All the discrepancies were against gop. Thousands of votes suddenly being found. Not to mention recorded ballot counts in 72% of Detroit's absentee voting precincts didn't match the number of ballots cast.Interesting.. I followed up the reference and , in fact, there were very good reasons why these discrepancies haven't been in mainstream media.
They mean absolutely nothing. Still worth a read though to learn more about the processes of checking and rechecking votes.
I suggest someone "cherry picked" a couple of useful figures when trying to drum up support for mistrusting the election.
State House Dome: Recounts 'find' votes, not fraud in NH
THERE IS NO evidence of widespread voter fraud in New Hampshire.
It is also true that nearly every election recount “finds” votes.
(Then more explanations of what they did and found)
.... When the recount was complete, Avard had 17,534 votes to 16,729 for Levesque.
The victory margin was 805 votes, exactly the same as before the recount.
State House Dome: Recounts 'find' votes, not fraud in NH
THERE IS NO evidence of widespread voter fraud in New Hampshire.www.unionleader.com
In saying that I don't think there was widespread fraud. I think there was widespread ballot harvesting and granny farming. Thats a grey area that is legal to a point.
Its hard finding a good breakdown of actual numbers. Not the skim counts the mainstream are using. But I can't see Trump winning off what I can find.
Gop simply didn’t have a good mail in ballot strategy. They should have used ballot harvesters or need to start getting their sht together for similar tactics to the dems. This was one of the biggest elections and voter turnout I've seen. Also one of the most suss I've seen in a long time.