- Joined
- 29 January 2006
- Posts
- 7,217
- Reactions
- 4,438
Yep, as are the likes of Louis Farrakhan and other anti-white racists.The only black Nascar racer found a noose in his shed yesterday. KKK like the lovely lady above are still around.
This looks like Jussie Smollett v.2The only black Nascar racer found a noose in his shed yesterday. KKK like the lovely lady above are still around.
I don't think the site has enough bandwidthWHERE IS KAhUNA?
Hope he/she is available to comment/post on the thread they created.
I think ropes are racist and should be banned.This looks like Jussie Smollett v.2
where the demand for racism is outstripping supply.
Gotta comment. I don't think tweets cut it, pictures will help the story.
Here is a picture of Bubba Wallaces's garage. The guy is the only black racer in Nascar and if you ever see a picture of him he is probably only 1/4 black. Anyway he said something bad about the conferderate flag which got a few rednecks upset.
It's obviously a misunderstanding. Nooses are in everyone's car sheds in this area and he should be proud that someone has secretly taken the time to put one outside his ready for use. It shows he has been accepted into the fraternity.Become one of the good old boys. Bluddy left wingers. Bubba didn't whinge, he understands perfectly.
Ok, I will gladly admit I was wrong. Give me some proof.You're late to the party and missed the bit about how that rope had been hanging there with the same knot since months before he was using that garage. Others had been using the garage before him and had taken pictures in their which showed it. It wasn't put there because of him, he came after it was there.
But hey, stick to the fictional narrative, it's the thing to do, right?
I think there was one in the Wayne post, and if i was interested by this nth crap raised i would look for it before making an opinionOk, I will gladly admit I was wrong. Give me some proof.
Ok, I will gladly admit I was wrong. Give me some proof.
While political divides exist in most countries, the USA has created a fact divide that coexists within it.
This has been the case with Obama's "birther" claims and climate change:
Now it's also the case with COVID-19:
At time of writing the number of daily infections at 51.200 (John Hopkins as source) was over twice as high as the average daily number for May and June combined. The clear trend shows an alarming rate of rising infection. As a result, deaths in July are projected to increase throughout the month:
Fortunately the President expects this will "soon disappear."
Please provide your evidence.The left controls the majority of the mainstream media, the overwhelming share of entertainment media, social media, the education system, etc.
I presented polling data, and data from US government websites which are regarded as credible.The goal of your article seems to be to further polarise people....
Perhaps you could assimilate the evidence and draw a different conclusion from something you regard as credible.Given that this article is blatantly biased with an agenda of making Republicans look stupid, it's necessary to present this, otherwise it's no more meaningful than wandering around making one of those 'let's make our opposition looks stupid' videos which you can find no shortage of for both sides.
It seeks an opinion. If you saw information that clearly showed a situation that was significantly worse than previously the case, and noted how comparable nations sat by comparison, then reaching an informed opinion on the question is not difficult.The issue of whether or not "the worst is now behind us" for the pandemic is also vague.
It's about determining that despite there being information which is freely available and credible (ie. unambiguously verifiable), a large number people are able to disassociate from facts based on political stance.Basically this dichotomy is between people blindly believing everything they are told and unquestioningly going along with the mainstream herd, and those who see the lies and propaganda, are unable to differentiate between that and the facts, and reject the entire set of what they're being told.
It's about determining that despite there being information which is freely available and credible (ie. unambiguously verifiable), a large number people are able to disassociate from facts based on political stance.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?