- Joined
- 16 February 2008
- Posts
- 2,906
- Reactions
- 2
As mentioned earlier, I notice exemptions to rules like that one and it seems to me the current circumstances qualify.
This is one reason I like the way Nick implements EW analysis, basic rules and only a few guidelines, keeps it simple, yet logical.
I understand what you guys are saying, but can I draw your attention to the exceptions.
This rule holds for all non-leveraged cash basis markets.
Are you telling me the share market is non-leveraged these days?
as of a day or two ago,
Not too late in an accelerating trend?
Miner uses E.Wave in a much more basic fashion than Nick Radge.Very simple is his motto.He doesn't label complex corrective moves where as Nick does.
Who knows which is better ? I prefer the more complex personally, but either works.
This rule holds for all non-leveraged cash basis markets.
Are you telling me the share market is non-leveraged these days?
even clearer as W is forcing not only his view of EW but also his view of the market to substantiate his response.You are exhibiting a classic example of forcing your own opinion and bias into the analysis.
Ill bet he still holds to the 3 foundation rules of Elliott.
This statement makes Radges observation
even clearer as W is forcing not only his view of EW but also his view of the market to substantiate his response.
Harmless in discussion but damaging if you have a 100k of long trades on based on fallacious analysis.
Harmless in discussion but damaging if you have a 100k of long trades on based on fallacious analysis.
Its not about how you cross the road either.
But you dont step out in front of a bus---do you?
All part of "managing" wouldnt you say?
IMO analysis will continue to be all important.
I totally agree---but its not what makes you the money!
The other consideration is the configuration of the component waves.
In an impulse, waves 1 & 3 (and 5) must be 5 wavers, either diagonal triangles or impulsive. Wave 3 must be impulsive.
We don't see this in the current pattern, the component waves are all corrective.
Baboom.
The other consideration is the configuration of the component waves.
In an impulse, waves 1 & 3 (and 5) must be 5 wavers, either diagonal triangles or impulsive. Wave 3 must be impulsive.
I guess it's stuff like this that convinces me (again) not to do waves.
A simplistic view of the chart leads me to conclude it will test support again at around 5100, and what happens after that depends on what opens O/S.
Anyone really, really sure I'm wrong?
If doing wave counts yourself is a problem you can always do what I do and 'outsource' your counting
I guess it's stuff like this that convinces me (again) not to do waves.
A simplistic view of the chart leads me to conclude it will test support again at around 5100, and what happens after that depends on what opens O/S.
Anyone really, really sure I'm wrong?
Since the decline started all the so called experts have been so sure it was going to be the biggest recession, even depression in the US and spread to Aus and world wide. But we haven't had a single quarter of negative growth yet and now some of those experts are starting to say there won't be a recession, the concern is more inflationary.
"I think we're heading for a recession," said at the Reuters Investment Outlook Summit in New York. He stressed that he was speaking from his personal opinion, not that of the NBER, the unofficial arbiter of U.S. recessions."My sense is that the risk to overall GDP growth over the next six months is still very significant," he added.
The Cambridge, Massachusetts-based NBER has not declared a recession and is unlikely to do so for many months. Feldstein, who is also an economics professor at Harvard University in Cambridge, will step down from his NBER post at the end of the month."
Ill bet he still holds to the 3 foundation rules of Elliott.
Simple or Complex what does your EW tell you?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?