It sounds as though the immigration situation is about to also follow the Trump era lead.
I don't follow any of U.S politics, I only had an interest in Trump due to the fact he stopped poncing on like most politicians do and actually tried to do something about the slow slide of the Wests living standards.
Bingo, absolutely!I don't follow any of U.S politics, I only had an interest in Trump due to the fact he stopped poncing on like most politicians do and actually tried to do something about the slow slide of the Wests living standards.
By introducing tariffs on Chinese gear, giving the EU a kick up the butt for having a selfish self centered attitude and demanding refugees use the correct channels to enter the country.
The problem with most of that, it was exactly opposite to what big business wanted, they wanted to manufacture in third world countries to maximise profits, the EU which also is a big business conglomerate were having a beano spending all their money on vehicle production also in third world countries and exporting them to the U.S why would they want to divert money to the U.S for arms, when the U.S can just come and save their ar$e like every other time, then you have the illegals working for nothing for fear of deportation keeping wages down.
Trump had to go. ?
The only problem is, all the issues Trump said would become a problem have come to fruition.
China is much more confident now Trump has gone.
The EU is begging the US to bail them and the Ukraine out, which Trump inferred was the issue with being captive to Russia's gas.
The immigration issue is becoming a massive problem for them.
Add to that North Korea who Trump told Kim to pull his head in, or he would blow it off, Kim hadn't fired ICBM's for several years after the Trump confrontation, he is now throwing them around with gay abandon.
Yep things look a lot more stable post Trump.
I don't follow any of U.S politics, I only had an interest in Trump due to the fact he stopped poncing on like most politicians do and actually tried to do something about the slow slide of the Wests living standards.
By introducing tariffs on Chinese gear, giving the EU a kick up the butt for having a selfish self centered attitude and demanding refugees use the correct channels to enter the country.
The problem with most of that, it was exactly opposite to what big business wanted, they wanted to manufacture in third world countries to maximise profits, the EU which also is a big business conglomerate were having a beano spending all their money on vehicle production and industrial manufacturing also in third world countries and exporting them to the U.S why would they want to divert money to the U.S for arms, when the U.S can just come and save their ar$e like every other time, then you have the illegals working for nothing for fear of deportation keeping wages down.
Trump had to go. ?
The only problem is, all the issues Trump said would become a problem have come to fruition.
China is much more confident now Trump has gone.
The EU is begging the US to bail them and the Ukraine out, which Trump inferred was the issue with being captive to Russia's gas.
The immigration issue is becoming a massive problem for them.
Add to that North Korea who Trump told Kim to pull his head in, or he would blow it off, Kim hadn't fired ICBM's for several years after the Trump confrontation, he is now throwing them around with gay abandon.
Yep things look a lot more stable post Trump.
I'm definitely not saying Trump didn't have self interest, of course he did most politicians do to varying degrees.
But Trump from memory is into the leisure industry, so the more affluent Americans are, the more money they have to spend in his businesses.
So actually returning manufacturing to the U.S would have helped Trump, but it would have been to the detriment of margins for manufacturing businesses, so who pays the media? advertising, who advertises the most?
What he's religious, that's hard to believe, but then again knowing the religious people I've met, maybe not. Lol
So in summary, what evidence in the Supreme Court negated the points I made, as listed:
So in summary, what evidence in the Supreme Court negated the points I made, as listed:
China trade tariffs.
EU underspending as a percentage of GDP on military equipment and technology.
Supressing Kim jong-un, missile testing.
Enforcing tighter border control measures, to name a few.
The other obvious point in your short succinct sentence, that probably requires addressing is the "hate speech" (useful idiot), I thought that was a right wing loony affliction, hated and despised by the left?
Obviously not, if it falls under the umbrella of an acceptable target, that is probably going to be the undoing of all this nonsense IMO.
Interesting times on many fronts, the rich championing the poor has to end badly, the middle class carry all the load and receive the least reward.
Absolutely agree, but from a political and economic perspective, the points you raise are just the result of a very unpleasant personality, which I've never disagreed with. All your examples are personality based, which is what I've been pointing out.
It actually doesn't matter, what he said post losing the election, he is then a disenfranchised megalomaniac. He is no longer the President, there will be those who still follow him, but the next election will show how much traction he has gained.
No he isn't SP. According to him and the 40 million followers who believe everything he says... he should still be President and only lost office because of a corrupt electoral system.
And? It takes all kinds of personalities to be in office to suit the times, as I've said before Winston Churchill was legendary during the war, but apparently a very unattractive pompous person and didn't last in peacefull times.
$.78 billion. Upper end.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.