This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Why are we saying 'sorry' to the aboriginals?!

Ok, Julia, I hear your message.

Of course our society must care for those who can't care properly for themselves, and that will embrace the disabled and the mentally ill. Unfortunately our (state) Government has swung the pendulum the other way, and taking away the residential care system (remniscent of the old 'asylum' image I guess) and put people out into the community. Unfortunately they are not willing to put the required support mechanisms in place to ensure that they have the capacity to do this. But the Government did not create mental illness. It did however, create the stolen generation.

The 'sorry' part for me, only comes from the forced separation of infants from their family, simply because we thought the white way was better for raising children, and ignoring the fact that families were torn apart. The end did not justify the means. As simple as that.

The rest - well, we havent exactly gone about things in a culturally sensisitive manner - we just assumed that they were primitive, we were advanced and of course they would want to do things our way? But that was never what the sorry was all about though.

And yes, their sense of self esteem and determination will come from working with them, to build and develop those things they see as important; educating their children so they become the teachers, Doctors and Nurses they need for their own people; working with them to develop appropriate health regimes and in a manner that values their own traditions and customs. Not assuming that our way is the best way. So yes, empowering them is what they need, not the handouts nor benevolent (sometimes) power we have used in the past.
 

I do not believe what I read at times.

What has blown up in who's face?

Aboriginal people have a right to claim compensation through the legal system same as anyone else. The federal government is not automatically paying out compensation but if anyone wants to try to claim tis their right. Are you suggesting (along with others) THEY SHOULD STILL CONTINUE TO BE TREATED DIFFERENTLY and not have the same rights we enjoy.?
 
We hear of all the bad things that happened to the stolen generation but what about all the good things, we dont hear of the ones that have made a good life, theres no thankyou from them...what about the baby's of unmarried (white) mothers that where taken away and the children brought over from England during WW1 all this was done for their supposedly good they dont ask for a sorry or compensation....how many of those aboriginals who attended the "Sorry" day held at several venues actually work......and most you wouldnt have known they were aboriginal...as they were mostly white....where does it stop, when are you not classed as an aboriginal, when you are 1/4 or 1/8 or does it go on and on......I think we should only help the full blooded aboriginals.... why I feel for the ones who really have had it tough through no fault of their own, I dont for the ones who want to bludge on taxpayers money.......and blame the whites for all their troubles....
 

Of course they may have appeared white. The stolen generation were not full blood.
 
We hear of all the bad things that happened to the stolen generation but what about all the good things, we dont hear of the ones that have made a good life, theres no thankyou from them.......

OK, thankyou from taking me away from the mother who wanted me and looked after me!

There, does that make you feel better (not that I was, but sheesh!)
what about the baby's of unmarried (white) mothers that where taken away .......

We all agree, that is wrong too!

and the children brought over from England during WW1 all this was done for their supposedly good they dont ask for a sorry or compensation.......

Maybe they should, what was done to them by the British Government was very wrong too, but they wont apologise.
I think we should only help the full blooded aboriginals

I think we have probably killed most of the full blooded aboriginals off
 
the children brought over from England during WW1 all this was done for their supposedly good they dont ask for a sorry or compensation....

Ah.. yeah, they did. They got a very large compo payout from the WA government last year. So check your facts!
 
Government pays out compensation all over the place and even for reasons that relate to workplace conditions that have lead to health issues. Not our fault, not the present day government's fault but hey as long as they are not aboriginal who cares?

Horse flu compensation, now that one is a beauty, we do not mind compensating the gambling indutstry. Guess we have our priorities right.
 

aboriginals get weekly compensation as well as many other benefits thats the point i am getting at

the claims being filed are like the icing on the cake for them
 

Thanks for your posts Prospector have enjoyed the whole discussion but your posts have echoed my own views much more eloquently than what I could contribute

Focus
 
Second that Focus, very hard to write nicely when the only source of education on aboriginal issues for some seems to come from the latest racist email doing the rounds. Yet Prospector has written very well. Very hard when such ignorance abounds, I have not been able to write half what I wanted I have burned with so much anger.
 
aboriginals get weekly compensation as well as many other benefits thats the point i am getting at

the claims being filed are like the icing on the cake for them
Exactly what are you getting at?
Aboriginals get what the Social Security Act allows by way of pensions and benefits that non-aboriginals are also entitled to receive.
What are the "other benefits"?
Earlier deaths?
Greater prevalence of disease?
Poor infrastraucture?
Highest costs of foodstuffs in Australia?

Perhaps your ignorance is the icing on the cake given that no claims have been filed (can I assume for being stolen?).
 

Try yours Red...

and you forgot to add...

*Sex abuse

*Violence

*No job opportunity

*Booze

Exactly what YOU posted is why many many years ago some thought the best way to give a child from that type environment in that community a chance was to do what was done....

As in a previous post "you don't hear of the good things" that resulted from these actions... and none of the Sorry Fan Club has yet posted a Law or even a tabled Bill by an Australian Federal government that aimed at wiping out the AB race... why .. because it never happened...

You think that there will be no claims for money ?... lol .. yeh and Haneef was 100% innocent.... lol.... (so were the 9/11 high jackers until 9/11...get it !!!!! )
 
aboriginals get weekly compensation as well as many other benefits thats the point i am getting at

the claims being filed are like the icing on the cake for them

I heard about few more -

Children get – shoe money – correct me if my information is wrong but this used to be $2.50 for every day ab child shows face at school.

There are special low interest or even no interest loans, how come I cannot get it, probably wrong race in our non-racial society

People who should be on the same rate of pay are not on the same rate of pay, go figure.

Special travelling allowances.

Not to mention no need for fishing license in Australia, in supposedly non-racial Australia

There are probably more, but not published freely, wander why?
 
And post-sorry snippets just keep coming


"And to put a figure of 30, 40,000 on some of those cases is an insult to the people who have suffered terribly."

If $40,000 is an insult, then probably $140M WA suffering money will swell to something that is not perceived as an insult.

Time will tell how sorry we will feel, after all the sorry money is handed over.
 

Those white fathers of the stolen generation sure do have a lot to answer for.
 
Not a single fact above, so maybe some sources to the lies would be handy.
 

You sure are a lazy, ignorant pest Superfly. I've told you before that the information is easy to find in the archives or google. I will highlight a couple examples. Do yourself a favour and do some research before ranting on such nonsense.

Firstly there was no federal government when the first laws were enacted.

Federation didn't occur until 1901. The first colonies eventualy became states of a federal Australia in 1901.

The following is one of the first laws enacted to limit the rights and control Aboriginals. When you read the acts you will see that words like 'protection' are used as an idiom, even completely contradictory.


Happy, your comment below is silly because 'Australian' referes to a country, nationality, whereas 'Aboriginal' is a race, more specifically considered 'native to'.

If one can become Australian Citizen, surely there must an equivalent to become Aboriginal.

Just to be clear, whether or not you were aboriginal was written into the law. These half-cast people were designated aboriginal by the law of the time which pretty much stayed in force to about the 1960's.

The following from the above legislation "Who to be deemed aboriginals".

8. Every aboriginal native of Australia and every aboriginal halfcaste
or child of a half-caste, such half-caste or child habitually
associating and living with aboriginals, shall be deemed to be an
aboriginal within the meaning of this Act; and at the hearing of any case
the justice adjudicating may, in the absence of other sufficient evidence,
decide on his own view and judgment whether any person with reference
to whom any proceedings shall have been taken under this Act is or is not
an aboriginal.​

Controls over Aboriginal people were largely exercised through government-appointed authorities, such as the Aborigines Protection Board in NSW (re-named in 1940 the Aborigines Welfare Board).

Aboriginals were generally wards of the state by law. Among other things the wages and entitlements of many aboriginals were confiscated by the government, but for some nominal pocket money.

The commonwealth government hosted an initial conference of Commonwealth and State Aboriginal authorities in Canberra on 21-23 April 1937. The purpose was to unify and better coordinate the official and uniffical policies if the states to breed out half casts and remove full blood aboriginals to remote reservation and limit access.

The Law was ammended in 1943 to provide for the reconstitution of the Aborigines Welfare Board ; to constitute the Aborigines Welfare Board a body corporate, and to extend its powers, authorities, duties and functions ; for these and other purposes to amend the Aborigines Protection Act, 1909-1940 ; and for purposes connected therewith. http://www1.aiatsis.gov.au/exhibitions/legislations/pdfs/nsw/vn71409-16x_a.pdf
 

Attachments

  • New Picture.jpg
    98.7 KB · Views: 145
Not a single fact above, so maybe some sources to the lies would be handy.


Calling somebody racist and liar is overused and so popular that I should not bother to reply to your post.

Little quote from WA fishieries dept webpage to provide you with that SINGLE FACT to support alleged lies.

https://secure.fish.wa.gov.au/fisheries/TCForm.jsp



You prove that the rest is not true.
 
Happy, your comment below is silly because 'Australian' referes to a country, nationality, whereas 'Aboriginal' is a race, more specifically considered 'native to'.

Silly me, sorry for that, I understand now, Australia is non-racial providing that ab race gets different treatment from all the other possible races.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...