This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

U.S. Presidential Election 2020

Who will win the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election?

  • Donald Trump

    Votes: 12 44.4%

  • Joe Biden

    Votes: 15 55.6%

  • Kanye West

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Total voters
    27
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jump to new
01011001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01100110 01101100 01101001 01110000 00100000 01100001 01101110 01100100 00100000 01100011 01101000 01100001 01101110 01100111 01100101 00101100 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01101101 01100001 01101011 01100101 00100000 01110011 01110100 01100001 01110100 01100101 01101101 01100101 01101110 01110100 01110011 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100001 01110100 00100000 01101111 01100110 01110100 01100101 01101110 00100000 01100100 01101111 00100000 01101110 01101111 01110100 00100000 01101101 01100001 01101011 01100101 00100000 01100001 01101110 01111001 00100000 01110011 01100101 01101110 01110011 01100101 00101110 00100000 01011001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01110011 01110101 01110000 01110000 01101111 01110010 01110100 00100000 01000011 01101000 01110101 01101101 01110000 00100000 01100010 01110101 01110100 00100000 01100100 01101111 01101110 00100111 01110100 00101100 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01110011 01101000 01101111 01110111 00100000 01100010 01101001 01100001 01110011 01100101 01100100 00100000 01100001 01110011 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01100010 01100101 01101100 01101001 01100101 01110110 01100101 00100000 01000100 01100101 01101101 01110011 00100000 01100001 01110010 01100101 00100000 01100011 01110010 01101111 01101111 01101011 01100101 01100100 00101110 00001010 01000010 01110101 01110100 00100000 01000011 01101000 01110101 01101101 01110000 00100000 01101101 01100001 01101110 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100011 01101111 01101110 01110011 01101001 01110011 01110100 01100101 01101110 01110100 00100000 01101100 01101001 01100001 01110010 00100000 01101111 01110101 01110100 00100000 01100110 01101111 01110010 00100000 01101111 01101110 01101100 01111001 00100000 01101000 01101001 01101101 01110011 01100101 01101100 01100110 00101110
 
Anyone got the full version of that conference ?

Because there's more to it

Such as...

“Speaking of our vote being held and processed, tabulated overseas,”

“there is reports that there was a piece of hardware, possibly a server picked up in Germany. Is that true, and is it related to this?”

“That is true,” Powell replied. “It is somehow related to this, but I do not know whether good guys got it or bad guys got it.”


Sidney Powell - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org
 
Last edited:
You are looking at the whole and not at the targeted swing states. To swing the election you needed a few key states or counties within those states. Efforts don't need to be country wide.

And that's where its being carefully looked at.

I'm saying two things:
Trump lost, nothing will save him. He will be turfed. Thats the beauty of the constitution.

Democrats ran a dodgy campaign. Ballot harvesting should be illegal. Along with all the other crap to abuse the vote.

To add
Those discrepancies should absolutely be checked, if only to clear everyone involved.

satanoperca said:
Please provide some references to your statements.
Click to expand...
The court action I posted above was one. Along with the twitter link I posted before had multiple "references".

As I have said before: Trump inadvertently, (through zero intention and most likely incompetence), will create a situation that ends with cleaning up parts of a corrupt voting system.
 
Its hard finding many people that have taken the numbers. Here is a video of a guy that "said" he went through 2 million calls on suspicious votes (hired a call centre) and ran the numbers.
Released tomorrow. Will be interesting to see.

 
moXJO said:
Its hard finding many people that have taken the numbers. Here is a video of a guy that "said" he went through 2 million calls on suspicious votes (hired a call centre) and ran the numbers.
Released tomorrow. Will be interesting to see.

Click to expand...

Old Matt looks like he can be trusted.


Matt Braynard
@MattBraynard
Executive Director of Look Ahead America. Former Data Chief and Strategist for Trump for President. matt@braynard.com.
 
satanoperca said:
Old Matt looks like he can be trusted.


Matt Braynard
@MattBraynard
Executive Director of Look Ahead America. Former Data Chief and Strategist for Trump for President. matt@braynard.com.
Click to expand...
Numbers matter. Are you arguing the methodology of the way data was collected was incorrect?
He is looking for fraud that will be used in court. It will get torn to shreds if its fake.


If its tainted its easily spotted and verified.
What isn't easily verifiable is that once a mail in envelope is opened and thrown, it is next to impossible to prove voter fraud. The case where the official witnesses (who video every vote open and counted) were told to move back, were blocked from entering, told to leave early is a big deal for that reason.

The envelopes get tossed and that's the part that shows the vote is legit. Mail ins are a magnet for fraud.
So now you need time to find enough people who will come forward and say that someone else took their vote ( 15000 in one state turned up to be told they had already voted via mail ins) or crunch the numbers in an audit. Even then good luck with it.

Even if their was voter fraud on a huge scale its difficult to prove. We already had the numbers not match up in a few states. But realistically what's going to be done.

Im sure it happened. I am positive it won't help Trump.
 
SirRumpole said:
Interesting that you have to pay for a recount.

Does that happen in Australia ?
Click to expand...
Only certain states. US

If its close its automatic in most US states. Its also run by the states in the US. Which is why the rules are not as uniform.

Australia has an independent body.
 
Last edited:
@satanoperca

Code: 
01010100 01101000 01100001 01110100 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01101110 01101111 01110100 00100000 01110100 01110010 01110101 01100101 00101110 00100000 01001001 00100000 01101000 01100001 01110110 01100101 00100000 01100010 01100101 01100101 01101110 00100000 01110101 01110100 01110100 01100101 01110010 01101100 01111001 00100000 01100011 01101111 01101110 01110011 01101001 01110011 01110100 01100101 01101110 01110100 00101100 00100000 01101010 01110101 01110011 01110100 00100000 01100001 01110111 01100001 01110010 01100101 00100000 01101111 01100110 00100000 01100001 01101110 01111001 00100000 01110000 01101111 01110100 01100101 01101110 01110100 01101001 01100001 01101100 00100000 01101111 01110101 01110100 01100011 01101111 01101101 01100101 00101110

^^saving a bit of space so we don't p155 everyone else off
 

I wouldn't say "utterly consistent" wayne .
 
So riddle me this:
If the Dem could stack the votes, why did they only stack for presidency?
If they could commit fraud, then why not go for lower and senate seats as well?
I think if you applied the pub rule, Chump is full of s....t and still cannot provide any evidence except hot air.
 
Look, I don't know, you don't know, and probably 99.99% of people out there don't know what the hell is going on.

We might get some clues via some of the statements such as I have posted above, but that in no way adds any sort of certainty to anything.

One thing I am absolutely certain of is that whatever is wrong with their electoral system, it really must be fixed to ensure the integrity of all future elections.
 

Assuming that there is something wrong with it, which is far from proven.

Whatever its faults, it has elected Republicans and Democrat Presidents in almost equal measure (14 Democrat, 19 Republican) for two hundred years.

For the Repubs to now claim fraud is laughable.
 
It is clear there is no confidence in the system, compare the relative certitude that we have here in Australia and in other Western democracies.

There may be nothing in this or maybe not enough in this to swing the result, I don't know. but the fact that there are serious questions is not good enough in a Western democracy such as the United States.

I realise supporters of the democrats really want this result, but the fact remains that if elections are able to be rorted than they are able to be rorted by either side.

That is not good.

In fact, that is very bad... very very bad.

The fact that there can be legitimate questions about a electoral fraud is also very bad and it will on this occasion, result in violence. I'm certain of that.

That is very very very bad.

Here's the thing, if you are supporters of democracy, then the result here is unimportant in the long-term, but the integrity of the result is extremely important, in the long-term.

While I am on record as hoping for a Trump victory and I don't resile from that, I am more interested in a fair result.
 
Recounts don't mean a lot as per my post above. If he won because of mail ins then that is where the problem lies. The ballot envelopes with all the details get chucked. If official witnesses were standing over the counters then there shouldn't be a problem. But that wasn't always the case.

That paper is biased sht as well.
 
Australia isn't immune from controversial election results. Even today I hear folks at work claiming the postal vote for SSM was either rigged / wrong and wouldn't have passed if it was a plebiscite etc.

Rudy Giuliani will accept the result eventually - but not before you buy him two beers

 
Mail ins of this magnitude were never a problem before. This election is a first of its kind that's the problem. Absentee votes have been around yes, not the mass voter mail ins we saw this election.



I'm not supporting the fraud angle. But many here don't understand what many are finding a problem with.
Its a few key states. Not the safe red or blue states. Below is what is being accused of happening.

So, mail-in ballots come with a ballot and generally two envelopes. The outer envelope has all the details but gets thrown away after opening. The inner envelope is to protect privacy and integrity of vote. Ballot has who you vote for and zero details of who voted.

If official watchers are not there to document then you can end up with a bunch of ballots added to the tally. Or Donald duck can vote 50 times so long as its for the right party.

The other problem is the states dem or Republican employ the officials. You can get fanatics either side. If the official witnesses are being blocked from doing their duty its a problem.

From what I know at least one Democrat official watcher has lodged a complaint. I'm not hugely up to speed on it all because Trump doesn't in my opinion have a way forward.
 
Nah here's what we do. Only because I knew the guy that run.

Close election?
Wellll, we run a high profile figure to draw votes away from the candidate. Eg against a lib we run someone that will steal votes on a similar, but loud platform. Then have them preference a favourable party to our side once it dribbles down.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

US Election 2024 : Stock and Economic Comment
7 8 9
Replies
171
Views
10K
divs4ever
Mr. Trump (The Donald) To Win in 2024
66 67 68
Replies
1K
Views
42K
farmerge
Posting on Weekends Friday Evening to Monday Morning
Replies
2
Views
364
Dona Ferentes
  • Locked
  • Sticky
February 2025 Stock Tipping Competition Entry Thread!
2 3
Replies
44
Views
3K
farmerge
2025 Full Year Stock Tipping Competiton
7 8 9
Replies
177
Views
12K
mullokintyre
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...