Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

The lunatic left

Jump to new
PZ99 said:
LOL @ Richo decrying political violence.

He might be hung, drawn and quartered by midnight in todays' political world but not in 1980 :p

He votes Liberal these days. Maybe copped a midnight visit the night before. Karma's a beech.

Ask Latham :p
Click to expand...
He was pretty toxic back then, yes.

But that doesn't take away the ABC appearing to endorse political violence from these psychiatric ward escapees. That's the point here, not Richo.
 
It might "appear" that way to a political bloggist like Keira Savage. Her previous post suggests the ABC "get together a panel of man-haters to promote violence against men"

If that's how she sees the ABC then I don't believe anything she writes.
 
This is the Right wing ....

Sadly ... Right wing.
Anything said about left is not holding a candle to this Trump Advisor !!



The White house is holy ground ... saying NO to Trump .. is saying no to god !!

This woman ... Trumps devoted follower and main advisor was Bennie Hinds girlfriend for some time. Bennie is even nuttier than her ...


Please speak in tongues like this nutjob.
Are all right wing people like this ?
It seems so.
 
wayneL said:
You'll forgive my confusion then if it seemed that you considered Richos and Keiras criticisms as illegitimate:thumbsdown:
Click to expand...
You're forgiven :)

I consider Keiras' criticisms as incorrect based on her political disposition.
I consider Richos' comments as hypocritical based on his past.

I don't consider the ABC giving airtime to lefty panelists as endorsing their views.

Just as I don't consider the ABC giving airtime to Alan Jones as endorsing his views.

Which is ironic given both views are remarkably similar when it comes to advocating violence :)
 
PZ99 said:
You're forgiven :)

I consider Keiras' criticisms as incorrect based on her political disposition.
I consider Richos' comments as hypocritical based on his past.

I don't consider the ABC giving airtime to lefty panelists as endorsing their views.

Just as I don't consider the ABC giving airtime to Alan Jones as endorsing his views.

Which is ironic given both views are remarkably similar when it comes to advocating violence :)
Click to expand...
I think that comparison may be further analysis. On the one side it seems rather metaphorical however on the side of the q&A panel it seems to be a direct and we'll call to violence.

for instance if I remarked that some set of news is going to blow someone away, that's not to be taking literally as blowing their head off, it is metaphorical.

the q and A's panel call to violence was only partially metaphorical but did contain some actual calls to violence in my opinion.
 
It's just typical of whipped up confected outrage by Newscorp to try to damage the ABC at every opportunity.... as well as any other news organisation. (Though the feminist do go too far.) It is Newscorps plan to create loyalty with their viewers and tie them to their network. Quite clever.

Of more worry is actual violence, a wine seller in East Brunswick asked a woman if she would like to enter his Cup sweep and was subsequently spat on in the face!
The call by the LBGQTI community to delete Margaret Court the greatest ever tennis player in terms of results from history!
The attack on the old lefty Leunig basically because he hit a raw nerve with a cartoon with women using their phone while pushing a pram and now he is a misogynist!
The attack today on the AGE crossword for having a word clue that was a derogatory name for women.
The attack on police horses at the mining rally as well as 4 policeman, two who entered up in hospital. This included women spitting on delegates.

Outrage has become the new normal. I really do think there are feminazis now.
I think social media is whipping up certain personality types into a frenzy. I have no answer for it.
Men are still constrained by society but women appear to have free reign.
 
Last edited:
Knobby22 said:
Outrage has become the new normal. I really do think there are feminazis now.
I think social media is whipping up certain personality types into a frenzy. I have no answer for it.
Men are still constrained by society but women appear to have free reign.
Click to expand...

I couldn't agree more.

The ABC is now a feminazi organisation for sure.

They got into outrage mode of Pauline Hanson's suggestion that some women lie in the Family Court. Shock horror, as if the little darlings would do such a thing. Basically every interview on that subject was with women, telling the women's view. Nothing from the other side at all.

The Drum is virtually dominated by women. They may have a token man on at times but they are usually feminists themselves who are under the thumb or don't get a proper look in.

Men are definitely second class in the ABC.
 
We rule the world .... white men ... typically racist under-educated and corrupt. MAGA 2020

Forget about any non christian .... or god forbid non white ... or woman or Asian.

I so love this thread. Pity the Christchurch guy who was a member of this site is not here to add his two cents worth.

Sorry just vomited even typing that one.
 
kahuna1 said:
We rule the world .... white men ... typically racist under-educated and corrupt. MAGA 2020

Forget about any non christian .... or god forbid non white ... or woman or Asian.

I so love this thread. Pity the Christchurch guy who was a member of this site is not here to add his two cents worth.

Sorry just vomited even typing that one.
Click to expand...

You are comparing apples with lemons.

Why is what I say wrong rather than talking about a separate issue?
(By the way, again I will defend the ABC)
 
Todays Herald Sun

Andrew Bolt: Calls for violence show ABC is out of control
You know the ABC has lost its impartiality when calls for political violence on a panel show go unchallenged. When will the Morrison Government hold the broadcaster to account, asks Andrew Bolt.

On Monday the ABC broadcast its most dangerous show yet. Why is it inciting political violence, including calls for killing and arson?

That Q&A show marks the ABC’s most open declaration of war against our culture.

Once again, Q&A was stacked with Leftist activists, this time including host Fran Kelly, despite the national broadcaster being required by law to be impartial.

Once again, Q&A had the foul language — lots of f-words — and anti-white racism that’s now common on an ABC that’s tipping into barbarity.

But on Monday the ABC went beyond crudity, bias and race-hate to actually spruik for political violence.

It started with this leading question, preselected by the show’s producers: “When trying to bring about significant change, when is aggression and violence a better option than assertiveness, strong arguments and modelling the behaviour you expect of others?”

The answer, in this democratic society, should be “never”. We must settle arguments peacefully, or else heads get broken and the most violent rule.

But on Q&A no fewer than four panellists seemed to defend or even recommend violence, with not one person objecting.

First was Ashton Applewhite, an “anti-ageism” activist: “There are many causes where people have resorted to violence as a way to finally break through and get heard and achieve what we need. And if that’s what it takes, that’s what it takes.”..

Mona Eltahawy, a militant feminist, suggested women should even kill men they believed were rapists: “Not the state, because I disagree with the death penalty … So I want women themselves (to kill).

“As a woman I’m asking, how many rapists must we kill until men stop raping us?”

A third panellist, feminist Jess Hill, defended Eltahawy’s call for murder: “I think if anyone is shocked by what Mona is suggesting, you just have to look back to history and a certain faction of the suffragettes in the earlier 20th century. They used violence.”

If that’s not incredible enough, the ABC had selected a fourth panellist who also defended political violence — Nayuka Gorrie, a race activist who identifies as Aboriginal.

In fact, Gorrie actually called for violence against non-Aboriginal Australians, who she claimed lacked morality and wanted to kill Aborigines: “We’ve tried for 230-plus years to appeal to the colonisers’ morality which doesn’t seem to exist …

“I think violence is OK because if someone is trying to kill you, there’s no amount of, ‘Oh, but I’m really clever’ … is going to save you, so, yeah, let’s burn stuff.”

And how did Fran Kelly respond to these calls for violence against an Australia variously described as anti-women, racist and murderous?

Like this: “That’s a really good moment to go to our next question.”

Kelly was too much a coward to confront them. Or is there a bigger picture? Is the ABC now so hostile to the Australian culture that it welcomes violence against it — if only to provoke a white backlash it can then denounce as “racist”?

In particular, does it kind-of want Aboriginal radicals to “burn stuff”?

Consider: in March, the final episode of the ABC’s Get Krack!n comedy starred two Aboriginal actresses who screamed “Burn this place to the ground!” as they smashed the set.

One, ABC playwright Nakkiah Lui, shrieked “f--- whitey” and “I s--t on your colonisation” as she pretended to defecate on a cushion printed with a white woman’s face.

And last Sunday, the ABC kept that “burn stuff” meme going in the latest episode of Total Control, in which Deborah Mailman plays an Aboriginal politician confronting a white society that’s painted as vicious and racist.

Sunday’s episode ends with Mailman telling an Aboriginal man: “You’ve heard of divide and rule … They’ve been doing that to us for 200 years.”

Rome, she tells the man, was “burned to the ground”.

She then hands him a can of petrol and a lighter: “So why don’t you do what needs to be done and I swear on my mum’s grave, I will make the c---s pay.”

Is the ABC mad? Is it trying to stir up a race war?

Yes, I’m for free speech. I don’t want any of these women — note, they’re all women — banned or jailed.

But I certainly don’t want them given a platform, unchallenged, on a national broadcaster that I must pay for. Nor should Australians have to subsidise an ABC that broadcasts calls for the violent destruction of their society.

So when will the Morrison Government hold the ABC to account? Or defund a broadcaster that’s totally out of control?

276
 
It will be self resolving, when the majority are forced to accept extreme views of minorities, in the end the minorities go too far and the majority reject their views.
IMO the problem will be, a lot of the good work the left have done, will be thrown out with the bath water.:2twocents
 
bigdog said:
Todays Herald Sun

Andrew Bolt: Calls for violence show ABC is out of control
You know the ABC has lost its impartiality when calls for political violence on a panel show go unchallenged. When will the Morrison Government hold the broadcaster to account, asks Andrew Bolt.

On Monday the ABC broadcast its most dangerous show yet. Why is it inciting political violence, including calls for killing and arson?

That Q&A show marks the ABC’s most open declaration of war against our culture.

Once again, Q&A was stacked with Leftist activists, this time including host Fran Kelly, despite the national broadcaster being required by law to be impartial.

Once again, Q&A had the foul language — lots of f-words — and anti-white racism that’s now common on an ABC that’s tipping into barbarity.

But on Monday the ABC went beyond crudity, bias and race-hate to actually spruik for political violence.

It started with this leading question, preselected by the show’s producers: “When trying to bring about significant change, when is aggression and violence a better option than assertiveness, strong arguments and modelling the behaviour you expect of others?”

The answer, in this democratic society, should be “never”. We must settle arguments peacefully, or else heads get broken and the most violent rule.

But on Q&A no fewer than four panellists seemed to defend or even recommend violence, with not one person objecting.

First was Ashton Applewhite, an “anti-ageism” activist: “There are many causes where people have resorted to violence as a way to finally break through and get heard and achieve what we need. And if that’s what it takes, that’s what it takes.”..

Mona Eltahawy, a militant feminist, suggested women should even kill men they believed were rapists: “Not the state, because I disagree with the death penalty … So I want women themselves (to kill).

“As a woman I’m asking, how many rapists must we kill until men stop raping us?”

A third panellist, feminist Jess Hill, defended Eltahawy’s call for murder: “I think if anyone is shocked by what Mona is suggesting, you just have to look back to history and a certain faction of the suffragettes in the earlier 20th century. They used violence.”

If that’s not incredible enough, the ABC had selected a fourth panellist who also defended political violence — Nayuka Gorrie, a race activist who identifies as Aboriginal.

In fact, Gorrie actually called for violence against non-Aboriginal Australians, who she claimed lacked morality and wanted to kill Aborigines: “We’ve tried for 230-plus years to appeal to the colonisers’ morality which doesn’t seem to exist …

“I think violence is OK because if someone is trying to kill you, there’s no amount of, ‘Oh, but I’m really clever’ … is going to save you, so, yeah, let’s burn stuff.”

And how did Fran Kelly respond to these calls for violence against an Australia variously described as anti-women, racist and murderous?

Like this: “That’s a really good moment to go to our next question.”

Kelly was too much a coward to confront them. Or is there a bigger picture? Is the ABC now so hostile to the Australian culture that it welcomes violence against it — if only to provoke a white backlash it can then denounce as “racist”?

In particular, does it kind-of want Aboriginal radicals to “burn stuff”?

Consider: in March, the final episode of the ABC’s Get Krack!n comedy starred two Aboriginal actresses who screamed “Burn this place to the ground!” as they smashed the set.

One, ABC playwright Nakkiah Lui, shrieked “f--- whitey” and “I s--t on your colonisation” as she pretended to defecate on a cushion printed with a white woman’s face.

And last Sunday, the ABC kept that “burn stuff” meme going in the latest episode of Total Control, in which Deborah Mailman plays an Aboriginal politician confronting a white society that’s painted as vicious and racist.

Sunday’s episode ends with Mailman telling an Aboriginal man: “You’ve heard of divide and rule … They’ve been doing that to us for 200 years.”

Rome, she tells the man, was “burned to the ground”.

She then hands him a can of petrol and a lighter: “So why don’t you do what needs to be done and I swear on my mum’s grave, I will make the c---s pay.”

Is the ABC mad? Is it trying to stir up a race war?

Yes, I’m for free speech. I don’t want any of these women — note, they’re all women — banned or jailed.

But I certainly don’t want them given a platform, unchallenged, on a national broadcaster that I must pay for. Nor should Australians have to subsidise an ABC that broadcasts calls for the violent destruction of their society.

So when will the Morrison Government hold the ABC to account? Or defund a broadcaster that’s totally out of control?

276
Click to expand...

I didn't see that, I knew it was going to be a feminist whinge, but that is over the top.


Ita should be raked over the coals for allowing such a biased panel.
 
Sounds like a load of sensationalist bull to me.

Gimme a viewpoint from an unbiased broadcaster with credibility and I'll listen :)

Couldn't care less what Andrew Bolt thinks.
 
PZ99 said:
Sounds like a load of sensationalist bull to me.

Gimme a viewpoint from an unbiased broadcaster with credibility and I'll listen :)

Couldn't care less what Andrew Bolt thinks.
Click to expand...

So in other words, someone from the left?

It's not a beat up, free speech comes with the caveat that there is no call to violence. Whoever crosses that line should be called out. This panel was called out, plain and simple.
 

Similar threads

UMike
Real Rukshan
2
Replies
23
Views
1K
UMike
UMike
wayneL
The 2024 Apocalypse
Replies
10
Views
881
Knobby22
Knobby22
wayneL
The future of... The future?
Replies
3
Views
534
qldfrog
qldfrog
wayneL
The Price of Liberty
Replies
9
Views
983
wayneL
wayneL
basilio
Impact of a Labor/Greens/Teal parliament
2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
Knobby22
Knobby22
Top