Sean K
Moderator
- Joined
- 21 April 2006
- Posts
- 22,307
- Reactions
- 11,592
I hope so Bill, but I think Obama might be the man to do it. I'm not to sure about Hillary. Can Bill come back for another term? I think he's more popular now than ever!billhill said:Yes Kennas i too am guilty of bashing the yanks for their apparent ignorance, but the US is a great nation and come 2 years time i think it will be back to the good old clinton days literally. The US have had bad leadership which has quite frankly made them vunerable to critcisms they would have shaken off during the clinton era. They may have continued problems in the middle east but under new leadership i think they will return to their former glory.
True, Americans are generally quite ignorant when it come to the rest of the world, however it's far easier to whip the mob into a vengeful frenzy when they only know the information you want them to know.. Again, check out the term Blowback..Kennas said:the American public are so blindly insular and have no understanding of the rest of the world that I would not be surprised if they rally behind old Dubya, and be led to their inevitable doom
Kennas said:I am not too sure about China and Russia though. They are becomming more and more powerful by the day. There will come a time when the US wants to do something and they say, 'NO, you are not in control of the world now!' It's not too far off.......
Correct, Bombers/Fighters/Tanks/Warships become terribly ineffective without Oil.. Make up whatever story you like to justify the action (and hope the general populace don't cotton on..), but secure the Oil at all cost..billhill said:Thats why i think an attack on iran will come sooner rather then later. The US knows if they can secure large energy supplies before russia or china can do anything about it they will remain at the top of the tree for many years to come..
Interesting you mention Hugo, because he is leading a wave of anti Americanism in Latin America (especially in El Salvador and Equador) that will ultimately mean the US will be facing fronts all around them. I wouldn't be surprised if quite a few Latin American countries ditch capitilist free markets (maybe not Chile, Brazil and Argetina) and go more socialist/agrarian.kgee said:Definitely a hot topic
Is it a case of now or never for the bush administration?They probably only have a 2 year window of opportunity b4 elections?
Will china and russia stay on the sidelines? Beijging olympics next year...china's first time on the world stage
In my mind if I was Ahamanjihindad (?) I wouldn't be pushing the issue untill after the next US elections
Haven't heard anything from chavez for a while I'd imagine he'll be putting his 2 cents in soon and stirring up the pot
its a crazy world
gotta go.... have a game of tennis to play
I'll put it this way. Current Venezuelan production is more than the entire world surplus capacity. So demand can not be met without Venezuela in the medium term.kennas said:I'm still not sure what long term strategic impact Hugo will have however. Not sure how critical Venezuela's oil is to the world (US) economy....
kennas said:In regard to the US being a great nation, I am not too sure. I think that the western consumerist value ideal will be the end of the human race.
kennas said:Back to the Middle East, I am actually very interested in the route cause of the long time strife there. Is it religion? Or, is it people not having jobs?? Or a football team to barrack for???
Buster said:No matter how you look at it, it seems the Oil has been the cause of conflict for some 80 years a least..
kennas said:Interesting you mention Hugo, because he is leading a wave of anti Americanism in Latin America (especially in El Salvador and Equador) that will ultimately mean the US will be facing fronts all around them. I wouldn't be surprised if quite a few Latin American countries ditch capitilist free markets (maybe not Chile, Brazil and Argetina) and go more socialist/agrarian.
1. Probably all three - plus (as someone said once, Golda Mair?), Moses with all his wisdom decided to found Israel on the only part of the middle east without any oil.Originally Posted by kennas
Back to the Middle East, I am actually very interested in the root cause of the long time strife there. Is it religion? jobs?? Or a football team to barrack for???
Billbillhill said:1. Companies can't grow profits for ever. How long until overpopulation becomes a major issue.
2. Genes are very hard things to eliminate from a group of people.
3. Maybe (oil) its running out will be a blessing in disguise. One can only hope.
4. Chavez will have to make sure the wealth is fairly distributed or rule with a military fist, with the latter more likely.
5. Brazil - They own the worlds lungs which could be good leverage in a post carbon trading world.
You can bet that he and Iranian President Ahmad.. agree that USA are the problem, not the answer.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugo_Chávez
Hugo Rafael Chávez FrÃas (born July 28, 1954) is the current President of Venezuela. As the leader of the "Bolivarian Revolution," Chávez promotes his vision of democratic socialism, Latin American integration, and anti-imperialism. He is also an ardent critic of neoliberal globalization and U.S. foreign policy. etc
.........
Chávez focused considerably on Venezuela's foreign relations in 2004 and 2005 via new bilateral and multilateral agreements, including humanitarian aid and construction projects. Chávez has engaged, with varying degrees of success, numerous other foreign leaders, including Argentina's Néstor Kirchner, China's Hu Jintao, Cuba's Fidel Castro and Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
Speech to the United Nations - 2006 Chávez speech at the UN .
On 20 September 2006, Chávez delivered a speech to the United Nations General Assembly damning U.S. President George Bush.[82] In the speech Chávez referred to Bush as "the devil," adding that Bush, who had given a speech to the assembly a day earlier, had come to the General Assembly to "share his nostrums to try to preserve the current pattern of domination, exploitation and pillage of the peoples of the world." Although it was widely condemned by U.S. politicians and media, the speech was received with "wild applause" in the Assembly.
I disagree most vehemently.billhill said:Is a capatilist free market sustainable in venezuela. Unlike say cuba which has few natural resources, venezuelas resources may indeed bring down its capitalist free market. As great wealth enters the country, corruption will probably see the wealth very unevenly distributed and may eventually lead to an uprising by the people. Chavez will have to make sure the wealth is fairly distributed or rule with a military fist, with the later more likely.
One aspect of the Middle East question that I have been trying to get to the bottom of is the Shiite/Sunni sectarian conflict, which has been most prominate recently in Iraq.kennas said:Back to the Middle East, I am actually very interested in the route cause of the long time strife there. Is it religion? Or, is it people not having jobs?? Or a football team to barrack for???
chops_a_must said:I disagree most vehemently.
And Venezuela's philanthropy does not stop at it's own borders. It supplies heating fuel to poverty stricken residents in the US that it deems to be worse off than its own residents. And don't the US officials love that!
Depends on which field you are talking about. There's quite a lot of water flowing from some of those wells...2020hindsight said:3. Oil runing out? in the middle east? - would I be cynical if I suggested that the west is encouraging the middle east supplies to be drawn down, whilst they lock up their reserves for "a rainy day"? - I'm no expert on relative supplies btw.
careful kgee - you're taking on chops on his home turf, lol!.kgee said:Philanthrophy or taking the piss ????
I think he might have got that idea when he was chewing on those cocoa leaves
Buster said:Olbermann tears strips off Bush after his speech sending more troops into IRAQ..
Goes for about ten minutes, worth watching, the last five are scathing..
Bush's legacy: The president who cried wolf.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zRMdJY3ihQg
Cheers,
Buster
2020hindsight said:careful kgee - you're taking on chops on his home turf, lol!.
now you mention it - either or bothkgee said:is that taking the piss or chewing cocoa leaves
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_Africa
"Approximately 40% of all Africans are Muslims, in contrast to another 40% being Christians and 20% being non-religious or adherents to African religions. Despite all of the above religions having a long and rich history in the continent, they have provided sources of numerous conflicts, especially in countries where there is no clear majority, for example Sudan and Nigeria. Islam can be seen as spreading to Africa via passages through the Sinai Peninsula and Egypt and well as through Arab and Persian traders and sailors. Despite its large contribution to the make up of the continent, Islam is predominantly concentrated in North Africa and, to a lesser extent West Africa & East Africa. This has provided an increasing difference between the culture and laws of different parts of Africa.
http://nickbrowne.coraider.com/2007/01/flash-point.html
I'm getting a bad feeling in my water about developments in the horn of Africa. What I worry about is the correlation of conflicts there with Moslem/Christian tension as the whole continent grows ever more segragated along religious lines.
Whether or not it is strictly correct, it is certainly tempting to view Ethiopia's intervention in Somalia as a fight between an ancient Christian country and the Council of Islamic Courts.
I've read that Africa is about 40% Muslim and 40% Christian, with the Muslims concentrated in the North, and the Christians clustered in the South.
.... Amazingly in1900 there were about 9 million Christians in all of Africa, but by the year 2000 that number had grown to 380 million.
What's going to happen when that demographic tidal wave from sub Saharan Africa starts colliding with a radicalised post 9/11 North?
2020hindsight said:Since I mentioned a third option for oil as Nigeria, I enclose the following stats on Muslem / Christian ratios in Africa:- Nigeria for instance is 50-50.
what choice but to become friends !!
Africa is an interesting beast as far as religion and culture is concerned.2020hindsight said:Since I mentioned a third option for oil as Nigeria, I enclose the following stats on Muslem / Christian ratios in Africa:- Nigeria for instance is 50-50.
what choice but to become friends !!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?