I thought our constitution permit freedom of religion.
.
Tisme said:and that,
Religious freedom has a value in the Commonwealth constitution
only in so far as the practise of such freedom does not offend
against the accustomed community rights of other Australians.
That this is the exact opposite of what could be expected from a
provision guaranteeing religious freedom against the ‘tyranny of
the majority’ has not concerned the High Court.
The only present day religion, that I know of, that supports human sacrifices to an imaginary god is Islamism...in fact they shout "Abu Akbar" when doing the killing.
I thought our constitution permit freedom of religion.
Only if it's in the majority community good.
Apart from Gary Ablett Snr, are their unimagined Gods?!
Only if it's in the majority community good.
"4.23 In recent years, the High Court has demonstrated a general trend towards
greater awareness of human rights in a number of recent decisions.
Despite this, the wording of s. 116, nonetheless, remains limited in scope.
Alone, it does not amount to a constitutional guarantee of the right to
freedom of religion and belief.
24
Extending the scope of Section 116
4.24 In recent years, there have been suggestions that the negative protections
in the Constitution should be supplemented by legislation to achieve
greater positive protection. The High Court has not proved eager to
extend interpretations of s. 116 in this way. Examining cases in which it
has considered s. 116, Michael Hogan argued that:
25
All the indications are that s. 116 imposes scarcely any restraint on
a determined Commonwealth Government and offers virtually no
guarantee of religious freedom or equality to the churches.
26
and that,
Religious freedom has a value in the Commonwealth constitution
only in so far as the practise of such freedom does not offend
against the accustomed community rights of other Australians.
That this is the exact opposite of what could be expected from a
provision guaranteeing religious freedom against the ‘tyranny of
the majority’ has not concerned the High Court.
27
4.25 Similarly, Stephen McLeish argued that s. 116 needs to be made more
coherent, particularly by developing a reading which pays greater
attention to civil rights rather than legislative power.
28
4.26 Some academics have argued that the most obvious addition would be to
extend the operation of s. 116 to the States. "
http://www.aph.gov.au/parliamentary...es_committees?url=jfadt/religion/relchap4.pdf
Only a brain dead idiot would consider the poisonous dictatorship of Islam to be in the majority community good.
Tisme
Is there any chance that you could write coherently?
If you can't, maybe you should get help from someone who can.
Perhaps it would help if you proof read your posts before sending.
You want me to dumb it down?
You posted about an imaginary God, I was asking about the God that isn't imaginary.....
No thanks - it already looks dumb enough due to your use of the word 'their' when you should have used the word 'there'.
No I did not, but if you think I did then please quote the post number you're referring to.
Fair point, my bad about the OP (actually Calliope). The there/their brain farts you can live with I'm sure
But to think that Islam is tyrannical, harsh and unforgiving while other religion are more enlightened... that's not really thinking at all.
"Take us to Australia please or we will die here.
"Please hear us Mr Peter Dutton. We know you are different, not cruel."
The people who are ‘not really thinking at all’ are the ones who are in denial about the problems that Islam has caused in every single country in which it's gained a foothold.
The world was at peace before Islam, and it is only after Islam that the world had known war and conflicts and all that terrorist stuff. Right?
I mean, the Roman love every barbarians it imposed its will on, love the Gauls so much Caesar sent about 1/3 of them to their maker early.
The Christian kingdoms of Europe... all love and no poverty or any such things before the Muslims arrived.
Must be nice to see things that way. Simple, straight forward, good is what we do evil is what they do.
Just an observation.......
As usual, you distort things by implying that people said or think things that they didn’t actually say or think. You do it all the time on this forum. Nobody on here has suggested there was peace in the world before Islam. Nobody on here has said the Romans were nice people.
We’re not talking about what any other mob did prior to now, we’re talking about what effect the scourge of Islam is having on the world right now.
If you want to deny that Islam is causing serious problems right now in every single country in which it’s established a foothold, and is starting to cause serious problems right here in Australia, then you’re a naive fool who needs to take your head out of the sand and get in touch with reality.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?