Of interest to some relating to the latest Print Mail Logistics auditors report. Armstrong Registry Services, Wellington Capital and other J Hutson related companies/entities hold approx 30% of shares on issue in Print Mail Logistics::
Page 78 of annual report http://www.nsxa.com.au/ftp/news/021724351.PDF
Emphasis of matter
Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to Note 1(a), in the financial report, which indicates that the
company and consolidated entity incurred losses of $38,674 and $335,087 respectively during the year
ended 30 June 2011 and, at that date, the company’s and consolidated entity’s current liabilities exceeded
their current assets by $1,670,287 and $1,556,188 respectively. These conditions, along with the other
matters set forth in Note 1(a), indicate the existence of a material uncertainty that may cast significant doubt
about the company and consolidated entity’s ability to continue as a going concerns and therefore, whether
they will be able to realise their assets and discharge their liabilities in the normal course of business.
Has anyone heard from Castlereagh Capital??????? Not a word from our great white hope.
I know they have spent lots of there time and money, but surely we deserve better than this. Just a one line statement will do me, but nothing.
Do you all think I am expecting too much???????????
Michael
I guess we will never know the true voting results while ever WC have ten fingers+ in the pie re Armstrong Registry Services!! Don't forget Wellington Capital could not even bring themselves to divuldge the true results from something as simple as a vote for a PIF investor advisory committee because they polled apparently not in the best interests of the RE. UMMNN, where do PIF investors actually stand with the IAC these days???? Who was the one remaining member suffering from laryngitis whose use by date has now expired??How do we know that the 'applause ' on the GC was not paid for 'buy' another gennearous benefactor???? A benefactor that 'knows nothing, hears nothing, and never in their wildest dreams' (well not that is publically known) would be part of private negotiations between others that may or may not have taken place??? Other meanings for the initiail WC?? Well Chewed, Well Conned, Well Connected, the mind boggles really.Legendary status for failure to deliver on all business fronts and former and present associates now on the red alert radar.Yes Michael, I'm afraid You are expecting to much. Reading that CasCap got only
less than 40 % support from us investors, that JH got more than 300 investors
to each of her meetings and Cascap less than 100 and that JH got even applause
on the Goldcoast, I really think we don't deserve better. All this naivity, someone more nasty would call it stupidity shown by most investors in the PIF is absolut breathtaking!!
I hope it's not a distant memory, for anyone assessing whether to do business with Wellington Capital or Jenny Hutson. I hope the memory of this debacle she has so greatly contributed to remains for the rest of her career and beyond.
Well on the off chance(sic) that WC need to pop in andbe updated again any time soon here's another figure that is grossly outdated on the WC website!! There are no different classes of investors as far as I know. I guess a company as inadequate as WC have proved to be need to cling to outdated valuations. I bet if the current figures were on the up side to when WC took on the PIF we would have before and after amounts!!Good to see that WC has finally corrected the incorrect number of units on their page http://www.wellcap.com.au/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=7&Itemid=8
So perhaps what we post here does get back to WC afterall? I certainly didn't notify anyone of the error except readers of this thread.
I hope it's not a distant memory, for anyone assessing whether to do business with Wellington Capital or Jenny Hutson. I hope the memory of this debacle she has so greatly contributed to remains for the rest of her career and beyond.
This was in the Gold Coast Bulletin on Friday 9th September, 2011.
MFS creditors up for partial payout
Written by: Nick Nichols
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?