Not sure but I've run out of popcorn
Me too @HumidNot sure but I've run out of popcorn
Before text messaging?Me too @Humid
Reminds me of a time I was going to end a relationship with a girl and took her to the movies to do so after the final scene. Her granny decided to come along and carked it halfway through and I had to break it to the girl at her gran's funeral and got criticised for it.
Ever since then I don't do any favours in a situation such as a thread like this.
gg
You're hardly one to be calling anyone else bitter!
When you get down to zero the only way to go is up, and that tends to be a pretty invigorating experience if you have a fundamentally positive mindset.
That fiat currencies are "paper."
Thanks @rederobThat fiat currencies are "paper."
Printed "money" is paper, but money can also be "created" on balance sheets, which can be paper or digital nowadays (did you ever see anyone carry their $750k in cash to the bank so they could buy their house?).
That's why @ducati916's use of M1 and M2 are a bit of a red herring.
Iran's printed money - physical paper - just had 2 zeroes removed from it, so within a nation the government can give and take as it pleases.
The bottom line is if you want a store of "value" it cannot be "paper."
Most people recover from the virus, so isn't it obvious that there is an immune response ?
1. Fiat currencies have a net value of zero.
2. Sovereign nations cannot go broke because they can create "money" as they see fit.
3. @ducati should have used money in physical circulation to make his point, rather than M1 and M2 constructs, as they just muddy these waters.
4. MMT only begins to unravel when foreign transactions come into play and the "value" of printed money is brought to account.
5. In between the above, sovereign nations can do what they like and suffer the consequences.
For example, our government has just created, on paper, a massive accounting debt. Nobody lent Australia the "money" that will be paying out on JobKeeper, JobSeeker and a myriad of other programs.
6. Coalition governments like to hang their hat on being good "money managers" but finance experts know this is a spurious claim.
7. I don't always agree with @kahuna1's wording but he's one of the smartest posters at this site.
A discussion of MMT is beyond the scope on this thread.
I addressed this at #4.2. Slightly inaccurate: Sovereign nations that do not incur debts in other than their own currency. That has been the issue where Sovereign nations have borrowed in US dollars or whatever and cannot obtain/earn that foreign currency to pay outstanding debts.
You can repeat your mistake as often as you wish, but here's the truth and it's also line-itemed in the table you posted.3. Incorrect. Read the underlined/highlighted section:
1. I addressed this at #4.
2. Sovereign nations may have an obligation to pay a foreign debt, but they can simply default and carry on as usual, with the debt as an overhang.
3. You can repeat your mistake as often as you wish, but here's the truth and it's also line-itemed in the table you posted.
4. Bottom line is that paper in physical circulation disagrees with M1 by a massive margin. The remaining M1 components are not physical currency but, instead, "accounts."
5. Keeping the modern banking system afloat is a very complex matter. However, it is impossible to avoid the fact that paper money ultimately has no value. I won't argue further with you on this so will instead make a very simple point that most readers will understand. Some years back had you holidayed in the USA your physical Australian dollar could buy you USD$1.10 yet that very same dollar today (ie the unchanged physical component or "money") gets you about USD$0.64 cents. The only thing that changed in the intervening period was a set of complex accounting arrangements within a global financial system that debased the money in your hands. And if that does not convince you that our paper money has no value, see how you go with only Australian physical currency - aka paper money - on your holiday to Uzbekistan.
Russia, Pakistan and Argentina are examples of nations carrying on as normal after defaulting on their debts. Many more have in recent decades.1. In part. Just inaccurately at your original [2]: because an insolvency or default is not really just a carry on as normal.
2. See above.
3. Two points:
(a) Your chart only goes to 2018. It is 2yrs out of date; and
(b) Read the text.
The currency component of M1, sometimes called "money stock currency," is defined as currency in circulation outside the U.S. Treasury and Federal Reserve Banks. Data on total currency in circulation are obtained weekly from balance sheets of the Federal Reserve Banks and from the U.S. Treasury. Weekly currency in circulation data are published each week on the Federal Reserve Board's H.4.1 statistical release "Factors Affecting Reserve Balances of Depository Institutions and Condition Statement of Federal Reserve Banks." Vault cash is reported on the FR 2900 and subtracted from total currency in circulation. For institutions that do not file the FR 2900, vault cash is estimated using data reported on the Call Reports.
(i) The 'currency component' in 'circulation' is cash in your pocket; and
(ii) See FRB H.4.1
View attachment 103315
In 1 week: April 15 to April 22 currency in you pocket increased by $5,971M or essentially $6 Billion dollars.
4. Re. 'accounts'. Accounts are 'money'. Accounts are an expansion of the money supply. Due to the slightly more abstract nature of the original argument, vis-a-vis 'printing', it seemed easier to just provide documentary evidence of 'cash in the pocket'.
5. You are confusing 'no value' with loss of purchasing power over time due to inflation of fiat currencies.
jog on
duc
This might help regarding the "component" nature of M1:Your repeated point about physical money in circulation is patently false. Yes the chart is 2 years old because it's the latest available from the Federal Reserve. Nevertheless, it is crystal clear from the charted information - yours and mine - that M1 is about twice as much as printed paper in circulation. My chart even describes the value of the circulated note, so it is not an "accounting" item, unlike a number of those referenced under M1.
1. Russia, Pakistan and Argentina are examples of nations carrying on as normal after defaulting on their debts. Many more have in recent decades.
Yes, their financial systems are impaired to the extent that there is an overhang, but the average person on the street is generally oblivious
2. Your repeated point about physical money in circulation is patently false. Yes the chart is 2 years old because it's the latest available from the Federal Reserve. Nevertheless, it is crystal clear from the charted information - yours and mine - that M1 is about twice as much as printed paper in circulation. My chart even describes the value of the circulated note, so it is not an "accounting" item, unlike a number of those referenced under M1.
3. Finally, I realise printed money has purchasing power, as that's its whole purpose. That purchasing power has 2 components: internal and external. Externally, it's reliant on a global financial system that can make it worthless overnight. If it had intrinsic value, that would not be possible.
4. In the gold thread I provided some charts that clearly showed several of your points were not soundly based, and time and time again you came back with responses that ignored what was presented. You are doing the same here and it's not a good look.
For most Venezualans there was no real difference before and after. Their national debt crisis was a long time coming.1. At the point leading up to default and a period (immediately) after default, life would have been far from normal.
On the contrary.In any case, you have missed entirely the issue that was being argued:
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.