- Joined
- 26 March 2014
- Posts
- 20,056
- Reactions
- 12,627
There we could discuss who made a degree a prerequisite for a baristas job and who brought in competency standards to gut the apprenticeship training scheme, that should be a good start.
Yes same as the better schools brain fart that Labor started and then the next Govt has to fund and nothing can be done about it until Labor get back in, or if they tried the media start screaming about it.While the Coalition was still in government.
Australian universities brace for ‘ugly’ 2022 after budget cuts
Funding reduced by nearly 10% over three years, while Tafe spending slashed by 24%www.theguardian.com
Is there any proof anywhere where they've polled every indiginous in Australia to say 80% of them want it?Check out this take on The Voice. Funny, on the ball.
Well, that's an indication that the political system itself is broken and it's probably a result of many things including ridiculously small election terms ( should be 5 years) and the fact that political donors have more influence on policy than normal voters.Yes same as the better schools brain fart that Labor started and then the next Govt has to fund and nothing can be done about it until Labor get back in, or if they tried the media start screaming about it.
NDIS is another one, Labor are slashing the funding as they should, do you think for one minute the media would let the other side do it?
What beggars belief is that many can't see the brain washing going on, well that is for a while, then Labor get thrown out and the cycle repeats.
Who will be responsible for the financial fallout if the voice gets up, it probably wont be Labor because they are already on the nose.
Wash rinse repeat.
Your post actually supports smurfs points, Labor are fighting tooth and nail for those most needy, social housing and increasing the aboriginal affairs portfolio, which will be funded by the middle class wage slave.
Meanwhile the rich are gong to get a tax cut, while the value of their property portfolios skyrocket.
Meanwhile the aspirational wage slave sees their dream of buying a house dissapear, which is the main purpose that they go to work for, so really what @Smurf1976 said is actually far more an accurate summation than your cult like hyme sheet belief in a bygone era.
No one is saying that those less fortunate shouldnt be looked after, but when you end up with workers ending up back in the social housing queues as it was in the 1960's, have Labor really looked after the middle class? Pointing the finger at the opposition no longer works, the opposition didn't lift the retirement age, they didn't hammer the single mothers, they didn't stuff the education system and they aren't the ones who are currently shattering workers dreams by mass imigration and soaring rents and house prices.
That's what the blue collar sees, not some bygone dream and wives tales, that's why the middle class is leaving Labor in droves and their support has shifted to the elites as the gap between the the haves and have nots accelerates.
One of the main underlying problems Labor has is that it has been hijacked by the elites, it is full of upwardly mobile intellectuals, lawyers etc that have never lived in the bush, it's become an upper class w@nk tank of dreamers IMO
The workers who are from France are rioting in the streets because the pension age has gone to 64.Is there free alcohol on that trip?
Were the workers stripped of their penalty rates wage slaves?
Who stripped, defunded, contracted out TAFE?
No one ever polls "every person" to get an idea of the communities views. They do undertake surveys which poll a representative number.Is there any proof anywhere where they've polled every indiginous in Australia to say 80% of them want it?
Is there any proof anywhere where they've polled every indiginous in Australia to say 80% of them want it?
Usually with a demagraphic group that return the outcome the polster requires.No one ever polls "every person" to get an idea of the communities views. They do undertake surveys which poll a representative number.
Fact check: Do the polls show that Indigenous support for the Voice is between 80 and 90 per cent?
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has claimed surveys show Indigenous Australians support the Voice at a rate between 80 and 90 per cent. Is that correct? RMIT ABC Fact Check investigates.www.abc.net.au
There's no real accurate proof that 80% of them want it, it's another self proclaimed fact check. Surveys can also be manipulated to get the answers people want and on top of this, they're very small samples to take seriously.No one ever polls "every person" to get an idea of the communities views. They do undertake surveys which poll a representative number.
Fact check: Do the polls show that Indigenous support for the Voice is between 80 and 90 per cent?
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has claimed surveys show Indigenous Australians support the Voice at a rate between 80 and 90 per cent. Is that correct? RMIT ABC Fact Check investigates.www.abc.net.au
Exactly, they had the abattoir there for years, I moved a generator from there to Kununurra in the 1980's when it shut down, why not restart meat export from there?A view from outback Wyndham.
'They want jobs, not handouts': Why locals say the Voice could break a vicious cycle in this outback town
As debate rages in remote communities about whether a Voice to Parliament will improve the lives of Indigenous Australians, leaders in WA's northern-most town hope it can lift the next generation out of hopelessness to a place of prosperity.www.abc.net.au
Sorry missed that, I'm on the phone. LolWhile the Coalition was still in government.
Australian universities brace for ‘ugly’ 2022 after budget cuts
Funding reduced by nearly 10% over three years, while Tafe spending slashed by 24%www.theguardian.com
I won't deny for a moment that the Coalition has also run off the rails. They've turned into a party of anti-science wreckers that dishes out spite while preaching religion so I'm in no way defending them.Without addressing that if I may I think your post lacks context.
The Coalition are currently fighting tooth and nail against Labors current legislation before parliament benefiting the very people you mention above.
The Coalition have also fought tooth and nail against Labor's housing policy to try and help address lack of housing for the disadvantage (I know it won't address the whole problem but its something against the Coalitions nothing)
@Smurf1976 This hits the nail right smack bang in the middle of the head. Is there a politican of any persusian who has credibity, even a tiny amount, worth mentioning.I won't deny for a moment that the Coalition has also run off the rails. They've turned into a party of anti-science wreckers that dishes out spite while preaching religion so I'm in no way defending them.
Labor is however in government federally and in every state except Tasmania so it's the party of relevance right now.
Using the housing example, the basic problem I see with Labor is this:
They have it right with saying there's a need for social housing. For those at the bottom of society in economic terms that's always likely to be needed and credit where it's due for recognising that.
But what about the other ~two thirds who aren't at the bottom and who also aren't elites of any description? That is the ordinary workers, small business owners, retirees with modest wealth and so on. What's Labor doing for them?
For the bulk of the population what they're looking for in a house is just that, a freestanding house on land. That's by far the largest part of the market and on that point I'm not going to mess about. To provide that requires broad scale land development. It requires subdivisions with roads, footpaths and utilities put in and done so on a mass scale.
Now the elites have a name for this, they call it "urban sprawl" and use that term in a derogatory manner and consider it bad to the point it must be stopped.
Therein lies the problem. Labor keeps trying to appease the elites rather than delivering what the mainstream are screaming out for. That goes for pretty much everything, housing's just the example.
Meanwhile the Liberals stand out the front doing a chicken dance while yelling expletives and waving a Bible they've never read anyway.
If the "No" vote prevails then it won't be because Australians hate Aboriginal people or even that they don't want to help them succeed. It'll be because the mainstream are fed up with politicians of all persuasions and their hangers on coming up with every distraction they can think of which enables them to continue ignoring the majority in the middle.
The thing about all that being, if government got on and looked after the mainstream, if they had a sound track record of doing that, then they'd have the credibility to get the Voice through easily. It's that they don't have credibility that has people so cautious.
Even the new Govt, has realised the absolute FUp of the last 10 years and have told Unis, unless they can show that teacher graduates can teach the times table and basic english they will lose funding.
So I'm a bit disappointed your normal open mind, can't see the irony in your post.
Meanwhile the current Gov is trying to undo the mess that 10's of billions of extra funding that was poured into the education system in the last 10 years has still seen the slide continue.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?