Connecting "unbiased" with "someone from the left" is a pretty myopic viewpoint and merely adds to my claim about sensationalism. ThanksSo in other words, someone from the left?
It's not a beat up, free speech comes with the caveat that there is no call to violence. Whoever crosses that line should be called out. This panel was called out, plain and simple.
There you go... non endorsement.The ABC usually flogs excerpts of Q&A on their shows the day after , but I haven't seen any for this show.
Yeah only after everyone in Australia (except the lunatic left complained about it).There you go... non endorsement.
It's probably because they are investigating if the content violated editorial standards
The real question isSounds like a load of sensationalist bull to me.
Gimme a viewpoint from an unbiased broadcaster with credibility and I'll listen
Couldn't care less what Andrew Bolt thinks.
The real question is
Are these facts or not, if these are facts which i truly believe they are, i have seen no denial, then there should be lawsuit engage in the same way there would be if a white supremacist were to say similar
https://www.news.com.au/national/ab...e/news-story/873e5b6507bd77dfd121eb10d7e39b1a
ABC pulls Q&A episode over provocative language after launching investigation
An episode of Q&A has been pulled off all ABC platforms after complaints about high-profile feminists who “called for endorsed violence”.
The ABC has pulled an episode of Q&A from all its platforms, which featured panellists that “used offensive language and called for endorsed violence”.
Managing director David Anderson said the broadcaster would look into whether the program’s most recent episode, which aired on Monday and featured a panel of high-profile feminists, breached the broadcaster’s editorial standards.
Mr Anderson said the ABC acknowledged the program was provocative in regard to the language used and some of the views presented.
“Q&A has always sought to tackle difficult issues and present challenging and thought-provoking content,” he said.
“However, I can understand why some viewers found elements of this episode confronting or offensive.”
Priceless, just priceless.
In 2018 in the USA not one single right wing killing spree ....
Same here, and same with current affairs programs, 'cept when twitter goes off about something. I'll go and see the footage.I don't know about anyone else on here, but I gave up watching any news about 10 years ago, it all became a platform for journalists to pedal their beliefs no matter which bent they are.
As soon as it became 24/7 news coverage, anything remotely resembling news was gone. IMO
Time will tell but my prediction is that this time next year we'll have seen a major change and a far more pragmatic approach being taken. Those inciting violence or taking offense for the sake of being offended will be cast off by those seeking actual progress.
My argument isn't about whether they are facts or not.The real question is
Are these facts or not, if these are facts which i truly believe they are, i have seen no denial, then there should be lawsuit engage in the same way there would be if a white supremacist were to say similar
That would be a very good idea.Same here, and same with current affairs programs, 'cept when twitter goes off about something.
I'll go and see the footage.
I think most people couldn't give a crap about it.Yeah only after everyone in Australia (except the lunatic left complained about it).
Labor lost a lot of skin appealing to the fringes , although women in general are certainly not the fringes, the impression was that they were a protected species to Labor regardless of what they did or what their merits were compared to men. Likewise indigenous and LGBTI
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?