Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

The Voice

Jump to new
sptrawler said:
The housing issue is making the elites richer and at the same time adding $hit loads of extra stamp duty to the State coffers.
This is creating the greatest wealth divide in a long time, I really cant see how it will end well.
Meanwhile all the talk is about dissadvantage, well workers paying over $2 a litre to get to work and watching the value of their savings losing ground to house prices, is pretty disheartening.
There is a lot of 'not happy Jan' going on ATM.
Click to expand...
@sptrawler oh well put Sir sp, but I wonder if the Powers That Be are really cncerned how the peasants, the ones that foot the bill, are travelling, as it appears to me the so-called disadvantaged will be the advantaged if this mongrel vote wins.
 
TimeISmoney said:
Think of why we've had to go pr0n a higher education system to the highest bidder and push real estate to ridiculous prices where govts have a good feed all round. Australia is going to be a joke in 10 years time, the holes in the ground will be all cut off by environmentalists and then we can all beg the govt for food that comes from third-world countries that gets grown by people who get paid $1/hr to work.
Click to expand...
Wouldn't be surprised if China doesn't become a major food supplier, starting with milk. Over the years have bought many thousands of dairy cattle. Sheep also were a huge investment up untill a couple of years ago.
 
wayneL said:
Albo stepped in it here LMAO incompetent

Click to expand...

He's a total clown, the true extent of what labor has done won't come out until they're gone.

xzxczx.PNG
 
sptrawler said:
The housing issue is making the elites richer and at the same time adding $hit loads of extra stamp duty to the State coffers.
This is creating the greatest wealth divide in a long time, I really cant see how it will end well.
Meanwhile all the talk is about dissadvantage, well workers paying over $2 a litre to get to work and watching the value of their savings losing ground to house prices, is pretty disheartening.
There is a lot of 'not happy Jan' going on ATM.
Click to expand...
Everything to do with an investment property costs more, insurance, land rates, and even the water charges cost more in Brisbane. The big winner is capital gain taxes because people barely pay it on personal property of residence. Then you have all forced services where everyone pays GST. The rental market will end up being another industry run by sharks because they'll be the only people game to touch it.
 
Got an hour to spare? Two of the most sensible folks in the debate... One blackfella, one whitefella.

 
wayneL said:
The AEC is not fit for purpose

Click to expand...

Well I voted this morning (Tuesday( had the usual questions asked and one was had I voted elsewhere on the referendum. Then I had my name ticked/crossed off on the laptop the lady was using. I don't think double voting by someone with the same name, at the same address, with the same suburb is possible.
 
farmerge said:
Well I voted this morning (Tuesday( had the usual questions asked and one was had I voted elsewhere on the referendum. Then I had my name ticked/crossed off on the laptop the lady was using. I don't think double voting by someone with the same name, at the same address, with the same suburb is possible.
Click to expand...
Doesn't say that people can't move from booth to booth, it would be interesting to know how this is handled in normal elections.
 
If they admit to getting double votes, it is obvious to blind Freddy that it goes on. Singing your name off means nothing, all they've used at every Qld election that I've been to is a bit of paper with names on it that they cross off.
 
TimeISmoney said:
If they admit to getting double votes, it is obvious to blind Freddy that it goes on. Singing your name off means nothing, all they've used at every Qld election that I've been to is a bit of paper with names on it that they cross off.
Click to expand...

Yes it appears to be an "honesty" system.

Probably there are not enough staff to check if people have voted more than once.
 
SirRumpole said:
Yes it appears to be an "honesty" system.

Probably there are not enough staff to check if people have voted more than once.
Click to expand...
They have technology that knows more about us than we do ourselves, facial recognition tech, cameras that can detect whether you're on your phone or not wearing a seatbelt etc....

.... And they don't have tech to know if someone votes multiple times? Yet you cop a fine if you don't vote?

Something doesn't add up here.
 
Should the YES campaign get up it will set some dangerous precedents.

  • Enshrine in Indigenous Culture Alcoholism and Drug Dependence.
  • Enshrine in Australian Culture the Primacy of Welfare Earnings over that of Work Earnings
  • Embed the fallacy that throwing money at a culture failing to evolve is not counterproductive to its peoples.
  • Set up a bureaucracy based on race.

Should the No campaign get up it will give Australia and its Indigenous Peoples a chance to sort out the problems of Australia within an Australian context assuring an Australian fair go solution.

I'm voting NO.

gg
 
Garpal Gumnut said:
Should the YES campaign get up it will set some dangerous precedents.

  • Enshrine in Indigenous Culture Alcoholism and Drug Dependence.
  • Enshrine in Australian Culture the Primacy of Welfare Earnings over that of Work Earnings
  • Embed the fallacy that throwing money at a culture failing to evolve is not counterproductive to its peoples.
  • Set up a bureaucracy based on race.

Should the No campaign get up it will give Australia and its Indigenous Peoples a chance to sort out the problems of Australia within an Australian context assuring an Australian fair go solution.

I'm voting NO.

gg
Click to expand...
gg I voted yesterday with a NO vote from me.
Had my name ticked or crossed off on the computer which I assume is linked to a master one.
 
SirRumpole said:
Doesn't say that people can't move from booth to booth, it would be interesting to know how this is handled in normal elections.
Click to expand...
After I cast my resounding No vote yesterday, as there wasn't anyone queuing to get the necessry How to Vote pamphets, I spent a few minutes taking to the two blokes outside.
The Yes man wasn't very positive with his followers saying not many were going in the affirmative.
On the other hand, the No man was more than happy with what he was hearing.
Perhaps this will be a resounding disclosure of what a waste of taxpayers $360 million is.
Two points of view reached on that.
 

Similar threads

bigdog
Where will all the money come from to fund the stimulus?
2 3
Replies
50
Views
5K
tech/a
tech/a
bigdog
J Capital Research
Replies
1
Views
2K
greggles
greggles
N
The Australian Human Rights Commission: A national disgrace
3 4 5
Replies
85
Views
15K
Tisme
Tisme
R
The American use of War Pretext Incidents
Replies
6
Views
9K
sptrawler
sptrawler
R
The Financial Endgame
Replies
18
Views
9K
qldfrog
qldfrog
Top