Which sectors/areas of the economy are likely to become more important as Australia ages (beyond healthcare)?
But I'm sceptical about domestic services - there's probably not enough incentive for an able-bodied Gen-Y to do a good-enough job that pleases a grumpy old man or woman.
Do you mean for unemployed on work for the dole programs to be deployed to help the elderly in their homes? I can think of many reasons why this is an awful suggestion.Work for the dole? would have to be thought through and I wonder how many would fail a police check?
Do you mean for unemployed on work for the dole programs to be deployed to help the elderly in their homes? I can think of many reasons why this is an awful suggestion.
I do. And I don't think it would work in their homes. Maybe outside the homes - gardens etc - but I expect the cost to supervise etc would be too much. Scrub this idea!!
Do you mean for unemployed on work for the dole programs to be deployed to help the elderly in their homes? I can think of many reasons why this is an awful suggestion.
Definitely over 50's housing in secure communities.
We'd be better off finding the ones who have some get up and go and subsidising them through TAFE. With most of the states increasing the cost of TAFE I really don't know where the next generation of tradies is going to come from.
I know it's orthodox theory these days fro Governments to get out of running business, but the old state and federal run companies like Telecom and the utlities used to churn out the apprentices. They'd hang around in the public sector for a while and then a good proportion of them would head out into the private sector.
These days the private sector moans about the skills shortages in many industries, but they'd all much rather bid up the price of the small talent pool available than actually put the effort into increasing the skilled workforce.
i intend to be a pain in the neck for as longs as possible , just to irritate the Davos and Bilderberg party-goers (and my carbon foot-print is much smaller than theirs )Just while we are on the subject of an ageing population has anyone looked at the best way to live one's life so that one does not end up :
My preference would be to die from a massive unannounced heart attack or stroke, a bullet from an attacker coming from behind or some other painless untoward event.
- Disabled from a stroke in a Nursing Home being called "dear" or it's linguistic equivalent by one's carers.
- End up in a Nursing Home anyways being called ...
- Having to go in to one of those awful retirement villages full of mens shedders and busybodies.
- Developing some other godawful disease that makes one's life a misery before dying in pain or distress.
It appears that the doctors spend much time keeping mens shedders and busybodies alive but don't cater much for such as I who very much enjoy life and care not a cent for when I go, but do about how I go.
The Euthanasia Legislation just caters for those with advanced miserable diseases.
The medical and pharmaceutical industry should take much of the blame for the ageing unhappy population, keeping people alive beyond when they would wish to, and are in many ways to blame for all these retirement complexes, nursing homes and the skewed demographic graphs.
gg
Robotics and AI. There will be a lot of old people and a much smaller working age demographic to look after them. Picture a C3PO type of character who cleans up, serves meals and prepares medications. He works 24/7 without complaint, doesn't abuse the oldies when no one's looking, and all he wants in return is a recharge every so often. He costs a couple of mill, but with all things considered, he's a much better option than a human.Which sectors/areas of the economy are likely to become more important as Australia ages (beyond healthcare)?
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.