Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

Wellington Capital PIF/Octaviar (MFS) PIF

This was in the Gold Coast Bulletin on Friday 9th September, 2011.

MFS creditors up for partial payout
Written by: Nick Nichols

FORMER Gold Coast financial
powerhouse MFS might be in
liquidation but it is sitting on a
$1S0 milllon pile of cash and still
bleeding $500,000 a month in fees
to liquidators.
Yet there could be some good
news for creditors by Christmas.
Wellington capital managing
director Jenny Hutson told investors
in the former MFS-controlled
Premium Income Fund that liquidator
Kate Barnet had taken an
"innovative" approach to distributing
the stricken company's cash to
existing creditors.
She said this could deliver a partial
payout to PIF unitholders
before the end of the year.
MFS - now known as Octaviar -
has registered debts of about
$2.1billion.
PIF accounts for 10 per cent of
the claim, or an estimated $15 million
share of the MFS cash kitty.
That represents about 2Q a unit
for PIF investors which is on top of
the 27C a unit the fund is estimated
to be worth today.
Investors already are almost
three years overdue for the initial
3Q payout promised by Ms Hutson
in 2008, although Wellington
Capital is also yet to draw any management
fees from the fund.
Wellington Capital - which now
controls the fund despite a challenge
by insolvenry specialist Ian
Ferrier earlier this year - has repaid
2f a unit to investors. Ms Hutson
said she was hopeful at least
another lQ would be paid before
Christmas from the MFS dividend. It had been 1000 days since
Ms Hutson last addressed investors
in the fund on the Gold Coast.
"A lot has happened and a lot has
still to happen," she told about 300
unitholders at the Gold Coast Convention
Centre yesterday.
In 2008, Ms Hutson had hopes of
reviving PIF and restoring units to
their full $l value.
Yesterday, on the third leg of a
national tour, she told investors the
crash in asset values since then had
taken that option off the table.
"One dollar is not a number we
will ever see again," she said.
The fund, once worth $770 million,
is now valued at $224.9 million.
Its Gold Coast portfolio,
including assets bought by Raptis
Group, has been responsible for
a significant portion of the fund's
losses.
Ms Hutson said the fund had
$51.2 million in assets under conditional
contract which could
deliver another 5f to unitholders.
Every $8.3 million recovered by
PIF returns lt a unit to investors.
Ms Hutson said a further
$100 million in-assets would go to
market over the next 12 months.
Still on foot were legal claims
totalling $211 million against MFS
and parties associated with the
company, including a compensation
claim spearheaded by the Australian
Securities and Investments
Commission for $147.5 million.
She said the claim could take 18
months to two years to achieve.

PIF PAYMENT PLAN
Total Assets $224.9m
Already Paid $15.0m
MFS Distribution $15.0m
Under Contract $52.5m
Next 12 Months $100m
Litigation Unknown
*Every $8.3 million recovered is worth 1c a unit
 
DEREGISTERED

One decision that appeared to go largely unnoticed in July regarded a former chief financial officer of the collapsed Gold Coast financial concern MFS (aka Octaviar), David Anderson, having his registration as a liquidator cancelled.

Anderson, whose company Business Puzzle Solutions Pty Ltd collected about $1 million in consulting fees assisting the former MFS liquidator Deloitte, had his registration annulled due to his failure to lodge his 2010 annual statement as a registered liquidator. The statement was due in September last year.

''The plain fact of the matter is that, despite having had ample opportunity to lodge his annual statement, he has chosen not to do so and apparently has no present intention of doing so,'' the decision by the Companies Auditors and Liquidators Disciplinary Board said.


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/business/priv...ded-message-20110912-1k5yd.html#ixzz1XmdxDTpD
 
MFS creditor win on way: liquidator
Nick Nichols, business editor | September 14th, 2011

She also defended the liquidation of Octaviar as the most appropriate action to recover funds for creditors.

Based on the cash at hand and the company's creditors claims, the liquidation will return about 6c in the dollar without accounting for a successful legal claim.

This compares with a proposed 22.5c-in-the-dollar payout put forward by white knight director Chris Scott in 2008
Full story:::

http://www.goldcoast.com.au/article/2011/09/14/349271_gold-coast-business.html
 
Strange isn't it the way Hutson is always available for comment when the GCB wants to ask a question or two. Other newspapers reportedly don't get a return call very often. Inevitably her comment to the GCB is, "This is an excellent result for PIF investors."
 
Of interest to some relating to the latest Print Mail Logistics auditors report. Armstrong Registry Services, Wellington Capital and other J Hutson related companies/entities hold approx 30% of shares on issue in Print Mail Logistics::
Page 78 of annual report http://www.nsxa.com.au/ftp/news/021724351.PDF
Emphasis of matter
Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to Note 1(a), in the financial report, which indicates that the
company and consolidated entity incurred losses of $38,674 and $335,087 respectively during the year
ended 30 June 2011 and, at that date, the company’s and consolidated entity’s current liabilities exceeded
their current assets by $1,670,287 and $1,556,188 respectively. These conditions, along with the other
matters set forth in Note 1(a), indicate the existence of a material uncertainty that may cast significant doubt
about the company and consolidated entity’s ability to continue as a going concerns and therefore, whether
they will be able to realise their assets and discharge their liabilities in the normal course of business.
 
Of interest to some relating to the latest Print Mail Logistics auditors report. Armstrong Registry Services, Wellington Capital and other J Hutson related companies/entities hold approx 30% of shares on issue in Print Mail Logistics::
Page 78 of annual report http://www.nsxa.com.au/ftp/news/021724351.PDF
Emphasis of matter
Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to Note 1(a), in the financial report, which indicates that the
company and consolidated entity incurred losses of $38,674 and $335,087 respectively during the year
ended 30 June 2011 and, at that date, the company’s and consolidated entity’s current liabilities exceeded
their current assets by $1,670,287 and $1,556,188 respectively. These conditions, along with the other
matters set forth in Note 1(a), indicate the existence of a material uncertainty that may cast significant doubt
about the company and consolidated entity’s ability to continue as a going concerns and therefore, whether
they will be able to realise their assets and discharge their liabilities in the normal course of business.


Could some one point me in the direction of a successful venture controlled or managed by Wellington Group of companies, please.
 
Charles36,

The problem is that she looses other peoples money (OPM). If it was her money, I am sure Jenny and her wonderful team still wouldn't have the ability to make a profit.

M
 
OPI Pacific and Boston Finance mentioned in a NZ article, here:

http://http://tvnz.co.nz/business-news/fma-still-investigating-16-finance-companies-4404035

"FMA still investigating 16 finance companies"
Published: 12:53PM Thursday September 15, 2011 Source: BusinessDesk


in Part states:
"Companies still in the FMA's sights are Allied Nationwide Finance, Boston Finance, Equitable Mortgages, Hanover Capital, Hanover Finance, Kiwi Finance, LDC Finance, Mutual Finance, OPI Pacific, Propertyfinance Securities, South Canterbury Finance, St Laurence, Strategic Finance, Structured Finance, Viaduct Capital and Vision Securities." continues

I am having problems with the link.

http://tvnz.co.nz/business-news/fma-still-investigating-16-finance-companies-4404035

so a google news search for OPI pacific might be required
 
Has anyone heard from Castlereagh Capital??????? Not a word from our great white hope.

I know they have spent lots of there time and money, but surely we deserve better than this. Just a one line statement will do me, but nothing.

Do you all think I am expecting too much???????????

Michael
 
Has anyone heard from Castlereagh Capital??????? Not a word from our great white hope.

I know they have spent lots of there time and money, but surely we deserve better than this. Just a one line statement will do me, but nothing.

Do you all think I am expecting too much???????????

Michael

Yes Michael, I'm afraid You are expecting to much. Reading that CasCap got only
less than 40 % support from us investors, that JH got more than 300 investors
to each of her meetings and Cascap less than 100 and that JH got even applause
on the Goldcoast, I really think we don't deserve better. All this naivity, someone more nasty would call it stupidity shown by most investors in the PIF is absolut breathtaking!!
 
Yes Michael, I'm afraid You are expecting to much. Reading that CasCap got only
less than 40 % support from us investors, that JH got more than 300 investors
to each of her meetings and Cascap less than 100 and that JH got even applause
on the Goldcoast, I really think we don't deserve better. All this naivity, someone more nasty would call it stupidity shown by most investors in the PIF is absolut breathtaking!!
I guess we will never know the true voting results while ever WC have ten fingers+ in the pie re Armstrong Registry Services!! Don't forget Wellington Capital could not even bring themselves to divuldge the true results from something as simple as a vote for a PIF investor advisory committee because they polled apparently not in the best interests of the RE. UMMNN, where do PIF investors actually stand with the IAC these days???? Who was the one remaining member suffering from laryngitis whose use by date has now expired??How do we know that the 'applause ' on the GC was not paid for 'buy' another gennearous benefactor???? A benefactor that 'knows nothing, hears nothing, and never in their wildest dreams' (well not that is publically known) would be part of private negotiations between others that may or may not have taken place??? Other meanings for the initiail WC?? Well Chewed, Well Conned, Well Connected, the mind boggles really.Legendary status for failure to deliver on all business fronts and former and present associates now on the red alert radar.
 
I hope it's not a distant memory, for anyone assessing whether to do business with Wellington Capital or Jenny Hutson. I hope the memory of this debacle she has so greatly contributed to remains for the rest of her career and beyond.

I'd like to correct the year in the post of mine you quoted AusInCa. I.e. to

So what did happen to the business plan "with measured new investments aimed at rebalancing the asset class allocations of the Fund in time." Published in the Investor Update of 19 January 2011.

http://nsxa.com.au/ftp/news/021723633.PDF




Here's Hutson talking about the backflip (according to the Gold Coast Bulletin):

"In 2008, Ms Hutson had hopes of reviving PIF and restoring units to their full $1 value.
Yesterday, on the third leg of a national tour, she told investors the crash in asset values since then had taken that option off the table.
"One dollar is not a number we will ever see again," she said"
[emphasis added]

Ahhh that's right. Blame the GFC.

Are there any unit holders out there who were naiive enough to believe we would ever see $1 again?

Read this again: "she told investors the crash in asset values since then had taken that option off the table."

What "asset values"?

  • The year-on-year paper valuations presented to us by WC? Well that's a mechanism that WC can use to manage down our expectations of "asset values". E.g. so that the valuations aren't so high they appear unbelievable. So unbelievable that WC's can't defend its integrity. Remember that the higher the paper valuations, the more Hutson and her company get paid.
  • Sale prices substantially below WC's paper valuations? Doesn't that simply show that Hutson's company doesn't know their market? That WC's paper "asset values" were fanciful? If so then why keep a responsible enetity that doesn't know its business very well? Remember that the higher the paper valuations, the more Huston and her company get paid.
Now anyone, hopefully a WC supporter, can you show me where Hutson has stated that the "crash in asset values" is or has ever been a surprise to her (or unexpected or was ever unlikely)?

I see nowhere, any statement by Hutson that the asset prices crash is a surprise to her. Whereas I see plenty of money (wo)men saying a big drop in value of commercial and even residential property was a certainty.
 
From Gold Coast Bulletin:

"In 2008, Ms Hutson had hopes of reviving PIF and restoring units to their full $1 value.
Yesterday, on the third leg of a national tour, she told investors the crash in asset values since then had taken that option off the table.
"One dollar is not a number we will ever see again," she said"
[emphasis added]



I repeat: Are there any unit holders out there who were naiive enough to believe we would ever see $1 again?

See my posts #2155 and #2162.

As Darrly Kerrigan would say: Yer Dreamin'.

Some more generous might yours: 'wishful thinking'. Judges like to use the word 'fanciful'. I say you were 'wrong'. (Ahhh word bending - fun game isn't it?) What word would Hutson use?

Perhaps she'll pull out the same defence of her actions as when Justice Gordon overturned WC's amendment of the PIF constitution. I.e. Huston just says 'she disagees with your opinion'. That's lovely but how does that help investors? I say Gordon's decision means Hutson's WC was in the worng.

Hutson's WC seems to be gettin a lot of things 'More Wrong Than Correct' doesn't it?
 
Good to see that WC has finally corrected the incorrect number of units on their page http://www.wellcap.com.au/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=7&Itemid=8

So perhaps what we post here does get back to WC afterall? I certainly didn't notify anyone of the error except readers of this thread.
Well on the off chance(sic) that WC need to pop in andbe updated again any time soon here's another figure that is grossly outdated on the WC website!! There are no different classes of investors as far as I know. I guess a company as inadequate as WC have proved to be need to cling to outdated valuations. I bet if the current figures were on the up side to when WC took on the PIF we would have before and after amounts!!

WPIF: Net Asset Backing

35.1 cents as at 30 June 2010
as opposed to the PIF:
27 cents as at 30 June 2011

34 cents per unit as at 31 December 2010

35.1 cents per unit as at 30 June 2010
 
I hope it's not a distant memory, for anyone assessing whether to do business with Wellington Capital or Jenny Hutson. I hope the memory of this debacle she has so greatly contributed to remains for the rest of her career and beyond.

It will be easy for Hutson to put PIF behind her because, after all, she's making money. So what's she really complaining about? Her work load? It's not the easy money Hutson expected?

Whereas us PIF investors whose savings have been smashed and gutted - we're in a completely different boat. Any one of us who doesn't have vivid memories of this experience will just get screwed again and again and again.

To make a mistake is OK. Not learning from your mistake is not OK.

Just another example of Hutson being out of touch. Out of touch with PIF investors. Or is she? Is Hutson acutely aware that us investors (as a whole) are a dumb fat cow to be milked?
 
This was in the Gold Coast Bulletin on Friday 9th September, 2011.

MFS creditors up for partial payout
Written by: Nick Nichols

Absolutely stunning MAE. Not one mention of the dilution of the unit value. Nick Nichols omission is absolutely stunning. Assuming he assembled the information himself. Makes WC's performance look good. Not really surprising then if Hutson gets cheered by Gold Coast unitholders that get their info only from Nichols.

I wonder what the journalists over at the Australian know what their sister publication is doing for WC.
 
Top