- Joined
- 23 September 2008
- Posts
- 919
- Reactions
- 174
Wave (II) down completed today at almost bang on 38% retracement of wave (I), something I was really in favor of. I'm not usually satisfied of a 23% retracement of most waves, until it's evident that the market has moved on from the correction. What's more, the leg down today developed in a clear 5 waves down, thus providing more credibility that wave (II) was a flat (3-3-5 wave formation), in this case with a B wave failure as previously discussed. It looks though the next leg up - wave (III) is forming, and I believe that the chances of wave (II) further correcting with a double flat correction is low considering that it's taken a long time for wave (II) to form v's wave (I) (which formed in 68% of the time wave (II) took to develop). Also, S&P500 futures retraced almost all of last night's move to within 2 points of the 1185 low that was discussed earlier - if it had hit 1185 it would have had me rethink the whole short term view - what's 2 points between friends, right? Right now, the S&P500 futures needs to move up from the current lows and form wave 3 of 3 for the current bullish view to remain intact.
Also, I thought I'd post a snapshot of the real estate sector which displays one of the best Elliottwave Patterns I've ever seen here ---> https://www.aussiestockforums.com/forums/showpost.php?p=341958&postcount=732
The property Trust(XPJ) is not the "real estate" sector.
LOL but no disrespect nor offence intended but my take on the elliot wave spruikers and readers of said patterns have the advantage of being able to change the "pivot " points on a daily basis using new fandango phraseology and numbers quoted until one day they might get it right , gawd bless a freee market hey
AND if the fundamentals of a company alter do you simply stay with your analysis or alter it accordingly.
OR if a trend is broken do you simply ignore it and trade the trend regardless.
This is one of the benifits of Elliott --The analysis tells you WHEN its incorrect and gives you the opportunity to "Reset" it given what is known.
I personally use Elliott in my analysis and has given me just the edge I need.
Ive also posted realtime trades which only seem to get comments if they fail.
AND if the fundamentals of a company alter do you simply stay with your analysis or alter it accordingly.
OR if a trend is broken do you simply ignore it and trade the trend regardless.
This is one of the benifits of Elliott --The analysis tells you WHEN its incorrect and gives you the opportunity to "Reset" it given what is known.
I personally use Elliott in my analysis and has given me just the edge I need.
Ive also posted realtime trades which only seem to get comments if they fail.
The latest Ive made public were these.
https://www.aussiestockforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=12119
Frankly I think comments like these show the lack of experience in analysis.
Perhaps then you'll remain "Nunthewiser"
Instead of a flat (3-3-5), a double zig-zag formed which displays as two a-b-c (5-3-5) corrections separated by an X wave as shown). Picking the type of correction is like pulling hens teeth until the correction is just about over.
I too use elliot amongst other other tools but basically at the end of the day it is merely another view from behind until someone gueeses it right then they sing how accurate they or there methods used were.
So..? Up, Down tomorrow..? What do you think..?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?