- Joined
- 21 June 2009
- Posts
- 5,880
- Reactions
- 14
I was a bit puzzled about this too, Sails. If they were genuinely making up their minds on policy and principles, then what Mr Crook is going to do shouldn't matter. So if it does, then it seems they're making a unity stand a higher priority than their genuine belief about which policies are better for Australia.Interesting that the indies needed to know whether Tony Crook from WA Nats would support the Coalition to govern.
If they were planning to go with labor, I don't think Crook's decision would matter because labor have 74 seats (with Wilke and Bambi) so only takes two more.
Crook has made it clear he can't support labor/green alliance due to the mining tax, so at worst he could refuse to support either party.
So, if the indies are planning to support Coalition, they need to know Crook will also be there to make up 76.
Interesting thought - have I missed something?
Or maybe they are just being "seen" to cover all contingencies...
I was a bit puzzled about this too, Sails. If they were genuinely making up their minds on policy and principles, then what Mr Crook is going to do shouldn't matter. So if it does, then it seems they're making a unity stand a higher priority than their genuine belief about which policies are better for Australia.
Dunno. I'm getting pretty sick of the whole nonsensical carry-on. When the decision is finally made, the three independents will probably suffer from 'irrelevance syndrome' and need counselling.
If Katter has split from the Three Amigos pact and not going to have a joint press conference does anyone read into this that Oakeshott and Windsor are going to the RED camp ----------------> Or is it just my cynical mind working overtime??
Oakeshott :- Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, National Broadband Network, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Aboriginal reconcilliation, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Climate Change Issue, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Non equity between city and country, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Education, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Stability and Outcomes, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble, Dribble,
The Kiwis on the radio couldn't believe the waffle... said thank Christ there is a time limit in parliament. LOL
Does Sir John Kerr have a son?
If so, we need him.
His name is Wayne. No offence intended.
Funny how Oakeshott asked his 4 & 6 year old kids what he shoud do? Maybe we should elect them instead ??
Hah!
As long as he fronts up when the time is right... and it will save Labor having to think up witty pejoritives.:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?