- Joined
- 10 July 2004
- Posts
- 2,913
- Reactions
- 3
Well, with John Howard likely to lose his seat, it's perhaps timely to ask "Who do you think would make the best leader of the new Liberal opposition?"
Well, with John Howard likely to lose his seat, it's perhaps timely to ask "Who do you think would make the best leader of the new Liberal opposition?"
Crean.
I think he is the only politician absolutely guaranteed of keeping interest rates low.
Turnbull will lead the Coalition into the next election.
However, Turnbull is not likely to make any moves yet.
The mud of defeat needs to be well stuck on Costello so that his party will see he is a no go for PM.
Turnbull needs to get his numbers up, too.
And just as Rudd slid under the radar, so too will Turnbull.
Turnbull is about as close as a Lib can get to a "Rudd" and this will make the next contest very, very interesting.
Turnball or Hockey????
That's like Latham and Beazley.
What a terrible choice. There must be someone else.
Crean? He is in the government now. Think the Finance gig will go to Lindsay Tanner rather than Crean.
With both Howard & Costello gone, there does seem to be a bit of a power vacuum.
Not sure if Hockey is tough enough to be an effective opposition leader, he plays the likeability card too much, and isn't nerdy enough to play the "me too" game Rudd perfected.
Turnbull may be inexperienced in parliamentary terms however is the only one who appears able to do the job effectively (Abbott could head-kick for a year or so but who would ever vote for that Darlek?).
With both Howard & Costello gone, there does seem to be a bit of a power vacuum.
Not sure if Hockey is tough enough to be an effective opposition leader, he plays the likeability card too much, and isn't nerdy enough to play the "me too" game Rudd perfected.
Turnbull may be inexperienced in parliamentary terms however is the only one who appears able to do the job effectively (Abbott could head-kick for a year or so but who would ever vote for that Darlek?).
spot on also AJ.Aussiejeff said:I guess this is the price the Libs have to pay for relying so exclusively on the One Man Band - John Howard's personality and experience for most of the last 11 years and in the final runup to the election. Costello's role was only dragged out of the barrel at the last moment, really. It always exposed the party to the risk that has actually played out - that is, if Howard fell, they had no real depth to fall back on. Now, more than ever they really DO have to form a TEAM approach to working effectively in opposition. Or as I have postulated, they could end up in the cold for some considerable time.
"IT’S A MORAL" SAYS JOHNNY
....
“It’s a shoe in” said the Labor poll
a “moral” said the Libs,
Last night we searched the nation’s soul
on which we thought were fibs,
tomorrow there’s a change of guard
and Johnny’s a “has-been”,
and the other Libs go back to work
on “what does moral mean”. .
I guess this is the price the Libs have to pay for relying so exclusively on the One Man Band - John Howard's personality and experience for most of the last 11 years and in the final runup to the election. Costello's role was only dragged out of the barrel at the last moment, really. It always exposed the party to the risk that has actually played out - that is, if Howard fell, they had no real depth to fall back on.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.