Garpal Gumnut
Ross Island Hotel
- Joined
- 2 January 2006
- Posts
- 13,695
- Reactions
- 10,307
That's where this whole blocking thing falls over. QldFrog has obviously doubled blocked you so you can't see his posts and any replies to it are not meaningful to you.
FYI here is the post I was replying to:-
"
I disagree, as stated before, if i am not interested in any way by what someone has to say, why should i do it manually?
In that case and to take into account your opinion, which is fair, i think the real question is :
should we have a 2 way block?
I can block someone, but have no issue with this person reading my own posts, even replying and bagging me or turning read in anger in these.
As long as i do not have to read them, i could not care less..
So isnt it the only real question? The 2 way?
"
If we have to keep doing this to keep people in the loop it will get tedious.
Excellent idea. Please implement earliest opportunity.If it helps I would be quite happy to get my man, Švejk, to keep an eye out for conversations between @qldfrog and others that are going astray.
He could then report them to the Intel Committee here at the Hotel who following consultation could send those suitable and appropriate for me to read on to me to post.
This would be on an FSEO ( For Švejk's eyes only ) to avoid any embarrassment to me or @qldfrog or any other partygoers who don't want to party with me, and to ensure if anyone else blocked me we could provide alternate arrangements, perhaps Australia Post or Fed Ex.
Telegram is another alternative and I believe the AFP can sell a person a device for forwarding messages that is very secure.
I could then post them with an alert. Perhaps a new Thread called " Orphan's Party Posts" could be made specifically for those posts in the Members Only Area.
Next month I will be in Cooloongatta and The Northern Rivers getting my man from England who has finally been allowed back in to Australia to sort out the Arnage, so this arrangement with Švejk and the Intel Committee may be only temporary.
gg
I check if i can remove the double bitThat's where this whole blocking thing falls over. QldFrog has obviously doubled blocked you so you can't see his posts and any replies to it are not meaningful to you.
FYI here is the post I was replying to:-
"
I disagree, as stated before, if i am not interested in any way by what someone has to say, why should i do it manually?
In that case and to take into account your opinion, which is fair, i think the real question is :
should we have a 2 way block?
I can block someone, but have no issue with this person reading my own posts, even replying and bagging me or turning read in anger in these.
As long as i do not have to read them, i could not care less..
So isnt it the only real question? The 2 way?
"
If we have to keep doing this to keep people in the loop it will get tedious.
Yes there is this option and i just checked it, so i ignore/block as per my lenghty posts above, yet by not having the 2 way block option on, i should not interfere on threads smooth work and remove issue such as the one aboveI check if i can remove the double bit
As someone who has used the ignore/block feature to avoid aggressive personal attacks, and then had the members I blocked, stalk me and troll every subsequent post I made, I am a big fan of the 2 way block.
I can only imagine trolls and flamers being against the 2 way block, obviously it disempowers their agenda and so I am not surprised they see it as "cowardly". As for an "echo chamber mentality" I think thats nonsense, I encourage the opinions and views of those who have different perspectives to mine - its the ad hominem attacks and trolling that I object to.
There are plenty of members who I have little in common with as a long term investor, but I enjoy reading their comments and discussing approaches with them.
Seriously, if I couldn't block some of the members here, I would leave the forum. Life is too short for that ****.
Hi @galumay ,Looking back to the start of the thread, nothing has changed for me from when the 2 way block was 1.
+1 on this.I care because it allows the flamers and trolls to stalk me and launch ad hominem attacks that all the other members can see. Then their responses are visible to me so the trolls still get heard. The one way block is just fuel for their hate and vitriol. Thats why they are so opposed to the 2 way block, it completely de-powers them.
Ah no worries. It’s not my first rodeo. Most of these dudes would never say it to my face… they hide behind anonymity and sticky keyboards
I feel bad for them. They want to be the victim, because they can’t face themselves. They are so unhappy that they feel the need to put someone else down for that very vapid blast of pleasure it brings them. I wish them joy.
Fair.i guess i had few of these and had so low appreciation of the individuals involved that it did not affect me the least.but to each his own ( is that the expression?)I care because it allows the flamers and trolls to stalk me and launch ad hominem attacks that all the other members can see. Then their responses are visible to me so the trolls still get heard. The one way block is just fuel for their hate and vitriol. Thats why they are so opposed to the 2 way block, it completely de-powers them.
Just unignored 2 members, the ones i could have a face to face chat with, irritating but maybe i can handle them with the covid heat removed?.Fair.i guess i had few of these and had so low appreciation of the individuals involved that it did not affect me the least.but to each his own ( is that the expression?)
So blocking with optional 2 ways is maybe the best after all.
Is 2 way option available per member blocked @Joe Blow ? I do not think so?More work for you software but a possible refinement?
I think i have contributed all my views so now will read this thread silently.
Enjoy the weekend, weather is nice,market closed ,your blocks are working and politicians silent for the day!?
there's a conflation of virtue happening here.
1. I have been blocked by qldfrog for many months
2. Very recently, that block has lifted
3. I would prefer to participate in the broad church of ASF, not some selective subset .
4. I do not consider myself a troll. I do have a sense of humour, I generally don't rise to the bait.
5. If anyone thinks I am a troll, please tell me. Maybe a good filtration will do me the world of good; I will go to the reeducation camp of your choice.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?