- Joined
- 26 March 2014
- Posts
- 19,661
- Reactions
- 11,962
I've seen Independence Day and I dispute that rating. I doubt if it shows lesbians sticking their tongues down each others throats.
It's pretty obvious you are trolling for reaction.
I've seen Independence Day and I dispute that rating. I doubt if it shows lesbians sticking their tongues down each others throats.
Are you the rating Board are you?
You are not trying to deny my freedom of speech I hope ?
No questioning your credentials.
If ID4 had a scene where a couple is doing the bond ad thing, it probably will get an R18+ rating. Either way, he found it offensive to his kids so what's the problem?
So it's OK to mock people's faith to sell papers, but not cool when a father is upset at things shown, without warnings, that he believe would harm his children?
Seems your definition of free speech only involves doing things that upset people.
It's always "OK" to mock superstition and fictitious mythology. Religious superstition deservers no respect and should receive none from any rational, free thinking person. Of course fear and intimidation can be used to muzzle apostates and disciples of free speech.So it's OK to mock people's faith..
While the numbers she quotes in the vid are not backed with reference to hard data, what part of what she said do you proclaim was clueless? If you want stats on the large number of Muslims that hold what non-Muslims would consider "radical" views they are everywhere if you bother to look (very small sample)...Is there another view of Brigette Gabriel and whether she actually has a clue about she is saying?
She was challenged in the video exchange and gave an aggressive response and quite a good one at that. Attacking the messenger does not diminish the force of the argument she was making. It indeed does not matter how many peaceful Muslims there are when thousands are being slaughtered and millions oppressed by fundamentalist Islamists.Is it just easy to accept an aggressive, bombastic persons words without challenge.
Hardly a neutral perspective from a obvious apologist for Islam. How effective has working with "peaceful" Muslims been in stemming the tide of violence perpetrated by extremist Muslims? Perhaps just as effective as working with peaceful Germans or Japanese would have been in WW2?I did some more looking on Brigette. Perhaps another perspective.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2MrtjdEyNtc
Hardly a neutral perspective from a obvious apologist for Islam. How effective has working with "peaceful" Muslims been in stemming the tide of violence perpetrated by extremist Muslims? Perhaps just as effective as working with peaceful Germans or Japanese would have been in WW2?
The President of Turkey is one man. Does he speak for every Muslim ?
Ask him.
Why don't you do a survey of Muslims on the street and ask them ?
As regards to Bintang's claim that there are no moderate Muslims, you are missing the subtlety of what he is saying. It was obvious from the start that he was not saying that all those who claim to be and act like moderate Muslims are lying and are in fact extreme in their views, but saying that those who claim to be and act like moderate Muslims are in fact not really Muslims according to the dictates of their faith. If a true Muslim means following the Islamic doctrine of the Quran and Hadith, then a moderate (by our standards) Muslim is not a true Muslim using that definition.
What do you make of the comments of Erdogan, PM of Turkey, that he posted above. Erdogan is endorsing Bintang's view. That also explains why Turkey is one of the biggest supporters of ISIS. Additionally, Erdogan said just a day or two ago that the Charlie Hebdo killings were actually organised by the US and Israel. Typical denials by Muslim leaders that always try to disassociate Islam from such barbarism. Erdogan is also the person who said just a month ago that women were lesser persons than men (you did notice all the Muslim protesters hitting the street over that statement?).
Muslims are in fact not really Muslims according to the dictates of their faith. If a true Muslim means following the Islamic doctrine of the Quran and Hadith, then a moderate (by our standards) Muslim is not a true Muslim using that definition.
….. and will leave you to your Islamophobia.
.Muslims are in fact not really Muslims according to the dictates of their faith. If a true Muslim means following the Islamic doctrine of the Quran and Hadith, then a moderate (by our standards) Muslim is not a true Muslim using that definition
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.