After my phone call to WC yesterday When i gave them a big blast about listing on the hole in the wall NSX & others things A rich widow is my only hope too //////////////////JH would not like me to much after the last meeting in Brisbane
I still reckon my only chance is a rich widow ???
CableGuy thats what i have been saying all along But you put it into words just right Everything you say is spot on If Jh gets the vote we will all be lead by the unknown & blind faith A questain for all Would any of you good folk buy into this fund if you had your chance again ???????????????????????Precisely my point Seamisty. If people have consulted with experts then tell the actual facts that have come out of those meetings. Don’t just tell me how to vote. I’ll decide that based on the data provided.
JH will take over $20 million over 5 years. $3 million per year based on .45 cent unit but that doubles sometime before 5 years if JH reaches her goal. Liquidator will take $20 million. Octaviar quoted $20 million in their liquidation figures and that’s a lot more complex than the PIF.
The 6 cent per unit distribution is nothing out of the ordinary. JH isn’t pulling this out of her pocket. It comes from the interest on the PIFs assets. If that interest is coming in under JH than it’ll still come in while the fund is wound up. So here are my gestimates:
Liquidation by 31 March 09: 14 cents per unit
Liquidate over 3 to 5 years: 65 cents per unit (plus interest distributions which will reduce as the assets are sold.)
Stay with JH for 1 year: 45 cent units which will be sold for 14 cents on the NSX
Stay with JH for 5 years: $1 units which will be sold for 50 cents on the NSX
Of course the second option isn't available!
I am not lieing they did not ask me how i am going to vote i asjked them how do you think the vote will go And the answer i go whas it coud be a cliff hanger As for getting your money back if any the answer was the NSX When i told her what a worthless wast of time that would be she said Jenny has made up her mind about that Look i dont give stuff if you think i am lieing i am telling the truth If anyones lieing its WC to you People like you only believe what they want to believe ////////////I can handle people coming on here and expressing their view. Whether I agree with it or not, everyone has the right to express their opinion in a public arena such as this. You are allowed to be a misery guts, and believe that the sun may not come up tomorrow and have no ability to be optimistic about anything that may be upcoming in your life.
What I can't handle is people that come on here and talk tripe and basically just lie. This means you great dame. Today I have caught you on a second lie. You said that you spoke to WC today and they told you there is no other means of getting your money other than NSX. I spoke to them today and they are awaiting advice from JH who is still going over options. Whether that means NSX is the only avenue may prove be the case, but there is no way they could have told you that today; when the consultant that spoke to you was not in a position to know the answer. That is fact.
The other lie you told was the other day when you said that a WC consultant told you that the vote would come down to the wire in respect to WC securing 75% of the vote. That is just cr@p! I again spoke to a WC consultant about the vote and she confimed that as at 5pm when I spoke to her, WC has taken nearly 1500 callers and they always ask them at the end of the call if they would vote for WC to continue as RE and not ONE caller said they would vote to liquidate. Not one. How would they then tell you it looked tight?
I can take your non-constructive posts with nothing more than bitching about the NSX and how you want ASX, let's face it that is the sum total of them all, but please don't try and be "informative" with plain out lies OK. You can misspell all you like, as long as the content is either true or just opinion.
WC will try and contact most investors between now and the vote via phone to get a gauge how they will vote and answer as many concerns as they may have. JH is quietly confident, as I believe she would not be wasting her time if she didn't feel she had a good crack at getting 75% of the people that will vote.
I again spoke to a WC consultant about the vote and she confimed that as at 5pm when I spoke to her, WC has taken nearly 1500 callers and they always ask them at the end of the call if they would vote for WC to continue as RE and not ONE caller said they would vote to liquidate. Not one. How would they then tell you it looked tight?
Trust me on this, in three years time this forum and all the personalities on it will just be a distant memory.
I will probably be in a nursing home with Alzheimer’s disease (am half way there already)
Am I being naive, or is this what liquidation means? Let’s say we get not 14% but an optimistic 30% with an “orderly” liquidation. E.g. $30k on $100k investment. What do we then do? Invest the $30k at 8.5% to give a return of $2,500 p.a. on an inflation depleting asset.
With Jenny, a $100k original investment will return 6 cents or $6,000 with the chance of the original investment being recovered over time. Please can somebody tell me if there is any logical reason we should go for any sort of liquidation??
:::Hi Selciper, When I spoke to WC regarding this approx 4 weeks ago, I was told that what happened to the Kooralbyn Resort would not have any impact on the 45cent unit price, so I can only assume this had had already been factored in. Will also re-copy an article from the Gold Coast Bulletin from Aug 2:::New owner coming for Kooralbyn:::August 2nd, 2008Business Sprctator 08/08/08:
The Kooralbyn Hotel Resort in Queensland has accumulated debts of approximately $A60 million and has gone into receivership. The property, which includes a 100-room resort, a golf course and a 36-room golf lodge, owes the troubled Premium Income Fund (PIF) an estimated $A50 million. PIF does not have security over the hotel operating business. Savills Gold Coast is attempting to locate a buyer for the resort in its entirety and says it is holding discussions with several interested parties
Distributed by News Bites. © Lexis-Nexis
Share This Story
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?