tech/a
No Ordinary Duck
- Joined
- 14 October 2004
- Posts
- 20,447
- Reactions
- 6,478
Neither would I.
But something else pretty dramatic would have to get us down there I would reckon. And if it does, it's kind of irrelevant because we'll all be eating cat food anyway.
As for the XAO and S&P500, and nothing has really changed on the analysis since the last posts - the market is still unfolding with more downside to come.
LOL dont write off cat food in troubled times eithersome mighty fine lookin varietys out there if worse comes to worse and ya cant afford cat food , theres always the cat
That's how I'm trading it.Does anyone want to join me in a possible inverted Head and Shoulders formation for a rally up to 4800?? Come on...say you'll join me...we'll all hold hands and pretend everything is rosy ( because it'll take denial to get us there, and then we'll have room for some of the old ultra-violence once again).
Note some good divergence in the money flow during the H&S formation.
We've already had a run on funds of sorts.Hmm lets try Obama assassinated and a race war in the US.
How about a few more fund collapses and a total run on Funds and banks world wide by panicked investors who are sure they will lose their entire savings.
How about a total collapse of the US/European monetary system.
Impossible?
Your also missing the point of the analysis.
All its doing is pointing to possibilities NOT certainties
The two areas of support are the 2003 low of 2770 followed by 1987 at 1200. I reckon the music might stop at 2770 but wouldn't rule out 1200. What's going to lead XAO to either of these new depths? That's an easy question to answer, the financials. Australia is sitting in the mother of all housing bubbles and while house prices have gone a bit soft this year should they really tank due to a hike in unemployment then our banks, particularly CBA Australia's biggest home loan lender, which is seen as one of the safer banks may suddenly look very risky. Oh and SGB is a joke only being down 26% in the middle of a financial crisis.Neither would I.
But something else pretty dramatic would have to get us down there I would reckon. And if it does, it's kind of irrelevant because we'll all be eating cat food anyway.
Looks like a bump at 3400 ish first IMO, and has been discussed. This level coincides with a few supporting factors.The two areas of support are the 2003 low of 2770 followed by 1987 at 1200. I reckon the music might stop at 2770 but wouldn't rule out 1200.
3200 on the low side to 4800 on the high side are the 2 figures of interest as pork chop points out. Anything in between is boring.
What's 3200 coincide with?
The two areas of support are the 2003 low of 2770 followed by 1987 at 1200. I reckon the music might stop at 2770 but wouldn't rule out 1200. What's going to lead XAO to either of these new depths? That's an easy question to answer, the financials. Australia is sitting in the mother of all housing bubbles and while house prices have gone a bit soft this year should they really tank due to a hike in unemployment then our banks, particularly CBA Australia's biggest home loan lender, which is seen as one of the safer banks may suddenly look very risky. Oh and SGB is a joke only being down 26% in the middle of a financial crisis.
LOL dont write off cat food in troubled times eithersome mighty fine lookin varietys out there if worse comes to worse and ya cant afford cat food , theres always the cat
LOL! Your a funny nun!
Cheers,
CanOz
Now BEARS on the other hand are big and plentifull atm... and mostly starting to tire out, so they're easy prey... except Panda's of course, they're protected.
Ummm. But I have seen in posts on other forums or emails alternative points of view. Some indicate a long (5-7 years) flat period (range bound) vs an up movement after 2 years.
OzWave - there are some "must" and "if" which make it seem conditional. As such, there are alternatives? Are there not?
Tim
PS. This is not a criticism. Just thinking out loud.
OzWaveGuy, I know yours is purely a technical perspective, however does the wave count illustrated be backtested to any periods in the last 50 years? Or even longer I guess, but over similar periods to that illustrated.
Sorry I know very little about EW, however surely if it can be predictive like this it must apply equally to previous periods in the recent past?
Are you fairly agreed that around 3200 would be the bottom and the time to buy in, not for trading but for long term holding ?
lol i love peoples ignorance!, i just hope your not advising anyone!
P.S im not saying 1500 is likely but never say never (remember you dont determine the market but it determines you).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?