- Joined
- 13 August 2006
- Posts
- 897
- Reactions
- 1,135
I just checked today and the WDS vs BPT...so I half my share of WDS to limit what I see as potential damages especially the "energy transition crap etc"..Sovereign risk always seems to cause problems for companies investing in Africa.
Woodside have been burnt investing in Africa in the past and I wasn't pleased to see them heading back there.
Here's hoping that there isn't an other round of write downs out of this.
@debtfree
write downs yes , i can see them coming but on the new BHP assets/plant , Africa well only time will tell there ( always a chance some big international major will come in with a compelling offer )Here's hoping that there isn't an other round of write downs out of this.
If these Guys go WOKE they will go Broke.
Concentrating on their core business rather than virtue posturing is the key to their survival. Let alone their profitability.
By all means pursue GREEN energy but it has to be profitable in time.
but 'those activist stances' are often acquired by union super funds ( and sometimes they are a big chunk of the share register )The problem they have is shareholder proxy advisors and union dominated super funds who are all Leftard climate warriors. What the hell they're doing on an oil companies share register can only be because of investment rules of the funds or woke agendas.
View attachment 174412
Glass Lewis last week recommended shareholders vote against Richard Goyder’s re-election at Woodside’s AGM on April 24 because of what it called a “dismissive” attitude to concerns about emissions and climate. Glass Lewis also urged shareholders to reject Woodside’s decarbonisation plan.
The proxy adviser referred to a report by the Australian Centre for Corporate Responsibility that Woodside under Mr Goyder had been “persistently unresponsive” to shareholder concerns about climate risk management and was pursuing a growth strategy not in shareholders’ interests.
Woodside said the research house’s response “appears to have been informed” by two member statements submitted to this year’s AGM.
“While Glass Lewis’ report says it does not share the concerns raised in these statements, they appear to be the main source for its assessment and commentary. We would like to point out that these two member statements were prepared by two civil society organisations, which both take an activist stance on climate issues and the fossil fuels sector,” Woodside said in a statement on Tuesday.
“The shareholders who submitted those members’ statements hold up to 0.005 per cent of Woodside’s shares on issue. We do not believe their views are representative of the majority of Woodside’s shareholders, whether institutional or retail.”
Yet they get 90% of the coverage.“The shareholders who submitted those members’ statements hold up to 0.005 per cent of Woodside’s shares on issue. We do not believe their views are representative of the majority of Woodside’s shareholders, whether institutional or retail.”
The market is not going to like this
Woodside has faced a tough quarter, and it’s safe to say that the market is poised for a reaction at the open. Today's release of the “First Quarter Report” paints a worrisome picture for Woodside. The company’s performance in Q1 2024 has seen a significant downturn compared to both Q4 2023 and Q1 2023. This downward slide in Woodside’s performance mirrors its dwindling share price. While this is purely speculative on my part, I fear the market will respond to these developments, and it’s reasonable to anticipate that the reaction may not be favourable.
The takeaway from the report
WDS revenue decreased by 12% compared to Q4 2023 and by 31% compared to Q1 2023. (ouch). Both the production and the sale of oil have decreased in Q1 2024 compared to Q4 2023 and Q1 2023. The average price at which the company sold its oil also decreased in Q1 2024 compared to Q4 2023 and Q1 2023 adds another layer to Woodside's woes.
Skate.
King noted that Australia's gas industry, "creates highly paid and skilled jobs. It pays for roads, hospitals, schools and our security."We will need affordable gas to support energy reliability for households and businesses as we move to a more renewable grid. We need gas to support Australian manufacturing and Australian industry, and tens of thousands of Australian jobs in the manufacturing sector.
is this enough to turn it around ?
Realism intrudes: Aust government's long-term views on the need for Australian-produced gas.
This morning, Federal Resources Minister Madeleine King said (quoted by The Australian Financial Review):
King noted that Australia's gas industry, "creates highly paid and skilled jobs. It pays for roads, hospitals, schools and our security."
King said Australia's producers supply some 20% of the world's gas. This delivered $72 billion of export income for Australia's economy in 2023-24.
And King highlighted how the government's gas plan can work to help the nation and its trading partners reach their emissions reduction goals.
"We need gas to help us achieve our commitment to net zero. Our trading partners depend on our gas to meet their commitments to net zero...."
Yes, government support for Scarborough and Narrabri might provide the kick these two needed.This unexpected political turnaround puts both WDS and STO back into my trading universe. Coincidentally oil is rallying off its recent low.
@FerretSovereign risk always seems to cause problems for companies investing in Africa.
Woodside have been burnt investing in Africa in the past and I wasn't pleased to see them heading back there.
Here's hoping that there isn't an other round of write downs out of this.
@debtfreerr
i am aware that they have a (ad) venture there@Ferret
Just curious how much are you aware of WDS Africa (Senegal) venture ?
I do have a family friend there.
Cheers
Africa gives a pessimistic political picture. True.i am aware that they have a (ad) venture there
can't get real picture of the geo-politics there , so it keeps me on the pessimist side of the spectrum ( on the whole company )
i am not totally averse to African exposure ( now, but once was ) but there are changes happening there which keep me cautious
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?