- Joined
- 21 April 2014
- Posts
- 7,956
- Reactions
- 1,072
On matters children in detention, Adam Bandt had a question to the PM in QT yesterday,
http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo...dr/1d38c79d-f3f8-401a-81d0-e364715774a5/0000"
Ha! Conscience.
The country is being robbed blind, with politicians being bought and paid for while the masses get to turn up once every few years to tick a box and go home to a house they can barely afford and will take a lifetime to pay off... with utilities being privatised like I-get-you-elected-you-sell-monopolies-to-me, leading to price gouging and profiteering like the good old days of the industrial revolution... and we're here bashing Muslims for wanting to build a place of worship, lock the kids up because while no one wants it it is necessary for security.
Priorities man.
There were 2000 kids in detention under Labor....
.
That's a convenient lie and should be beneath you Noco.
The fact is that the numbers peeked at 1992 in July 2013, but the period of detention/processing was much shorter in fact the lowest detention period = ~60 days on average. It was when the LNP came to office that detention period escalated to a point where it is hovering around 450 - 500 days, presumably for the political gain and profit for some.
If the processing had been kept at July 2013 rate by the Abbott Govt and the number of boat arrivals declined as they have; how many kids would be in detention now Noco? What would have been the subsequent cost to taxpayer for not having to build facilities, pay rapist guards, transported raped and brutalised people to Australian hospitals?
Even your mate Blind Freddy would have enough smarts to know you and Turnbull are trying to be clever dicks to annoy your opponents and prepared to use people's suffering (450 days!!!) to win brownie points. Of course there's always that invisible band of friends who live in one's mind who will approve of the artful deceit.
When someone lands by plane into Australia seeking asylum....are they sent to Nauru or PNG?
It's fantasy to think the boats would have stopped if we continued as business as usual from July 2013.If the processing had been kept at July 2013 rate by the Abbott Govt and the number of boat arrivals declined as they have; how many kids would be in detention now Noco? What would have been the subsequent cost to taxpayer for not having to build facilities,.........?
The number of children in detention under Labor peeked at 2000........The current government has that figure down to around 100...not a bad effort in 2 years....but of course your buddies expect more.
1250 men, women and children lost their lives at sea thanks to Rudd and Gillard's open boarder policy......none have been lost at sea since the Liberal Government came to power......
The LUG parties detention rate was low because they ran out of detention center space and processed them willy nilly...There was no thorough checks made to to find out if they were in fact genuine refugees, criminals or Muslim radicals..
What would you sooner observe?....
People arriving in Australia by air craft do have to have a passport and a visa.......Illegal boat people sent a txt message to Gillard to send a water taxi to pick them up and tossing their IDs over board before hand....They did have passports and visas when they landed in Indonesia....So I ask you, why did they not want to identified?.....I know the answer.
Take your blinkers off....most people with any common sense knew exactly what was happening.
Who's the other to whom you refer to as a welded Liberal ?Do you reckon you could hold off on the charged names and made up acronyms for just a few posts so some of us can see the points you are trying to make Noco.
Corrections:
1. Down to 100 in two years is pitiful and spiteful = human cargo used by Abbott to wound his political opponents
2. They are not my buddies; unlike your good self I am not welded to a political agenda, but a free thinker
3. Your defense is always attack of your chosen insoluble hatred of anything non LNP so there is no room for any dialogue to the contrary.
My post was rhetorical, I didn't expect you or the other welded Liberal to counter, much less with any humanitarian bent. It's as if you think the ALP and Greens own the space that deals with empathy and welfare and their contiguous borders, so anyone expressing a degree of disgust at liars, cheats and opportunists with human tragedy are automatically ALP or Green supporters..... can I remind you of you grand master Menzies back in the sixties and how he made various welfare initiatives his own... or was he a LUGite too?
Do you reckon you could hold off on the charged names and made up acronyms for just a few posts so some of us can see the points you are trying to make Noco.
Corrections:
1. Down to 100 in two years is pitiful and spiteful = human cargo used by Abbott to wound his political opponents
2. They are not my buddies; unlike your good self I am not welded to a political agenda, but a free thinker
3. Your defense is always attack of your chosen insoluble hatred of anything non LNP so there is no room for any dialogue to the contrary.
My post was rhetorical, I didn't expect you or the other welded Liberal to counter, much less with any humanitarian bent. It's as if you think the ALP and Greens own the space that deals with empathy and welfare and their contiguous borders, so anyone expressing a degree of disgust at liars, cheats and opportunists with human tragedy are automatically ALP or Green supporters..... can I remind you of you grand master Menzies back in the sixties and how he made various welfare initiatives his own... or was he a LUGite too?
Wow, with all that rhetoric I have obviously hit a nerve which is still tingling in your body.
The answer I was seeking from you to my question was, why did the illegal boat people throw away their IDs?
You appear to have conveniently wriggled out of that one.
Who's the mystery welded Lib and what did they say to reduce you to name calling ?Well no it hasn't..... I have no idea what asylum seekers do and if they are indeed illegals under the charter we are signatories too. I sure as 54it don't believe anything the lying mouths in Canberra tell the nation.
I'm annoyed that the green shoots Malcolm was showing died a death when he responded to that Greens idiot by attacking, instead of merely stating he was part of the previous policy. I was hoping we now had a leader rather than a twopenny polly.... even I get disappointed at my predictions coming true when it's not in the national interest.
and I still ask you give us all a break from the names and acronyms
There's a lot of comment in the above that's unrelated to the specific topic of this thread but that's perhaps a reflection of what the critics of the current government's border protection policies are reduced to in this thread.Ha! Conscience.
The country is being robbed blind, with politicians being bought and paid for while the masses get to turn up once every few years to tick a box and go home to a house they can barely afford and will take a lifetime to pay off... with utilities being privatised like I-get-you-elected-you-sell-monopolies-to-me, leading to price gouging and profiteering like the good old days of the industrial revolution... and we're here bashing Muslims for wanting to build a place of worship, lock the kids up because while no one wants it it is necessary for security.
Priorities man.
There's a lot of comment in the above that's unrelated to the specific topic of this thread but that's perhaps a reflection of what the critics of the current government's border protection policies are reduced to in this thread.
If we were to scrap the detention network, how do we do that without incentivising illegal people smuggling activities ?
That's the question to which I'm yet to see an answer. What's not an answer is opening our borders as the Greens would like.
Fully agree on where the money is lost and the real economic issues (tax avoidance etc) but:You may think they're unrelated, I obviously think otherwise.
,,,.
We already help more than a few through the humanitarian component of our immigration intake.Bloody hell, you tax Google and Apple and BHP fairly like you'd tax the rest of the small folks, you could fund all university places and a few non-toll bridges and railways, and maybe could help a few refugees too.
I'm wondering if the conditions we detain the boat people in isn't worse than from whence they came?
That's the idea isn't it ?
So they decide to go back.
I would guess so and in the process smear the nation with the odour.
Might be a bit dangerous in the future visiting those origin countries and speaking in an Oz accent.
Fully agree on where the money is lost and the real economic issues (tax avoidance etc) but:
will letting anyone in (as this is what the so called refugee debate is) change any of these economic/tax issues?
no
Will this worsen the situation for the majority of australian ? yes!
I would also strongly contest your statement that refugees contribute economically to society:
we are not talking migrants/italian/greeks coming in 50y ago, we are talking about a new wave of people who still are on welfare 80% of the time after 3/5 years from some souvenirs
Noco i am sure would be able to find figures and source!!!
But these were not LNP distorded figures.
We are probably to blame as we do not give them the opportunities
When there is no job for locals (aka ozzies) you do not bring in more people costs;
All this does not consider the cultural threat, so please luutzu, have a nice trip to Europe and see what migration (the one we are talking about) can do to annihilate both an economy and a culture.
And you should also remember that big business has always been for an open door policy, these big businesses rorting the tax system must have such a conscience, unless migration is a nice way to screw your workforce and increase your profit?
So who do you actually help on this debate?I am so cynical am I
We already help more than a few through the humanitarian component of our immigration intake.
The substance of your argument in your post above seems to be to justify opening the door to people smuggling on the basis that two (or more) wrongs make a right. There's a fundamental admission in that that you recognise what you are advocating is wrong.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?