- Joined
- 18 February 2006
- Posts
- 4,200
- Reactions
- 2
What do you think of Gerard Burg's (of NAB melbourne- minerals and energy) Zinc to drop 11% in 2008: Study story quoted here at Buisness standard dot com do any of you think it a major concern in relation to AAR's potential KP project and outlined plans in general?
Scuba, if your talking a down turn in Zinc prices, then yes it will affect AAR's projects, just like it will effect ZFX to OXR to JML to TZN to PDZ to PEM to CBH to KZL,
But the point is Koongie is a multi commodity deposit, containing good levels of Cu and so the company is not as exposed to the Zinc price as say PDZ, BSM or TZN, especially since Mandilla is GOLD
Also I reckon general views on commodities are more suited to the commodity specific threads
Hey Hangseng,
Yeah I know I'm being conservative, but I prefer to be conservative than over optimistic, even then with a "conservative" view I can still easily justify a 17c-18c target for AAR, now that makes you think, if we through caution to the wind what would we get?
I mean valuing Koongie on an Industry Norm of 10% of I.G.V./InSitu = $120m = 24c on its own
Chart wise there is now clear support at 8c-9c but for some strange reason the stock keeps failing to break 12c-13c, eventually though it should and will break this as it has to get re-rated
I mean focusing purely on Koongie, the most comparable deposits are TZN's Angus and PDZ'z Prarie Downs
The main thing to note however is both TZN's and PDZ's deposits lack COPPER and thus imo are inferior as they are more succeptible to Single commodity price swings The thing about AAR's Angas is like JML's Jaguar, its diversified with Copper, Zinc, Lead and Silver, a VMS if you will.
TZN currently carries a Mkt Cap of $400m, however they also have other substantial projects so it would be incorrect to infer that Angas accounts for the bulk of this value, however prior to any of thier other projects gaining recognition (ie Early-Mid 2006) TZN carried a mkt capitalisation of $100m-$150m, which was reflective of the 10% I.G.V of Angas As Angas moved further along the development path a premium to the 10% was given
PDZ's mkt cap is $110m and its main deposit/project is Prarie Downs, now PDZ is also only in a PFS type stage yet their mkt cap is $100m
BSM carries a mkt cap of $40m and they are mining via toll treatment a very small but high grade Zinc/Lead deposit, they do have substantial exploration potential, but then so does AAR at Mandilla and Victoria Downs,
Now why does say PDZ carry a mkt cap double AAR with an inferior deposit and no cash flow operations? Same resoan why BSM carries a mkt cap close to AAR when all it has is a small cash cow project (like AAR's Mandilla) with huge exploration potential (like AAR's Victoria Downs)
The answer is simple, BROKER COVERAGE!
Fat Prophets, Hartleys and Patersons were all over TZN early days hence why people knew and appreciated its true value, likewise Hartleys were the main backers of JML hence why the mkt always knew its true value,
Patersons has backed and provided research reports for PDZ and BSM, again why the mkt can appreciate the potential and the value,
But AAR has no real coverage, FAT Prophets did cover AAR a while back as did Intersuisse, see below for important extracts,
Bottom line is management have now given Koongie a Insitu value = to me it shows their getting more and more serious with, the re-rating is coming, its only amatter of time
Research Reports
http://www.anglo.com.au/_content/documents/538.pdf
http://www.anglo.com.au/_content/documents/537.pdf