- Joined
- 2 October 2006
- Posts
- 3,043
- Reactions
- 2
confirmation of the kennedy being in the eagleford
confirmation the baker 2 well is about to go on production
confirmation that kunde 3 is being fracced at the moment
interesting that they operator TCEI required the jvp to wait for all that time (practically a year), for kunde 3, which is a chalks well to be fracture stimulated, before fracture stimulating the eagleford in kennedy 1h. now to my way of thinking isnt it fair to say the two formations would be fracture stimulated by completely different methods and processes?
so how is this possible???? you cant tell me that TCEi did not know the frac of sugarloaf 1 was in the eagleford ?
adi presentation January 2008
http://www.adelphienergy.com.au/files/asx/ASX Release 21 January 2008 Corporate Presentation.pdf
Sugarloaf
Vertical
• Fracture stimulated and
tested bottom chalk zone
• Flowed max 387mcgfd +
50bbls condensate then
water
• Water is from an
underlying formation
penetrated by the
induced fractures
• No further tests planned
until after Kennedy tested
Kennedy
Horizontal
• Drilled in upper Chalk
interval with liner
cemented in place
• Detailed frac and test
design underway
• Timing of test as soon as
practical subject to
finalisation of frac design
and availability of
equipment
• Valuable information to
be learned from
application of different
frac and completion
techniques in adjacent
wells
eme release last night on kennedy 1h
On 31 August 2008 it was announced that Kennedy 1H was being shut- in while production and tie-in facilities were completed for eventual
connection with the nearby transmission line. Production recommenced on the 2 October 2008 at a rate of 200 thousand cubic feet of gas per
day and 60 barrels condensate per day.
This is the first time production has originated from the "Middle" pay zone, (eagleford) and therefore augurs well for recoverable reserve considerations. A decision whether or not to perforate and fracture stimulate the remaining 3,000ft of horizontal section will be made following the analysis of production performance.
the chairman of eme says this in the release
We are mindful of shareholders needing to rely upon accurate information for their Company and urge shareholders to only rely upon Company endorsed information either via announcements or reliable published research.
ok...
so without apology the operators are now actually declaring the truth on kennedy being in the eagleford, and yet failing to elaborate on sugarloaf 1 which was not testing the austin chalks at all.
when i look at completion reports and it says 12500 feet in kennedy and i am told to believe its in the upper chalks!! do they think i am unable to read a completion report??
the chalks are at 11900 feet in sugarloaf 1 and the kenendy well was never in it..
why they decided to ignore the chalks completely, and change strategies and go for the eagleford without even knowing how to frac that region and without telling any of the shareholders is a question very much unanswered.
as far as i am concerned, if the jvp are going to continue to change operational stategies and not inform the shareholders for 12 months, then its going to be tough to convince prospective investors into the future operations of sugarkane play (all three zones)
i participated in capital raising and put money down for operations that in hingsight had zip to do with the austin chalks. and i kinda feel duped here..
if the focus is the eagleford then make it the focus, but imho so far the only capital actually invested into the austin chalks so far in block b is one well kowalik, and all other operations in sugarloaf 1 and kennedy have been in the eagleford whilst maintaining steadfastly the ops were in the chalks!!
we are so far being told the weston well is to test the upper chalks zone..
this is absolutely confusing, how can i be sure its the case??
confirmation the baker 2 well is about to go on production
confirmation that kunde 3 is being fracced at the moment
interesting that they operator TCEI required the jvp to wait for all that time (practically a year), for kunde 3, which is a chalks well to be fracture stimulated, before fracture stimulating the eagleford in kennedy 1h. now to my way of thinking isnt it fair to say the two formations would be fracture stimulated by completely different methods and processes?
so how is this possible???? you cant tell me that TCEi did not know the frac of sugarloaf 1 was in the eagleford ?
adi presentation January 2008
http://www.adelphienergy.com.au/files/asx/ASX Release 21 January 2008 Corporate Presentation.pdf
Sugarloaf
Vertical
• Fracture stimulated and
tested bottom chalk zone
• Flowed max 387mcgfd +
50bbls condensate then
water
• Water is from an
underlying formation
penetrated by the
induced fractures
• No further tests planned
until after Kennedy tested
Kennedy
Horizontal
• Drilled in upper Chalk
interval with liner
cemented in place
• Detailed frac and test
design underway
• Timing of test as soon as
practical subject to
finalisation of frac design
and availability of
equipment
• Valuable information to
be learned from
application of different
frac and completion
techniques in adjacent
wells
eme release last night on kennedy 1h
On 31 August 2008 it was announced that Kennedy 1H was being shut- in while production and tie-in facilities were completed for eventual
connection with the nearby transmission line. Production recommenced on the 2 October 2008 at a rate of 200 thousand cubic feet of gas per
day and 60 barrels condensate per day.
This is the first time production has originated from the "Middle" pay zone, (eagleford) and therefore augurs well for recoverable reserve considerations. A decision whether or not to perforate and fracture stimulate the remaining 3,000ft of horizontal section will be made following the analysis of production performance.
the chairman of eme says this in the release
We are mindful of shareholders needing to rely upon accurate information for their Company and urge shareholders to only rely upon Company endorsed information either via announcements or reliable published research.
ok...
so without apology the operators are now actually declaring the truth on kennedy being in the eagleford, and yet failing to elaborate on sugarloaf 1 which was not testing the austin chalks at all.
when i look at completion reports and it says 12500 feet in kennedy and i am told to believe its in the upper chalks!! do they think i am unable to read a completion report??
the chalks are at 11900 feet in sugarloaf 1 and the kenendy well was never in it..
why they decided to ignore the chalks completely, and change strategies and go for the eagleford without even knowing how to frac that region and without telling any of the shareholders is a question very much unanswered.
as far as i am concerned, if the jvp are going to continue to change operational stategies and not inform the shareholders for 12 months, then its going to be tough to convince prospective investors into the future operations of sugarkane play (all three zones)
i participated in capital raising and put money down for operations that in hingsight had zip to do with the austin chalks. and i kinda feel duped here..
if the focus is the eagleford then make it the focus, but imho so far the only capital actually invested into the austin chalks so far in block b is one well kowalik, and all other operations in sugarloaf 1 and kennedy have been in the eagleford whilst maintaining steadfastly the ops were in the chalks!!
we are so far being told the weston well is to test the upper chalks zone..
this is absolutely confusing, how can i be sure its the case??