- Joined
- 3 July 2009
- Posts
- 27,649
- Reactions
- 24,549
He'd do exactly the same and I would be just as pizzed of with him.That was 30 years ago.
What do you think of what Dutton wants to do now ?
He'd do exactly the same and I would be just as pizzed of with him.
That's why I don't hold any allegiance to either party. They both respond to the set of circumstances that face them, it is how they react that I judge them on, if it is in a manner I agree with fine if not I wont vote for them.
That goes for all sides.
Like I said McGowan IMO is doing a good job, I didn't like the fact he double the electricity supply charge, because that hits those who can least afford it, so I found it a bit hypocritical.
I do like the way he has managed the State border and kept the mining industry running.
I don't care one way or another about banning radar detectors, I don't use them, but it is an infringement on freedoms.
But on balance I'm pretty happy with his performance.
I thought Peter Reith was a nasty piece of work, also Malcolm Fraser.So you were pizzed off with Peter Reith and the Patrick Partners fiasco ?
Strike breaking is a distraction we are now talking about people becoming criminals for not "cooperating" with whatever Dutton and his band of Nazis want them to do.
Do you agree with that ? Did you read the article I posted ?
The U.S will become the Worlds epicentre of instability because it is controlled by the major multinationals, who want to to make the maximum money by building $hit in cheap labour and cheap cost countries, it isn't rocket science. There are 340million people in the U.S watching their lifestyle and hopes disappear to overseas countries, there are 10 million making a killing, yes there will be a lot of unrest.Nouriel Roubini doesn't pull any punches in the piece and paints a pretty ugly picture of what and why Trump could do.
Worth a read IMHO
" The US will thus most likely be the world’s new epicentre of political and geopolitical instability in the months and years ahead. America’s allies will need to hedge their bets against a future return of Trumpism, and strategic rivals will continue to try to destabilise the US through asymmetric warfare. The world is in for a long, ugly, bumpy ride. "
The US is the new focus of global instability | Nouriel Roubini
Donald Trump has few options left but to foment even more chaos both at home and abroadwww.theguardian.com
The U.S will become the Worlds epicentre of instability because it is controlled by the major multinationals, who want to to make the maximum money by building $hit in cheap labour and cheap cost countries, it isn't rocket science. There are 340million people in the U.S watching their lifestyle and hopes disappear to overseas countries, there are 10 million making a killing, yes there will be a lot of unrest.
As the western world runs out of credibility, due to the fact they produce nothing, the third world who are manufacturing everything will start to charge more for their products as their currencies are revalued, then the value of the western world currencies drops because it isn't as valuable then everything costs more.
Pretty straight forward, I think, but hey a bit of real poverty might help switch on the lights. Who knows.
Just my thoughts and I'm grateful I live in Australia, 25 million people with a huge mine in the backyard, so there is plenty of money to go around and plenty of fudge factor to turn it around.
Not so in the U.S IMO.
Just my opinion.
Like I said IFocus the wealth is owned by 10% of the population, the rest are sliding more and more into poverty, the countries where the manufacturing is occurring are seeing their currencies strenghen as per Thailand etc and the wealth imbalance is happening there also.SP the total wealth in the US has never been higher, the move of manufacturing away from the US (still falling under Trump BTW) has actually brought move wealth and made products not previously available to the masses now available.
Open trade and globalisation is the reason, you know the very thing Trump is against.
What hasn't happened is the political will to more fairly distribute that wealth even if they gave health care to all like Australia (the costs and grifting around health would also require addressing) or aggressively promote training etc instead of loading up students with mind boggling debt.
Both sides are guilty Republicans more so, when you don't have wages growth for 30 years or more then you know the system is broken in regards of politics governing for the benefit of the masses.
Instead you hear the BS everyone has unlimited opportunity, everyone can be a any thing they want etc, all from the moneyed elite and beloved by nut cases like the ones fighting for Trump who BTW are going to jail.
Like I said IFocus the wealth is owned by 10% of the population, the rest are sliding more and more into poverty, the countries where the manufacturing is occurring are seeing their currencies strenghen as per Thailand etc and the wealth imbalance is happening there also.
The only way you can base sustainable wage rises is with improvements in productivity, to just keep increasing labour costs by increasing wages makes your product more expensive and less competitive against other countries therefore no one buys your product and you lose more jobs as the companies go broke.
I think grasping the big picture is peoples problem, just throwing more money around indiscriminately sounds wonderfull, and I'm all for it, but the end result is a Greece style economy, with poor public services and extreme poverty.
Australia can afford its healthcare system which is a wonderful thing, but it is only affordable until it can no longer be supported by the underpinning economy.
If the U.S wanted to bring it in I'm sure they could, also they could really hammer that top 10% of filthy rich, to pay for it.
But then you would just get the situation, where as happened here and in the U.K, the top 10% relocate to a lower taxing country, simple really.
The only way to fix the situation is to somehow re introduce higher skilled higher paying jobs, which usually comes from manufacturing, to do that it will necessitate the manufacturers losing some profit margin, which will be the increased labour component or tariffs on the imported products, as has been shown with Trump they aren't happy with that prospect.
A magic wand would be nice, if everything keeps going the way it is.
My apologies if I did, it wasn't intentional, I find the subject really interesting and there really isn't a definitive answer to the problem. So I'm sure we will be discussing it for a long time to come.I think you missed the point cheers.
Like I said IFocus the wealth is owned by 10% of the population, the rest are sliding more and more into poverty, the countries where the manufacturing is occurring are seeing their currencies strenghen as per Thailand etc and the wealth imbalance is happening there also.
The only way you can base sustainable wage rises is with improvements in productivity, to just keep increasing labour costs by increasing wages makes your product more expensive and less competitive against other countries therefore no one buys your product and you lose more jobs as the companies go broke.
I think grasping the big picture is peoples problem, just throwing more money around indiscriminately sounds wonderfull, and I'm all for it, but the end result is a Greece style economy, with poor public services and extreme poverty.
Australia can afford its healthcare system which is a wonderful thing, but it is only affordable until it can no longer be supported by the underpinning economy.
If the U.S wanted to bring it in I'm sure they could, also they could really hammer that top 10% of filthy rich, to pay for it.
But then you would just get the situation, where as happened here and in the U.K, the top 10% relocate to a lower taxing country, simple really.
The only way to fix the situation is to somehow re introduce higher skilled higher paying jobs, which usually comes from manufacturing, to do that it will necessitate the manufacturers losing some profit margin, which will be the increased labour component or tariffs on the imported products, as has been shown with Trump they aren't happy with that prospect.
A magic wand would be nice, if everything keeps going the way it is.
I think UBI is probably inevitable if jobs keep being lost to overseas or to technology.
That is true, but as with your or my household, the spending part isn't a problem the paying the bill is. Sooner or later everything gets maxed out.The spending power of the masses has to be maintained, otherwise the system falls in a heap.
Compare now versus 20 years ago and it's night versus day. Massive change in that time.We could well be the frog in the saucepan with the heat slowly being turned up. Unfortunately the so called protectors of Freedom; ie the Coalition are the worst offenders in taking away our freedoms. The other side has allowed them to do it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?