Value Collector
Have courage, and be kind.
- Joined
- 13 January 2014
- Posts
- 12,238
- Reactions
- 8,485
Yes, As I said there is no nukes pointed at Russia is Romania or Poland, the USA abandoned equipping tomahawks with Nukes 10years ago.Aegis Ashore systems in Romania and Poland are supposed to be "defensive" missile sites loaded with missiles that can intercept ICBMs. They use the Mark 41 Vertical Launching System (Mk 41 VLS) that are used on nuclear subs and destroyers
Aegis Ashore | Missile Threat
Aegis Ashore is the land-based variant of the Navy’s Aegis Weapons System and the centerpiece of Phases II and III of the European Phased Adaptive Approach (EPAA). The system incorporates land-based versions of the various components used on Aegis ships, including the deckhouse, AN/SPY-1 radar...missilethreat.csis.org
However, they are also fully capable of launching Tomahawk missiles which can be loaded with nuclear warheads.
If you had been following the Russian troop buildup in Feb before the invasion you would have come across this article
AFAIK after the Cuban missile crisis in the 1960s, USA had decommisioned all nuclear missles in Turkey. Currently there are no nuclear missiles directly pointed at Russia from Europe.
Hence this is a sticking point for Russia as its the closest nuclear response NATO has, they can just swap some tomahawks with armed warheads into the Aegis launch system and away they go into Russian Cities. Of course NATO can still fly bombers, use their ship/submarine based tomahawks to nuke Russia, but those are not as quick or easy as pressing a button at those launch sites.
At the same time Russia does not have any direct nuclear response capability as they have already withdrawn from Cuba, even had to send their nuke capable bombers back to Russia.
very interesting, the same author has a video on efficiency of the himars vs russian missiles and artillery.The video shows some big weaknesses in Russian tank design.
This might be the Himar video you guys are talking about.very interesting, the same author has a video on efficiency of the himars vs russian missiles and artillery.
It seems its a repeating theme, Russians have really fallen behind in the last 20-30 years and their weapons are outdated and not accurate. The second theme seems to be the thinking, russian soldiers and personell are disposable therefore not much is invested on training which also hinders efficiency.
Of course American weapons were in Ukraine they have been fighting Russian separatists for 8 years. Remember how Putin's pal withheld US military aid to Ukraine for 55days until he received a favour? He got impeached for doing that.Strangely quickly out of top news..'Close to the limit': The US is running out of essential weapons to send to Ukraine
Washington is "learning lessons" from the conflict about ammunition needs in a great power war, which are "far greater" than expected, a US military official says.www.abc.net.au
A few gems in it.basically it is an all out war on Russia via Ukrainian deaths
Also the fact that the US weapons were already there before the "invasion"...
Damned does not fit the narrative..out
But this is full admission in a woke organ.Of course American weapons were in Ukraine they have been fighting Russian separatists for 8 years. Remember how Putin's pal withheld US military aid to Ukraine for 55days until he received a favour? He got impeached for doing that.
the reservists are to man the backline positions supplying the frontline which has been done by many of the initial 200k frontline soldiers. so now instead of a small force engaging in the frontlines, the actual trained forces in the backlines can now move forward to engage in the frontlines as their support roles are taken over by the reservists.It's bizarre. Recruiting those who may have had some service, say, 10 years ago, given a few weeks basic training (if that) going in against combat hardened troops who are able to be rotated out of the field to give them R&R? Doesn't make any sense whatsoever to me.
The USA has had military bases in Europe for decades, of course they have weapons there, not to mention that they have permanent daily military logistics flights connecting the USA with Germany, so can transport military equipment to Europe at the drop of a hat.Strangely quickly out of top news..'Close to the limit': The US is running out of essential weapons to send to Ukraine
Washington is "learning lessons" from the conflict about ammunition needs in a great power war, which are "far greater" than expected, a US military official says.www.abc.net.au
A few gems in it.basically it is an all out war on Russia via Ukrainian deaths
Also the fact that the US weapons were already there before the "invasion"...
Damned does not fit the narrative..out
Having the crew literally sitting on the ammunition inside the body of the tank.The video shows some big weaknesses in Russian tank design.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?