Value Collector
Have courage, and be kind.
- Joined
- 13 January 2014
- Posts
- 12,237
- Reactions
- 8,483
No Tink, I said I stand up for people's rights to think and walk however they like, as long as they are not harming anyone or infringing the rights of others.
I said people can have what ever beliefs they want, they just can't force those mythologies onto others.
You are more "commo" than me Tink, you are the one trying to instill an idea of a national religion, and trying to turn children into little brain washed robots by instilling that "one true religion" into schools.
My concept of religious freedom and freedom from religion has nothing to do with forcing ideas onto people, that's what you are trying to do.
Section 116 of the Constitution of Australia precludes the Commonwealth of Australia (i.e., the federal parliament) from making laws for establishing any religion, imposing any religious observance, or prohibiting the free exercise of any religion. Section 116 also provides that no religious test shall be required as a qualification for any office or public trust under the Commonwealth. The product of a compromise in the pre-Federation constitutional conventions, Section 116 is based on similar provisions in the United States Constitution. However, Section 116 is more narrowly drafted than its US counterpart, and does not preclude the states of Australia from making such laws.
Section 116 has been interpreted narrowly by the High Court of Australia: while the definition of "religion" adopted by the court is broad and flexible, the scope of the protection of religions is circumscribed. The result of the court's approach has been that no court has ever ruled a law to be in contravention of Section 116, and the provision has played only a minor role in Australian constitutional history. Among the laws that the High Court has ruled not to be in contravention of Section 116 are laws that provided government funding to religious schools, that authorised the dissolution of a branch of the Jehovah's Witnesses, and that enabled the forcible removal of Indigenous Australian children from their families.
Federal Governments have twice proposed the amendment of Section 116, principally to apply its provisions to laws made by the states. On each occasion””in 1944 and 1988””the proposal failed in a referendum.
You are pushing your own beliefs and religion on others, with your own social engineering, brainwashing the children.
Good luck with that policy when raising kids.
I'm not sure some religious (read e.g. Anglican) doctrine isn't of benefit creating a reinforcing boundary that children can identify with.
Secondly, Me saying you have no right to force a state religion based on your Christian mythologies is not the same as me pushing my own beliefs on others.
Why don't you tell the same thing to the Wahabis who want Sharia law enforced on us and who have already done it in other countries around the world ?
Tink like freedom of speech, but only if it aligns with her views, and she seems to be against freedom of thought.
Anyway, this is probably more appropriate in the Religion thread as it has nothing to do with racism.
Even though posters have skewed a little off track, I think it relates because we were discussing the impact of our Christian culture on other races and their religions. In fact I'd say that the people being offended by our hymms, nativity scenes and the like are racists.
It's not the hymns of nativity scene themselves that offends me, feel free to have a nativity scene at your church, home, front lawn, even at any privately owned business, my local westfields has a nativity scene right now, I have no problem with that.Even though posters have skewed a little off track, I think it relates because we were discussing the impact of our Christian culture on other races and their religions. In fact I'd say that the people being offended by our hymms, nativity scenes and the like are racists.
They have come into our culture and are offend by it?
Well excuse me for not giving a fig. When in Rome buddy!
Not really, Christianity is a religion, not a race. They are offended because it's not their religion, but as you say, tough luck to them.
Their kids should not have to attend hymn singing if they don't want to but neither should schools be afraid to celebrate what we have been traditionally celebrating for centuries.
Anyway, I believe the Koran regards Jesus as a prophet of God so I don't see why Muslims should object to a bit of celebration for him.
It's not the hymns of nativity scene themselves that offends me, feel free to have a nativity scene at your church, home, front lawn, even at any privately owned business, my local westfields has a nativity scene right now, I have no problem with that.
But, I will be offended if a nativity scene appears at a school or government building or is government funded, because public schools should not be teaching children religious myths are facts or teaching them to practice a certain faith, if the nativity scene was part of a broader program teaching children about many religions it might be ok, but certainly not giving one religion a special place.
If you want to learn and practice Christian mythology, that's fine, but why force it on others.
Maybe it would be a good idea if Christian and Muslim kids celebrated together at each others festivals ? Might bring them together instead of alienating one side.
I don't think this should be a Federal/State policy, the schools should be able to decide for themselves from the following options
* no religious celebrations at all
* traditional celebrations with opt out for those parents that don't want their kids to attend
* multi faith celebrations where all are welcome.
Schools should not be afraid to celebrate what we have been traditionally celebrating for centuries.
And that is the bottom line, Rumpole, in my view.
VC, Christmas has been here long before your Political Correctness and Victim mentality.
Our Christian Culture, which you have enjoyed and are enjoying, all these years, and now you are complaining.
Your own agenda of not wanting to hear about families, children, happiness and all things associated with Christmas.
The reason for the season.
If you want to live in China or North Korea, where no singing is allowed, off you go.
Don't try and transform this country into that.
That is exactly what they do there.
Well said, Craton.
Well excuse me for not giving a fig. When in Rome buddy!
-------------------------
- The betrayal foretold by Orwell, which came into being by force in the Soviet Empire, is coming into being by consent, in the West
Lol, as I said Tink I am fine with celebrating the secular Aussie version of Christmas, eg family children happiness Santa presents prawns wine beer etc I love Christmas, just don't preach your religion to children, stick to the secular version.
If you want your secular festivities at a certain time of the year it might be polite, or even honest to acknowledge their origin, or abandon them altogether.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?