Good morning great dame, I have tried to stay reasonably positive on this thread but I'm beginning to wonder how many investors are being deterred from this forum from your constant negative posts.It doesn't matter what anyone posts, you immediately follow it up with a downramp!!! Please start showing some consideration and respect for others it or you will find yourself posting on your own here. Seamisty:bad::bad:WC will decide on hard ship cases HEY And what will they get ?? not much i guess The fund is not returning 6% at all that is a return of capital of the fund bleading it in other words /////////
Look all we have got is just TALK TALK from JH I would love to believe her But i wont to see results not promises nothing wrong with that I will not except listing on the NSX I trade shares And that exchange would be the worst possable outcome for us believe me I will lean more to her if she dumps the NSX /////Good morning great dame, I have tried to stay reasonably positive on this thread but I'm beginning to wonder how many investors are being deterred from this forum from your constant negative posts.It doesn't matter what anyone posts, you immediately follow it up with a downramp!!! Please start showing some consideration and respect for others it or you will find yourself posting on your own here. Seamisty:bad::bad:
Hi Great dame,Riickh if i wgas an invester advicer i might say the things your saying too to your clients that are in a bad way i feel sorry for them But right now i feel more sorry for my self Are you passing all this information to JH ?????
From our local AG Port Macquarie secretary, part of the WC forum feedback is:
As to the strange short time frame (7 mths) of the liquidation, August 08 to March 31st, 09, if WC does not receive the 75% vote, a response from Jenny today, said it had something to do with "the 360 day time cycle coming up from the start of the freezing of our funds". My speculation is that that could be that we can then (possibly) make redemptions on the fund and send it into a tailspin, but that's only my guess.
Breaker1's #1101 objective report gives us reason to remain positive! The recent descent into gloom in many posts is understandable, but pessimism doesn't produce one cent. JH appears to be setting out a realistic process while having the right qualifications to do so.
Imagine if MFS had liquidated the PIF at the time we were receiving those ridiculous newsletters! Be thankful.
If it weren't for Breaker1's initiative we'd be without this informative thread. Let's calm down and be realistic. The world economy, after all, is in tatters. We have a manager trying to help us through this period.
G'day Breaker1, mate i now get whats going on,have a look at all of the posts by great dame (mr magoo) now have a look at the majority of replies they are from rickh, there are a sprinkling of other replies from unit holders who wish to, rightly, voice their concerns via this forum but are responding to these idiots retoric to try and get them to tone down their negativity i think one of them is trying to show everybody how clever he is by replying to mr magoo by telling him how many of his clients he is working so hard for, and also influence others with this same retoric, this pairs agenda is to disrupt this forum,and make it more difficult for those who have an honest interest in moving foreward and meaningful.i know i said i would not respond on this forum again because of the above,but somebody had to say it ,the whole thing to me is like an organised exersize to distrupt fair and honest comment.:nosympath
Thank you "Duped" for the needed, positive common sense.
Recession and Depression are results of attitudes of mind.
Flatback,
I would have thought that my comments were positive and I have tried to create a base for the structure of the PIF going foward. The loan agreement is a good way to help those in desperate need. But obviously you think that I am not providing any benefit to this forum. I disagree but if others feel the same please reply and I will stop offering any comments at all.
May clients want their money back plus.:1zhelp::venus::1zhelp:
I am deeply hurt i hope i can recover Tell me DoraNBoots are you writing to JH too I have found if you keep the drip method up long enough you sometimes get reslts & thats what i entend to do Try & lose is betting then not trying at all///////Hi Great Dame,
We hear you! We acknowledge you! Some even agree with you!
I agree with a lot of what you say but would it be possible for you to hold back from posting a little? Maybe limit yourself to one post per page instead of every second post.
I want the same information you want from WC. I’m thinking if you are writing to WC as much as you are here then you might just be successful. If I were JH, I would pay you out immediately for $1.10 a unit just to silence you.
Flatback,
I would have thought that my comments were positive and I have tried to create a base for the structure of the PIF going foward. The loan agreement is a good way to help those in desperate need. But obviously you think that I am not providing any benefit to this forum. I disagree but if others feel the same please reply and I will stop offering any comments at all.
May clients want their money back plus.:1zhelp::venus::1zhelp:
I am an investor in the PIF with many millions of $ of my own money in there, so I am extremely nervous to say the least. I have spoken to Guy Hutchings dierctly on a couple of occassions in the last 2 months, and whilst he assures me that we will recoup most, if not all our caiptal..I have my doubts. He himself has some of his own money in there.
What I can't work out is why Wellington Capital (WC) is now in the picture. I mean what is the financial advantage to them. I am hoping that they will be a white knight and at least pursue the $50m from the parent co to cover the shortfalls..but what does WC have to gain apart from a client list of investors that would not re-invest as a going concern?? I am more than happy to talk with other investors to get an action group started..I am in Sydney.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?