Sean K
Moderator
- Joined
- 21 April 2006
- Posts
- 22,279
- Reactions
- 11,531
Dhukka, I defer to your undertanding of 'new money' but I have the impression, from a 'lay perspective', that there are institutions around the place with vaults full of cash, who are pumping money into the system. It is not 'new' money, but just other people's savings. So, it's only reducing the total savings that have been accumulated.Every week we hear the same crap from the media. This is just poor journalistic reporting. There were NO new injections of money pumped into the system, what the $47 billion injected by the Fed represents are rollovers of repos of different durations. Repeat there is no new liquidity being added to the system. John Hussman of Hussman Funds explains it best. Below relates last week's so-called massive injection of liquidity.
Dhukka, I defer to your undertanding of 'new money' but I have the impression, from a 'lay perspective', that there are institutions around the place with vaults full of cash, who are pumping money into the system. It is not 'new' money, but just other people's savings. So, it's only reducing the total savings that have been accumulated.
The developed world has a LOT of money in the bank to be distributed...
Maybe I'm way off track...
This is the little bit in the global picture I'm struggling with, because I know (perceive) that the generation of the years 50 - 80's have SAVED. It's not 'new' money. They OWN their houses and now have generous pensions coming in. Maybe this is Australian biased, but this equity position has massive implications for the rest of us left behind who will inherit it. Australian house prices are still going up.Kennas,
You are right that banks (other than the Fed) have the ability to create new money. However it is not in the form of cash, they create more debt.
This is the little bit in the global picture I'm struggling with, because I know (perceive) that the generation of the years 50 - 80's have SAVED. It's not 'new' money. They OWN their houses and now have generous pensions coming in. Maybe this is Australian biased, but this equity position has massive implications for the rest of us left behind who will inherit it. Australian house prices are still going up.
Are we being too US centric with the economic position of Aus?
Having said the above, I am a Bear about the human being, which you might have picked up through my general posting....
So, I wait for our implosion, but not right now.
This is the little bit in the global picture I'm struggling with, because I know (perceive) that the generation of the years 50 - 80's have SAVED. It's not 'new' money. They OWN their houses and now have generous pensions coming in. Maybe this is Australian biased, but this equity position has massive implications for the rest of us left behind who will inherit it. Australian house prices are still going up.
Are we being too US centric with the economic position of Aus?
Having said the above, I am a Bear about the human being, which you might have picked up through my general posting....
So, I wait for our implosion, but not right now.
dhukka, I don't think that you are not right in thinking that we have not being too infected by the US. We definately have been, I just question the impact.I definitely have to reign in my own thinking in from being too US centric. ..... However I still think we have been infected by the US mentality of not thinking twice about running up large sums of debt..
........ and .......... they also go to the market and borrow it in the way of bonds , ergo , Citi group , taking up their latest spread at historical levels in relation to yield . The cost of borrowing has goneup , but now the same borrowers will have to pay a higher yield ........ except / probably for Australian banks, who will more than likely , just pass on the costs to established borrowers .
Money has just got expensive , like everything else , afterall .... it is an asset .
Isn't it ..... ?
I always thought cash is King , and we know royalty is expensive .
dhukka, I don't think that you are not right in thinking that we have not being too infected by the US. We definately have been, I just question the impact.
Capitalism has not proven to fail yet. It will go through corrections, as should occur, but modern capitatist societies have yet to be proven failures in the long term....
Shares of Citigroup Inc, the No. 1 US bank, dropped more than 4 percent, while those of Bank of America Corp, the No. 2 US bank, declined more than 3 percent.
"There's just too much fear in the financials," said John O'Brien, senior vice president at MKM Partners LLC in Cleveland, Ohio.
"The fear is back again that the write-downs are kind of a mystery and no one really knows what the bottom is or what the outcome is going to be."
November 16. Nothing has been confirmed but vague rumors of massive withdrawals from a fund run by Carlyle looks to be behind the push lower in the Nikkei into the morning close and the drops in USD/JPY, EUR/JPY and other JPY crosses. The talk is that the fund needs some $1 bln to stay afloat
Wells Fargo (nyse: WFC - news - people ) isn't expecting the housing market to make a comeback anytime soon.
"We have not seen a nationwide decline in housing like this since the Great Depression," said Wells Fargo Chief Executive John Stumpf.
"I don't think we're in the ninth inning of unwinding this," Stumpf said, according to the Associated Press. "If we are, it's going to be an extra-inning game." In what has become a familiar refrain, Stumpf blamed the housing woes on weak demand, a decline in home prices, rising defaults and poor loan-lending practices.
Shares of America’s second-largest mortgage lender fell $1.28, or 3.8%, to $31.97 in Thursday trading.
........ and .......... they also go to the market and borrow it in the way of bonds , ergo , Citi group , taking up their latest spread at historical levels in relation to yield . The cost of borrowing has goneup , but now the same borrowers will have to pay a higher yield ........ except / probably for Australian banks, who will more than likely , just pass on the costs to established borrowers .
Money has just got expensive , like everything else , afterall .... it is an asset .
Isn't it ..... ?
I always thought cash is King , and we know royalty is expensive .
Citigroup, Merrill Push Financial Borrowing Costs to Records
For the first time, the world's biggest financial institutions are paying more to borrow in the corporate bond market than the average company.
Bonds of banks, brokerages and insurance companies yield 1.49 percentage points more than U.S. Treasuries, matching a record high set in October 2002, according to indexes compiled by New York-based Merrill Lynch & Co. The average industrial company bond trades at a yield premium of 1.34 percentage points.
Investors are demanding extra compensation for the risk of owning Citigroup Inc., Merrill Lynch and Barclays Plc on concern that the $50 billion in losses already reported from subprime mortgages will increase. The total damage may reach $400 billion worldwide, Deutsche Bank AG analysts said this week in a report, and Wells Fargo & Co. Chief Executive Officer John Stumpf said the housing market is the worst since the Great Depression....
Citigroup paid 1.90 percentage points more than Treasuries of similar maturity to sell $4 billion of 10-year notes on Nov. 14, its biggest premium, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Citigroup is rated Aa2 by Moody's Investors Service, the third-highest level, and AA by Standard & Poor's.
The same day NStar, the Boston-based electricity provider with ratings two levels below Citigroup, paid a premium of 1.40 percentage points in the sale of $250 million of notes due in 2017.
Wachovia versus Abbott
Merrill's 6.4 percent notes due in 2017 pay a spread of 2.24 percentage points, almost double the premium of 1.21 percentage points a month earlier, according to Bloomberg data and Trace, Finra's bond-pricing service.
Wachovia Corp. sold $1 billion of 10-year subordinated bank notes yesterday at a spread of 1.95 percentage points, the second-highest yield premium the Charlotte, North Carolina-based bank has paid on similar debt. Wachovia is rated Aa3 by Moody's and AA- by S&P.
Abbott Laboratories, the third-biggest drugmaker, on Nov. 6 paid 1.27 percentage points more than Treasuries on its $1.5 billion sale of 10-year notes. The Abbott Park, Illinois-based company is rated A1 by Moody's and AA by S&P.
By pressing my trembling ear firmly to the ground I have picked up rumblings that sound like Citigroup are looking at writing off another 11Bn odd in their 4th Qtr... of course they are only rumblings at the moment...
Cheers
..........Kauri
Hopefully this will not happen to an Aussie Bank. If it does, my view is, let it go under.
To bl**dy right ! That's called a free and fair market .
Banks never rescue defaulters , so why should we help banks that need to default ?
If they can't meet their repayments , fold them . If the boards have stuffed up , fine them . If they have not reported correctly to the market .........
LOCK THEM UP !
I agree, but Individuals should have deposits guaranteed and first right of withdrawl imho.
Looks like return to status quo.Nothing on this since 2007.
Have the US banks been good citizens in the meantime?
I think not.
It seems that after a run on both the large and the small banks in late 2022
, faith in the smaller banks has been largely restored.
The big banks on the other hand ....
View attachment 171583
Mick
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?