- Joined
- 14 August 2008
- Posts
- 33
- Reactions
- 0
Re: Octaviar MFS Premium Income Fund PIF
Agree with what you say about the options.
All you have to do now is communicate that to all the unitholders
Again, what is the definition of "positiveness"? To some people it means closing your eyes and ears and doing what you are told with a smile on your face and your heart full of hope. To others it means looking for the truth, uncovering hidden lies and exposing false statements.
The fact is Unitholders OWN the Fund. We have the right to hold our own meetings and vote on our own resolutions as to what happens with the Fund. Most of us oppose listing on the NSX - why should we be made to feel that we have to vote for it ?
Other alternatives have been put forward, some people are just to scared to acknowledge them, they feel safer doing what they're told.
If the RE can make the Fund perform as claimed, why do we need to list on the NSX. Why can't we make them report to us at regular intervals so that we can vote on the best action to take in regards to distributions and redemptions according to the Funds performance.
- We can vote to implement a buy back offer according to what audited accounts allow.
- We can vote to extend the freeze on redemptions for a further 180 days.
- We can vote to look at another buy back offer at the end of the current redemption freeze.
- We can vote to look at another buy back offer at the end of the extended 180 day redemption freeze.
- We can vote that distributions be made whenever profits are realised.
- We can vote to have an independant administrator appointed if we feel that the RE is not living up to its promises.
We don't have to do as we are told, particularly if we feel that is not in our best interests, and I believe that most see listing on the NSX as not being in our best interests.
Agree with what you say about the options.
All you have to do now is communicate that to all the unitholders