- Joined
- 25 February 2011
- Posts
- 5,688
- Reactions
- 1,231
According to cynic we have to ignore the small scale experiments, ignore the proven knowledge established many decades ago and ignore physics which explains how CO2 scatters infra red radiation, ignore the laser experiment showing the effect working in the atmosphere, ignore the actual warming occurring and ignore the fact that no alternative explanation has been found.
We just need to treat it as a big experiment.
I worry how science is being taught.
Your efforts to misunderstand my stance are most definitely unwelcome and inappropriate!
I am most certainly not saying to ignore anything that has been conclusively proven! I am, however, saying that precious little has been conclusively proven!
The models have, by their repeated failings, proven that the climate is not adequately understood by the "relevant scientists" and, as such, at this juncture, it would seem premature to take any action beyond further investigation (and perhaps also the sacking of the existing body of "relevant scientists" for their blatant incompetence and departure from the practice of actual science).
Before telling us that we're all doomed and that remedial action is urgently required, some of the more rational members of the populace, want to see that some rigorous scientific investigation has served as the basis for such conclusions. More objective science, and less of this apocalyptic religious zealousy, is what is required at this time.
When viewed in isolation to other factors, the effects of elevated concentrations of particular gases in a planetary atmosphere might indicate the possibility of a warming effect. But if there truly exists an adequate understanding of all factors concerned, then why do the projections of the models keep getting it so wrong?