- Joined
- 21 April 2014
- Posts
- 7,956
- Reactions
- 1,072
As I mentioned Luutzu, all three were shot, by the stalinists.
Ronald Reagan, Margaret Thatcher, and John Paul II all survived assassination attempts, and brought down Soviet Communism
https://www.whitehouse.gov/about-the-white-house/presidents/
As the left surges back, Marxism’s bloody legacy is covered up
https://life.spectator.co.uk/2017/09/as-the-left-surges-back-marxisms-bloody-legacy-is-covered-up/
Donald Trump shouldn't be President for a 1001 reasons. 1002 if you count his (alleged) sexual deviance.
Yep practically every President has had some irregularity in their personal lives. Whether its President Rosovelts mistress, President Kennedys myriad affairs and so on.
In my view what takes Donald Trumps behaviour into a totally different league is the alleged use of jealousy and revenge to get iunto bed with his friends wives. I reckon that is pretty beathtaking. It will be interesting to see what sort of fallout comes from that little bombshell.
The critical question is whether he goes Wag the Dog and tries to start a war to deflect attention. Certainly has plenty of opportunity.
Communism is what did them in. Gorbachev tried to modernise communism the people got a taste of freedom and bye bye communist oppression.Just wondering how exactly did Reagan, Thatcher and the Pope "brought down Soviet Communism"?
How did they do it? Exactly?
My understanding, and I could be wrong 'cause it was never assigned reading... but I thought that the Soviets collapsed because it went bankrupt. Not because the mighty three fought it and won.
Sure, there's that theory of Reagan waging a bunch of "wars" and arms races, luring the Soviets into outdoing the US/West and so sent it broke. I'm sure sure how true that is though.
I thought it was just the usual imperial expansion, taking neighbouring countries, liberating barbarians (and capitalists), getting into quagmires etc., that eventually broke the treasury and call for a retreat.
I did know a bit about Mikhail Gorbachev agreeing with Bush Snr (the smart one) and James Baker to let East Germany uniting back with West Germany. All on the promise that the West will not move "an inch" east... which it immediately sets about doing and is now at the gates of Moscow.
That, to me, sounds like the Soviets leadership recognising that endless wars and imperialism might not doing them any more favour. So they drew up their borders, try to keep what they've taken and call it a day.
And here's the thing... The Soviets didn't go completely broke and become a poor laughing stock because of its godless Communism. It get to that state because "capitalism" happened to it under Yeltsin.
Yes, the drunk one who got democratically elected under new Russia after the Soviet collapse.
Under American advise, Yeltsin privatise practically all of Russia's industries. Hand it to a handful of friends who know friends who takes the cash out of Russia.
Communism is what did them in. Gorbachev tried to modernise communism the people got a taste of freedom and bye bye communist oppression.
US was weakening their economy through santions and driving the oil price down. So yes it was all to do with Regan Thatcher etc.
Russia was an oppressive regime and the people had enough.
Nothing to do with capitalism in Russia.
I'm wondering where Melania Trump stands in all these revelations - particularly where Donald is jumping his friends wives by setting up the speaker phone scenarios.
I think she could just snap call up Mueller, say she had had enough and wants to turn. Whether she jumps first or we see the inevitable confession/confirmation from one of Don's friends waits to be seen.
I think there should be a (betting) book on this scenario. ..
Restricted freedom and people getting restless.Can't be a simple "communism" ideology.
I'm not saying Communism is the kind of gov't I'd want to live under, nor should anyone. But "communism", aka, socialism... that can't be the reason why the Soviets collapsed.
For one, the Soviets survived WWII. WWI ended 1917, Lenin's Red took over the same year or so?
They managed to rebuild, or at least kept the country alive, from WWI and through WWII when the Nazi almost destroyed the entire place.
To come out of those wars... and came from what was an agrarian peasant society under the Czars... then became the sole competitor to the mighty Uncle Sam. In both geopolitics, science and military might... That's not really a failed system.
Maybe the Soviets plebs weren't as rich as the average Americans, not as free... But they weren't Third World level poverty either. Not saying it was paradise, but I think they also have State welfare, free healthcare too.
It was the Chicago Boys that advised Yeltsin to go full neocon.. .privatisation of state enterprises for next to nothing; ending social welfare programmes etc. Those policies did more harm to the Soviets than oil prices shrinking its economy.
Just wondering how exactly did Reagan, Thatcher and the Pope "brought down Soviet Communism"?
.
They were certainly pivotal. The Catholics gave support to Lech Walesa's Solidarity movement in Poland which started the first real rebellion. Thatcher and Reagan recognised the USSR was in financial crisis and changed the policy of status quo to aggressive build up of weaponry in Europe putting the USSR on notice they were going to retaliate rather than defend if the nonsense continued.
The Falkland war was the tactical masterstroke that showed the USSR that Britain was no longer acquiescing. It resulted in the Argentine junta getting the heave ho and the beginning of democratisation of repressive regimes around the world.
Tear down that war Mr Gorbachev
Restricted freedom and people getting restless.
They were protesting in Hong Kong over trains being changed and the people feeling like the mainland was impinging on their rights. Once people have a taste they will fight for it.I don't think people ever rise up because they wanted freedom or free speech and the likes.
I think my politico professor was right that practically all wars, civil wars I think the context was, were all over taxes.
People can put up with oppression, I mean it's not like they have a choice in it. But one thing they can't put up with, not for too long, is starvation. I guess unless the gov't instantly starve them then the plebs can't do much about it (ala China's great famine where Mao's idiotic policies kill about 20 million Chinese; or Stalin's etc.)...
But in general, as long as people have enough food just to survive... be given some hope, and there's plenty of that with posters and slogans and movies... they'll just find other outlets and keep their heads down.
It's not a pleasant environment, but it's better than dying I guess.
So revolution, in China or in other oppressive countries... wouldn't happen until things get real desperate and there are little to no hope to do otherwise but revolt. That or until a foreign liberator nudges a few well placed colonels a bit.
They were protesting in Hong Kong over trains being changed and the people feeling like the mainland was impinging on their rights. Once people have a taste they will fight for it.
Russia had a taste- Hollywood, Rockbands and all the other media blasting the Russians on what they were missing out on. Wearing santions on top of overbearing corrupt officials and people had enough.
Russia today and the youth are fighting back. Iran, China even Turkey tried. Give it time because the youth are going to change the guard.
I don't mean that they like the comrades in charge, they hate those bastards as much as we like our politicians. So they put up with how things are and try to put food on the table and stay away from prison, or politicians and the police.
The thing Communist China has going for it is that if the comrades economic policies fail to impress, or employ, the Chinese enough, they could just start a war or two and it'll unite the people behind them in a heartbeat. That's not to mention the kind of industrial demand and employment needed to serve the war effort... Keynesian economics with firepower right there.
Compare that to the US... It's a bit harder to unite the American people behind another war. Unless it's the kind of enemy that literally tore up Pearl Harbour, or Guam... I just don't see the average American lining up to enlist in the draft.
As aboveIf there's a war, it'll be these poor kids or their parents or elder siblings that will go to fight it.
I don't think their heart will be in it.
Living like that stifles creativity and innovation, which is one of, if not the greatest strength, the US has.
The Chinese don't understand because they believe in force and fear. That is a huge mistake, which is becoming even more prevalent as they put all the Big Brother tech on the streets so you can't even jay walk because the CCP have your walking style coded and know it's you from a distance. So all the people become too scarred to do anything so that destroys productivity, innovation, motivation - the economy.
Most sane countries and their warlords would only ever drone states that cannot, or will not, fight back. China won't be hitting the US... I'm sure the US won't be the first to strike China either.The argument about the American use of drones is far more applicable to this scenario! Further the scenario is almost redundant because starting a war at this stage of the tense game is universally recognized as catastrophic. So that's getting harder for the dictators who universally point to foreign influence as soon as their is any strife with the people. It's dictator play 101.
Look into to your own blindsided bias which is fogging your thinking like a Chomsky fairy tale posing as analysis.
They no longer have to, it's all about innovation and tech, you know - that which thrives in freedom.
Most of the western recruits no longer even need to leave the shore or ship and they get paid better and are motivated. They have something to fight for.
All the Chinese Communist slaves being dictated to and recruited against their will, most of them, have is their shadow dwelling psychopathic CCP multi billionaire oligarchs that use the people to enrich and protect themselves to the most extreme degree ever accomplished on earth ever!!
As above
You really gotta get out of your bubble.
There is a saying in Silicon Valley and it's not from Confucius - 'What ever is band in China is the next big thing!'
The only Asians that are super patriotic are the Thais and Japanese.
Chinese don't really give a stuff, business focused. Their govt does though.
Once US gets rid of trump we might see a clearer path. But China set all their strategy in motion years ago. Trump being in power just made it easier. Obama was asleep at the wheel.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?