IFocus
You are arguing with a Galah
- Joined
- 8 September 2006
- Posts
- 7,472
- Reactions
- 4,469
You keep ignoring the rational alternative which is a legislated Voice which would pass imo.
The option of repealing it needs to be there in case of corruption or malfeasance as with any government body.
No I haven't and have addressed this before as has Rob.
Putting the Voice into the constitution brings recognition for Aboriginals and says only that it exists nothing more nada zip.
It is an advisory body only nothing more nada zip.
How it operates is a matter for parliament same as any other arm of government there are no guide lines relating from the constitution on how that is.
The wording has been ticked off by previous high court chief justice and justices appointed by the Coalition along with a number conservative highly regarded constitution experts.
Compare that to the fear mongering posted in this thread its quite extortionary.