mick
Who said the police were eager to discontinhe the case?
I thought Drumgold had reversed his claim of political interferance.
What it all seems to indicate to me is, way too many people are taking it upon themselves, to decide who is guilty.
This is the problem with the media having way too much influence on a very gullible audience IMO.
It is highlighted by people taking a moral stance, based completely on which media they believe, when all the media are doing is pushing their personal bias.
Obviously big brother will have no trouble taking over, the gormless masses are giving up free thought. Lol
 
Who said the police were eager to discontinhe the case?
I thought Drumgold had reversed his claim of political interferance.
What it all seems to indicate to me is, way too many people are taking it upon themselves, to decide who is guilty.
This is the problem with the media having way too much influence on a very gullible audience IMO.
It is highlighted by people taking a moral stance, based completely on which media they believe, when all the media are doing is pushing their personal bias.
Obviously big brother will have no trouble taking over, the gormless masses are giving up free thought. Lol
Drumgold in his evdence said that the police had said that there was politcal interference into their side of the case- the notes said that they would not have prosecuted except for the politcal interference.
It remains to be seen where that political interference is supposed to have come from, or is, like Drumgolds perception, nothing but a perception without any facts.
Mick
 
Drumgold in his evdence said that the police had said that there was politcal interference into their side of the case- the notes said that they would not have prosecuted except for the politcal interference.
It remains to be seen where that political interference is supposed to have come from, or is, like Drumgolds perception, nothing but a perception without any facts.
Mick
It certainly sounds like too many people were making their own assumptions, while peoples lives and reputations, took a back seat. IMO
Also it would be difficult to understand why the coalition would have wanted the prosecution to proceed, considering the amount of angst it has caused.
The plot thickens, I think he knows he is going under the bus. ?
I wonder if he will be another payout, in this conga line, of payments?
 
Last edited:
Drumgold in his evdence said that the police had said that there was politcal interference into their side of the case- the notes said that they would not have prosecuted except for the politcal interference.
It remains to be seen where that political interference is supposed to have come from, or is, like Drumgolds perception, nothing but a perception without any facts.
Mick
Don't you think this was presumptuous by Drumgold? unless he had direct contact and discussions with the jury, which I would have thought wasn't allowed.
It sounds like a desperate grasp to stem the avalanche to me, but hey maybe the jury do give thumbs up and thumbs down, I've never done jury duty and never want to.
It will be interesting to see how many are on the DPP bus, at the end of the trip.


The prosecutor in Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial has told an inquiry he believed the juror whose misconduct caused the high-profile case to be aborted was the only one holding out against him securing a conviction.
The revelation was made by the ACT Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold on a day in which he also recanted his earlier allegation that he believed there was a political conspiracy to derail the rape trial of Lehrmann, a former Coalition staffer.
 
Last edited:
Don't you think this was presumptuous by Drumgold? unless he had direct contact and discussions with the jury, which I would have thought wasn't allowed.
It sounds like a desperate grasp to stem the avalanche to me, but hey maybe the jury do give thumbs up and thumbs down, I've never done jury duty and never want to.


The prosecutor in Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial has told an inquiry he believed the juror whose misconduct caused the high-profile case to be aborted was the only one holding out against him securing a conviction.
The revelation was made by the ACT Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold on a day in which he also recanted his earlier allegation that he believed there was a political conspiracy to derail the rape trial of Lehrmann, a former Coalition staffer.
Drumgold has shown so far in this enquiry that he has made a lot of presumptions without any proof.
So far he has had to backtrack on a few of those.
Will this be another one?
Mick
 
Drumgold has shown so far in this enquiry that he has made a lot of presumptions without any proof.
So far he has had to backtrack on a few of those.
Will this be another one?
Mick
Well it certainly appears, that some are trying to put a bit of space between themselves and him. :whistling:

Starting to look like a huge train wreck IMO, if I was him I would be claiming mental health issues, but I'm no expert.

I wonder if sportsbet has a book running on this?

It must be a very nervous time for those facing a Lehrmann defamation claim IMO.

I think this will definitely be made into a mini series at a later date.

The claimant walks away with a payout, the accused fights on to prove innocence and claim compensation, the wreckage tries to mitigate the damage.
What a classic. ?
 
Last edited:
I think this will definitely be made into a mini series at a later date.
From a previous post #1901
Plus I can see a mini series with Tim Winton playing Bruce Lehrman, Nicole Kidman as Ms Higgins, Cate Blanchett playing Cash, Magda Szubanski playing Reynolds, Geoffrey Rush as Albanese, and Eric Bana playing Morrison. Should be a winner.
Mick
To that I would add Kate Blanchette playing the ole of Katy Gallagher, Russel Crowe as Drumgold, Tiriel Moro (aka Dennis denuto from The castle) as Lehrmans bumbling lawyer, Hugh Jackman as Sofranoff , and Margot Robbie the lovely but deadly cross examining lawyer for the AFPLucy Macallum .
Should be a few bit parts for the Helmsworth boys and the recently decamped actors from home and away.
mick
 
? ? ? ? ? ?

Jeez, if you're not watching this 'enquiry', you're really missing out.

Wilkinson's lawyer now smashing Dumbgold from all angles with all sorts of devices. She's one angry ant. Maybe the Tassie Devils could have her face on their footy jumper.

Can't wait for Lisa and the Pirate to be put on the stand, as they should be.
 
Top