Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

THR - Thor Energy

Ann. released in AIM

THOR MINING PLC

Memorandum of Understanding

Hunan Nonferrous Metals Holding Group

Dated: 17 April 2007

Thor Mining PLC (“Thor” or the “Company”) the specialist metals company currently focussed on advancing tungsten-molybdenum and uranium projects in the Northern Territory of Australia, today announced an update to the Memorandum of Understanding (the “MOU”) with China's Hunan Nonferrous Metals Holdings Group Co, Ltd (“HNG”) in regard to its Molyhil Tungsten-Molybdenum project (“Molyhil”).

The original terms of the MOU allowed for a period of due diligence to be conducted by HNG until 15 April 2007. Subsequently, if HNG decided to proceed it was the intention of both Thor and HNG to complete binding terms and suitable off-take arrangements by 30 April 2007.

HNG approached Thor, late Friday afternoon 13 April 2007, to consider extending the above deadlines as the due diligence was not yet complete and the revised JORC resource for Molyhil is due shortly.

Thor has today agreed with HNG to:

1. Postpone the date to conclude due diligence until 30 April 2007; and

2. Postpone the date for completion of commercial negotiations until 11 May 2007.

Thor and HNG continue to work closely together on the outstanding due diligence matters, and Thor is optimistic that all outstanding matters will be resolved.

The parties are scheduled to meet in Perth, to commence commercial negotiations, on Monday 30 April 2007. In preparation for those discussions Penfold Marketing are currently visiting HNG in China; and Thor’s taxation and other advisors are preparing various briefing documents.

Thor’s consultants will determine a revised JORC resource as soon as the assay results from the recent drilling become available. Thor is endeavouring to have this completed within the above time restrictions.

The Directors believe HNG is a dominant producer of nonferrous and minor metals in China. Thor understands that HNG owns the world largest deposits of tungsten and bismuth, is the world's largest producer of cemented carbides, and owns China's largest zinc and antimony smelters. The Directors also believe HNG is a significant producer of lead, silver, indium, tantalum and niobium. HNG is headquartered in Changsha City, Hunan, Peoples Republic of China and is the majority shareholder of Hunan Nonferrous Metals Corporation Limited, listed in Hong Kong in May 2006. The Directors believe the HNG group’s combined current market capitalisation to be in excess of US$2 billion.

The Company has requested a trading halt in its shares and warrants on the Australian Stock Exchange (the “ASX”) pending the release of this announcement on the ASX. The announcement will be released on the ASX prior to the start of trading tomorrow, Wednesday 18 April 2007.

Enquiries:
John Young
+ 61 (0)419 954 020
Thor Mining PLC
Chief Executive Officer

John Simpson
020 7512 0191
ARM Corporate Finance Limited
Nominated Adviser

Leesa Peters
or
Jos Simpson
020 7429 6600
020 7429 6603
Conduit PR Limited
Public Relations/UK

Nicolas Read
+ 61 (0) 8 9388 1474
Read Corporate
Public Relations/Australia

Updates on the Company’s activities are regularly posted on Thor’s website www.thormining.com which includes a facility to register to receive these updates by email.

END
 
Trading halt pending an ann.Missed this as been out all day but results out from recent drill ing program.Results are positive and were announced at 10.20am and then another ann at 11.20 puts it into trading halt pending release of infor on MOU with Hunan Non Ferrous Metals.Sound great,cant wait till Monday
 
MOU off!!!!!
BTV and RAB knew the deal would not go ahead. if that's not inside trading then pigs will fly ASICC should query both but I'm still holding there are other fish in the sea looking for food

cheers laurie
 
Is there a business for Chinese "mining" companies in MOU negotiating - theres been a few now I think that have fallen through. An ann re Chinese MOU plans certainly adds to the SP and provides a nice trading opp for those in the know.

THR claims it has others lined up but this could drift a bit until something is confirmed - might be nice buying opp? still seems to be volume on the buy side and supprot for shares @ 35 / warrants @ 25
 
trading op means opportunity to buy now at a low as it will probably go back up? how do u work out the support?

oh just wondering, did thor price go up because of the contract with hunan or for other reasons?
 
egads! how unforgiving is this market? Thor's assets are good but after the Hunan and BTV/RAB's biggies, even today lots of 3k and 5k shares are going through...even mom and pop investors throwing in the towel. a bit excessive, this sell off.
 
egads! how unforgiving is this market? Thor's assets are good but after the Hunan and BTV/RAB's biggies, even today lots of 3k and 5k shares are going through...even mom and pop investors throwing in the towel. a bit excessive, this sell off.

Hi guys,

I was in THR.
made a post in the UK site about it

http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?display=discussion&code=cotn:THR.L&it=le

I found about alot of info on this stock etc.

here are some facts I found out about the stock.

From Commsec announcements.
17/04/2007 8:29AM 1 Batavia Holding
16/04/2007 4:15PM 1 BTV ann: Disposal of Part of Thor Investment

then
17/04/2007 6:56PM 2 MOU with Hunan - Extension

Look who is the company security for BTV, THR and TNG.

BTV
http://www.asx.com.au/asx/research/...panyName=&principalActivity=&industryGroup=NO

THR
http://www.asx.com.au/asx/research/...panyName=&principalActivity=&industryGroup=NO

TNG
http://www.asx.com.au/asx/research/...panyName=&principalActivity=&industryGroup=NO

looking at the performane of all the older companies etc and the sell off by BTV
16/04/2007 4:15PM 1 BTV ann: Disposal of Part of Thor Investment

...... before the announcements made me go hmmmmm.

So I did alot of digging around ... about the company and the people running it.

sold out last week.

This is only meant to be information.

I hope it helps

hongwong
 
I think you may have this one wrong have you DYOR into their Uranium holding or are you just looking at the Moly only :2twocents

cheers laurie
 
I think you may have this one wrong have you DYOR into their Uranium holding or are you just looking at the Moly only :2twocents

cheers laurie

Hey Laurie,

It not about being right or wrong. Just trying to share stuff with each other.

Take from commsec in announcements and tre annual report for Thor
26/09/2006 11:33AM 31 Annual Report - 30 June 2006
on page 3,
An area wide research was done in 79-81 for Uranium

Question I ask is to find this research and also ask why was there no go ahead for the mine ?

Uranium holding :

Taken from Commsec
from : 13/02/2007 1:32PM 9 Uranium Update - Significant Results

At the Haddock Creek and Daicos prospects, a number of sub-parallel pegmatites were
surveyed, with a maximum count of 19,000 cps. Four samples were taken within
EL24736, with one 1.5kg sample returning a very high uranium result of 8.87% U with
associated REE (rare earth elements),tantalum, niobium, and yttrium. Samples HR12,
HR14 and HR15 were also anomalous, with results ranging from 146ppm to 0.27%
uranium.

these are samples pick off the ground, not drilled. (I could be wrong).

Just say they do have an Uranium holdingand they can mine go forward with the mine

I would be intrest if anyone knows about mining rights with THOR and how far they are into this?

If anyone can help .. it would be great

thanks
hongwong
 
Hello All,

people have ask me in private message about what I know about this stock.

I dont know anything more then you or that can be found on ther internet.

Here is what I have written back to them. I am not trying to scare anyone, make anyone buy sell or hold. This is up you. I am looking at learning and if I have made any mistakes please point them out.

________

I am not an insider trader. I found all my news on the internet.

I was in THR back in December when a friend told me about the shares. I started looking into the shares etc.

Rang the CEO to quiz him about the mine, buying of equipment etc.

I learnt alot about mining companies from THR.

There are phases in mining company :
Phase 1) exploring
Phase 2) drilling for samples
Phase 3) mining

I believe all the three companies that I have listed have only been in exploring status because the yield amount has been small.

THR was trying to do phase 2, and try and move to phase 3.

Here is something I asked a friend to look at for me in December ;

Need your advice on THR.

Was reading the reports.


I have found the following

100,000 MTU of tungsten oxide mined per year @ 204 per mtu.

1,000,000 lbs of Molybdenum mined per year. @20/lb.

The project is over 4 years.

Therefore

100,000(mined per year) x 204(price) x 4( years) = 81,600,000

1,000,000(mined per year) x 20(price) x 4(years) = 80,000,000

=161,600,000 profit


______________


The capital cost = 44.5 million

Operating cost is 94/tonne

Project viability is 300,000 tpa and processing operation.

Therefore 300,000 x 94 = 28,200,000 million per year

28,200,000 x 4 = 128,000,000 for the life of the project.

The fore 128,000,000 + 44,500,000 = 172,500,000 (cost)


161,600,000 - 172,500,000 = -(10,900,000)


I found all this stuff from commec.com.au from the announce they have made.

13/02/2007 1:32PM 9
Uranium Update - Significant Results

31/01/2007 3:52PM 5
Second Quarter Cashflow Report

24/01/2007 1:32PM 12
Second Quarter Activities Report

15/01/2007 2:47PM 2 Change of Directors Interest Notice

05/01/2007 11:13AM 2
Signs Exclusive Mandate for Molyhil

04/12/2006 9:37AM 9
Molyhil FS Confirms Viability of New Mine Development


Just wondering if you can confirm this or am I not seeing the project right ?

Also can you get a more detail projection report(break down) from THR, otherwise I will send them an email asking them about it.


Molybdenum – the metal is very common. It used to harden steel because of the storage of tungsten.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molybdenum

China has a lot of Molybdenum. But what makes it interesting is this,

Why would china invest in Australia?
Answer I believe is the following, China has energy restriction and if you have been to China you would know why (so many people).
So China Steel industry needs Molybdenum, but it can not produce it because of the energy constraints not because of a lack of Molybdenum , so it looking for overseas stocks.

This has all changed due to the following:
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/sto...x?guid={DDFF3A59-26B0-4E23-AF73-E46EAFB2981A}
Please note I have a full time job not trading shares, I trade shares to grow my investments.

I found all my stuff from the internet.
 
So I did alot of digging around ... about the company and the people running it.

sold out last week.

This is only meant to be information.

I hope it helps

hongwong

Are you from Hong Kong :confused: maybe why the grammar is odd it appears you are not happy with what you found and sold is that correct and if so what did you find out that made you sell

cheers laurie
 
Are you from Hong Kong :confused: maybe why the grammar is odd it appears you are not happy with what you found and sold is that correct and if so what did you find out that made you sell

cheers laurie


Hi Laurie,

I live in australia. I was not born in australia and english is not my first language .. sorry about that. I am trying to improve this everyday.

Yes that is right I was not happy with what I found, but this does not mean I am right or wrong.
Just my option, hopefully u can show me a different option about Thor!!
 
hongwong

No need to be sorry you are doing fine.I assume you mean opinion sorry my reason to hold THR will be different to yours that's why you need to do your own research and if you feel it's too risky then you have made the right decision good luck

cheers laurie
 
Laurie - I have sent you a private message via Aussie Stock Forums, as you do not permit emails, but it is showing up as unread. OTY and regards.

hongwong

No need to be sorry you are doing fine.I assume you mean opinion sorry my reason to hold THR will be different to yours that's why you need to do your own research and if you feel it's too risky then you have made the right decision good luck

cheers laurie
 
Very interesting "please explain" announcement today, explained well in the following article in The Australian this afternoon.

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,21665774-5005200,00.html

I dont know, but that BTV disposal of shares in THR sure looks very dodgy. I know thats not especially unique in this industry, but ASIC will possibly be having a close look at this one.

I dont hold, good luck to those who do.
 
I just don't buy it - BTV have plenty of cash on hand and they are experienced 'operators' they wouldn't pull this ###t if they were privvy to inside information in relation to the THR sale (and if they were then they are absolute morons) and all that that implies in terms of ASIC what not... This is jumping at shadows in my opinion...
 
Very interesting "please explain" announcement today, explained well in the following article in The Australian this afternoon.

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,21665774-5005200,00.html

I dont know, but that BTV disposal of shares in THR sure looks very dodgy. I know thats not especially unique in this industry, but ASIC will possibly be having a close look at this one.

I dont hold, good luck to those who do.

If this happens all the time I assume other people are clever enough not to sign everything with one person from two different companies.
 
I just don't buy it - BTV have plenty of cash on hand and they are experienced 'operators' they wouldn't pull this ###t if they were privvy to inside information in relation to the THR sale (and if they were then they are absolute morons) and all that that implies in terms of ASIC what not... This is jumping at shadows in my opinion...

Sorry, you are kidding arent you?

2 executives of Thor who also happen to be the Managing Director and Company Secretary of Batavia werent privy to the information that the deal might be on shaky ground?

So their sale of shares in THR was based on what exactly? If the deal was about to be finalised as was expected by the market, then why sell, given that confirmation would give the sp a powerful further boost?

And if there was some problem, which there obviously was, i can understand their logic in wanting to dump shares at a premium. But unfort for everyone else, dumping their shares based on information that hasnt been, but should have been released to the market, is...well...sort of not allowed, putting it mildly!

What it means for you, if you hold, is that BTV were able to dump shares based on information that they knew, but you DIDNT.

Read the twisted logic in THR's response to the ASX. Its disturbing.
 
Very interesting "please explain" announcement today, explained well in the following article in The Australian this afternoon.

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,21665774-5005200,00.html

I dont know, but that BTV disposal of shares in THR sure looks very dodgy. I know thats not especially unique in this industry, but ASIC will possibly be having a close look at this one.

I dont hold, good luck to those who do.


if you look at BTV books from commsec

they have not made any money for 3 years

as of 2005 they only held 1 million in the bank

then in 2006 they have 10 million in the bank

Look at the borrowings

From commsec BTV
27/04/2007 10:08AM 5 Third Quarter Cashflow Report

7.8 millions in cash
7 million in borrowed income
 
Top