This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Western athletes boycott the Beijing Olympics?

Should western athletes boycott the Beijing Olympics

  • Yes

    Votes: 30 34.1%

  • No

    Votes: 58 65.9%
  • Total voters
    88
Jump to new
disarray, you give communist propaganda way too much credit. From a logical point of view, if the Chinese wanted to take over internet discussions, it would be an impossible task. Take the firewall example, Chinese that want to get around it can easily do it. And even their own people criticise their government freely on Chinese discussion forums.

So what Tibet discussion forums are you referring to? How do you know they are Chinese propaganda spreaders? Does that let me accuse you for working for CIA? Have you thought may be there are a few people out there that have a different view and want to (gasp!) discuss it?

If Chinese propaganda was so powerful they would use it for better gains, eg, spam this forum with downrampers so the Chinese can take over our iron ore companies. Anyway, there no need to debunk that argument.


Falun gong is an outlawed cult in China, and cult is by western standards. You cannot compare that. Every culture has extremists. Now I dont know about your taxi driver, but keep an eye out for more repressed Chinese.

As I said equality is a big issue in China and is the source of many problems. Dont confuse that with repression.

ps, if you want to grill me on grammar, read the posts by the Superfly, the thread starter.
Superfly said:
Juw... ur an Chinese embassy staffer right ?
Click to expand...

2020hindsight: Thanks for that. I wonder why communists dont modify wikipedia like our government does.
 
Superfly said:
Maybe comrade Juw has been shot for non-performance, ( in a ditch ) ...
Click to expand...

A lot of racial hate in this thread. Ops?

 
For the record, I highly doubt you're some agent of the Chinese Government but I do want to drill down on some of your points.
juw177 said:
If Chinese propaganda was so powerful they would use it for better gains, eg, spam this forum with downrampers so the Chinese can take over our iron ore companies.
Click to expand...
I doubt that money or natural resources would be the key driver of any government-based propaganda. I'd say its more likely that debunking the alleged ills of the Chinese government would be atleast as important. Dictatorship isn't about money, it's about power and control. Moderating international opinion would be a key element of maintaining domestic control of China.

juw177 said:
Please note it is racist when you generalise a population of 1.5 billion.
Click to expand...
No it's not. Please see the definition of racist.

juw177 said:
As I said equality is a big issue in China and is the source of many problems. Dont confuse that with repression.
Click to expand...
Both may be an issue, but there appears to be strong evidence of repression when it comes to religious freedom, freedom of expression, freedom of the press, freedom of information and various other freedoms that the Western World would consider reasonable.

But to bring this back on topic, I think it should come down to the individual athlete. If they feel their attendence at the Olympics adds credibility to what they believe is a repressive government, I think they should vote with their feet. Sport shouldn't be political and governments shouldn't make decisions for their athletes, but athletes are people too and they need to be able to sleep at night.
 
Fact remains (back to thread, and getting off the personal namecalling - whether or not it lowers the tone of the ASF - which I would have thought was obvious, but moving on)

Fact remains that the Dalai Lama doesn't want to boycott the games.
Our sportsmen and women don't either

or if they do, it'll only be a few - and it will be THEIR CALL.

I doubt they will be guided by you superfly.
Perhaps get yourself on the team - and then you will have the privelege of personally boycotting it, even if you're the only one.
 
I'm sorry, I must have missed the name calling.

If you mean this:

Superfly said:
Maybe comrade Juw has been shot for non-performance, ( in a ditch ) ...
Click to expand...

Well, it looks to me like an ill conceived attempt at humour.
 
doctorj said:
For the record, I highly doubt you're some agent of the Chinese Government but I do want to drill down on some of your points.
Click to expand...

Certainly.

In regards to international opinion, I have already made my point about our media and examples of outright distortion in reporting. The Chinese government never had a single chance since Tiennaman square to sway the common western opinion. It is a lost cause. Why would they resort to censorship?

Agree there is repression in freedom of information and press. Do not agree on repression of religious freedom (EDIT: for the post Mao period!)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_of_the_People's_Republic_of_China

There are I think 56 recognised minorities (tibet included) in China and there is a national cultural day every year to celebrate. Laws are relaxed for certain minorities, eg, exemption from one child policy, exemption from tax, and legalised polygomy if it is in their culture to do so. Imagine western governments doing that for their minorities.

Also note Falun Gong is a cult (lots to read about here) and the crackdown is justified, but I do not support the way it is handled.
 
In regards to post about Chinese multiculture, it can be easily found in travel guides.
http://www.travelchinaguide.com/intro/festival/

But back to my point that the problem is inequality caused by modernisation, I stumbled upon this. Every modernised country had to go through the same thing and for China it is especially difficult due to the size and variety of cultures. Because of that I do not believe it is a valid reason to boycott the games.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/3962151.stm
 

disarray - The lady who was shot against the wall was allegedy guilty of manslaughter (so says the sign according to our chinese interpreter poster). Personally I find capital punishment disgusting, but you don't as I recall.

not really a ditch although it's not much better I concede.

But my point is that you waver a bit on this one disarray - first impression anyway - here's what you said about the Death Penalty elsewhere ( Death Panalty thread #426 i think)

 
bit of a stretch 2020. given our court system, its transparency, and constant review by the media and government i would be more confident of its implimentation here. however in china there is controversy over its use, especially against dissidents and the whole harvesting organs from executed prisoners thing. i'm not disputing chinas right to practice capital punishment, but its nature and implementation has questions hanging over it, and it is relevant to this issue.

juw i think you are being overly defensive. i know china is undergoing a huge social upheaval, at the same time asserting itself as a global power on the world stage. thats great, i respect chinese history and think they are
playing on the global stage well, but with this comes greater scrutiny. when china rattles its sabre over taiwan and south china sea, or wants to showcase itself to the world by hosting the olympics, then people will rightfully want to know what makes china tick.

you seem to believe that critcism of china is overly negative in western media, and think pro-tibet sentiment exists because the dalai lama is a good actor and gweilo just swallow whatever the tv feeds them. this is not the case, the west is sympathetic to tibet because the dalai lama is a man of peace in word and action, while the chinese government has a reputation for oppression. it seems entirely probable to me, without media input, that the tibetan people are oppressed because of recent history and events in the region, and because of the character of the chinese communist party.

i am trying to get where you are coming from. you appear to be a strongly pro-chinese and anti-media, and thats fine, thats your view. i'm not accusing you of being part of some propaganda conspiracy, and i apologise if i offended you by commenting on your spelling. i'm just putting these things together so i can get a better idea of who you are, then it helps understand where you come from, because like i said, the west generally sympathises with tibet so your view is interesting.
 
It is quite funny when I do a search of posts from the people putting me down:

disarray agrees with capital punishment

Aussie2Aussie thinks indigenous people have too much benefits in Australia: "My Great, Great Uncle was stolen, can I have $50,000 for the emotional trauma that this caused me."

Superfly (world war 3 thread) believes Iran is developing nuclear bombs even though US intelligence say otherwise (hint: Bush ignores US intelligence). Thinks Iran should be liberated amongst other pro US right wing comments.
"The US could probably decimate mainland China with its submarine fleet alone.."


disarray, thanks for trying to see it from another point of view. Though the reason for western sympathy for Tibet is a bit more complicated than that. eg, You say west like Tibet because Dalai Lama is peaceful, then why do they like violent rioters? If history taught us anything does the west, on their "higher moral ground" ever intervene with other countries out of the goodness of their heart?

Of course for the other side, Chinese nationalism is not without a few blindspots either.

Also I couldnt find any proof of the organ harvesting. Just allegations according to wiki.
 
What's the relevance of any of this to this thread?
 
doctorj said:
What's the relevance of any of this to this thread?
Click to expand...

*sigh* I will spell it out for you then.
1. Captial punishment: we are boycotting the games to protest against human rights in China, one of the violations being captial punishment.

2. Indigenous people: the Tibet protests are about "cultural genocide", discrimination against minorities and inhabiting their land.

3. Superfly believes the whole US patriotism (super army, stop terrorists and nuclear programs in middle east, anti china, etc) Started this thread. Accuses me of being communist.... brilliant.



If they are so quick to dis my (relatively) pro-china views they should be consistent.
 
agree that our system is 3000% better than theirs.
not perfect obviously - and that's why the "radical left-wingers" in our society - like Amnesty International etc - go into bat when there's a miscarriage of justice. (and/or watch completely new legal ground being covered, like Hicks or Haneef etc, - Superfly's first post - and arguably new legal ground screwed up in the process)

The Chinese trick of sending a bill for the bullet to the parents of the person done away with is pretty sickening as well. (imo of course).

Back to thread, fwiw, I'd be bludy amazed if there aren't heaps of demonstations against the Chinese in the next few months ( till August) - it's a once in a lifetime chance for the Tibetan demonstrators (gee nearly called em left wingers) to get real publicity. Just that I don;t think our swimmers and other sportspeople deserve to take the full brunt of it. -

And superfly, I'd be amazed if your house (like mine or anyone else's) didn't have twenty items made in China for example.

:topic - here's the program btw.
http://en.beijing2008.cn/cptvenues/schedule/
 

Attachments

  • olympic program1.jpg
    53 KB · Views: 121
  • olympic program2.jpg
    26.3 KB · Views: 133

Barrister and parents will definitely chip in with ides what to say and our nation being bent on giving n-th chance and rehabilitating everybody will find a way to have him on.

The simplest, would be under presumption of innocent until prove guilty, just set court proceedings in September 2008, both problems solved.


To make it also partially on subject, If they let him go, Chinese swimmers might pull out of Olympics in protest that D’Arcy’s going.
 
doctorj said:
What's the relevance of any of this to this thread?
Click to expand...

Its called grasping at straws!

juw, where is the link the European boycott of Sydney 2000 because of aborigines - you don’t have one because no such thing happened.

Whos is the "we" you refer to earlier? - No answer.

You challenged us to come up with any eyewitness - I came up with three, all of which you ignore.

juw, you are a compulsive story teller, who says things then cant back anything up, then you hide behind the "you are all racists", the catch cry of the desperate and the unintelligent.
 
PS juw keep arguing, your flawed arguments are turning the poll numbers around day by day.
 
Aussie why do you have to sound so bitter all the time? The eye witness links you found on google dont have anything that suggests foul play by China. And I never said there was a boycott of the Sydney games. Do you comprehend that Aboriginal rights was a big agenda worldwide as well as domestic? There were protests about how Aborigine culture was exploited to sell the games when in fact the culture was repressed a long time ago. Unless you have good information to post, just chill out ok?
 
The games should never be politically associated , they are there to applaud the worlds best .

Leave the protests to politicians and participants of the areas affected .

That is a real symbolic protest .

Burning cars and destruction , is violence and a legal government will begat violence back is has the law behind it .

If you want to protest find the free tibet fund and waste your money , because I would dare say , it ain't happening . That goes for most of the land India lost too . But I'd say trade between India and China will expand and grow over the coming years .

Next games in India .........
 
I think China has started to become more open and free in recent years. Actually I think I would trust China further than I would Russia or Iran and a few others.

China is making a concerted effort to be involved in world affairs and I reckon have helped to keep the US in check in the UN Security Council, from going to worse excess as the self proclaimed international policeman.

Let the games go on without incident. An important point in conflict resolution is engage and work with people. Where more reforms need to be made tie an odd little string (condition) to trade or big events like the games. Pay a reward for each little step to improvement.

I'm sure the games along with other sporting events like the V8'S and F1 tour will promote better business, cultural and political circumstances in China.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
The 7 Moats of Quality Companies
Replies
7
Views
7K
divs4ever
Holidays in the Danger Zone
Replies
17
Views
4K
Smurf1976
Beijing - the dirtiest Olympics
Replies
5
Views
3K
MRC & Co
Australian Olympic legend Dawn Fraser to boycott Beijing
2 3 4
Replies
69
Views
15K
2020hindsight
M
The Fabian society flies under the radar
2
Replies
36
Views
22K
Tisme
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...