- Joined
- 8 June 2008
- Posts
- 12,423
- Reactions
- 18,086
because I strongly and most sensible people I think should also believe that the so called perpetrators were 2 and not 3 and a bit of distinction could have saved a victim ,not to say the neighbour..we will never know for the later.He is dead, whether by the three or as collateral damage, doesn't change the fact I don't understand why there is so much emphasis put on saving the perpetrators, while risking more lives.
I am not soft heart but thinking instead of going gun blazing can help.Also in a group, you keep one alive if you really want to understand why what and find associates...but killing all is also a convenient way to ensure one story only
Europe is used to that: soon it is all these antivax, neo nazi, we should get a license for a carving knife etc etc etc
Killing a perpetrator why not.... but rapist or killers of unharmed victims walk away after 5 to 10 y not to say no jail if they are speeding a stolen car into innocent bystanders.
1 law for some, another for the "Force"; and if I kill an home invader, I go to jail, a given!
anyway, we will not remake that society, and this story will be milked at nauseum...