- Joined
- 16 June 2005
- Posts
- 4,281
- Reactions
- 6
Who do you suggest should be Ms Gillard's replacement then, Sails?
I'll say again that I don't think it's just to do with the leader but way more to do with their woeful policy attempts.
Speaking for the first time on the issue, Mr Hawke said Mr Turnbull approached him on November 6, 1999, at Sydney's Marriott Hotel following the referendum's defeat.
Mr Hawke said yesterday he remembered the conversation clearly. Mr Turnbull told him: "Bob, the only thing I can do now is join the Labor Party.'
So agree. He has been excellent and should have had more prominent positions. Even now, he's unafraid to say what he thinks about anthropogenic climate change.Enjoy your retirement Sen Nick Minchin, you did good.
To think that one extra vote would have seen this chameleon as Coalition leader. Enjoy your retirement Sen Nick Minchin, you did good.
And so, in a cruel irony of the election slogan, we continue 'Moving Backwards Together'. Berlin Wall East Germany is the template ordained for us.
We will become an even greater laughing stock around the world - the country that took huge advantages and put it all 'up against the wall', for the sake of an outdated school blazer ideology, and junior high school economics.
Never trusted him and for good reason
From a purely pragmatic point of view, isn't he absolutely right on both counts?Minchin was also pro tobacco on the basis that it was a persons freedom of right to smoke. He raised this publicly a number of times.
He also pointed out that it save the government money people dying earlier of lung cancer and heart attacks and not being a cost to the system later in life.
As far as I'm aware, he'd have no interest in being classified as a humanist.As some one elected to serve the interests of his electorate it sort of rubbed him out as a humanist and as been trust worthy socially wise IMHO hence my line.
It's a pretty scary thought. We can, I suppose, only hope that the government and the coalition will vote together to dispense with the Greens' more outlandish proposals.Apparently, in a matter of days the Senate will become a plaything of the Greens, courtesy of balance of power in their own right.
Wonder what shade of Green the Gillard Gummint will turn?
...As some one elected to serve the interests of his electorate ...
READERS have overwhelmingly given Julia Gillard the thumbs down on almost every measure in her first year as PM.
An estimated 20,000 readers of News Limited mastheads across the country - including news.com.au - gave Ms Gillard a resounding "D" for her performance on almost every important issue, one year after she took the mantle as Australia's first female Prime Minister.
The interactive report card, rating her performance on an A-D scale, shows Ms Gillard has precious little support for her handling of the mining tax, asylum seekers and the carbon tax.
In Julia's defenceFit to be Prime Minister of Australia?
Tony Winsdor has declared that he would like to "do something about this issue irrispective of whether it kills him at the polls or not". That's his own words.
FAIL "D" on Juliar Gizzards Report Card
http://m.news.com.au/TopStories/pg/0/fi762782.htm;jsessionid=9C759D2E37BC7D11B18F7B710BA081D4
He (Lawson) dismisses as complete nonsense the argument that Australia has a special responsibility as a carbon intensive economy and big coal producer to show global policy leadership.
If China wants to develop and wants to increase productivity through, among other things, increasing electricity output capacity and has been building coal fired power stations and wants to import the coal to fuel them from Australia, I think you would be mad if you didn't supply it.
Lawson sees continuing strong demand for Australian coal despite promises by China and India to reduce their energy intensity, calling the pledges 'cover'.
Lawson dismisses as economic illiteracy claims of a green jobs boom powered by renewables that will mop up unemployment from the structural adjustment to a low carbon economy, recruiting one of the great classical liberals to back his case.
"The French 19th century economist Frederic Bastiat said you might as well go round breaking windows saying you're creating jobs for glaziers.
What you've got to be concerned about are jobs in the economy as a whole and you don't create jobs in the economy as a whole by promoting something that is wholly uneconomic and has to be subsidised."
Lawson has strong views about what decarbonisation means.
"The plain fact is the total economy will be harmed.
A lot of these green jobs will be in China. The Chinese can see there is a market in the West for solar panels and other things so they are producing them very much more cheaply. Insofar as there are jobs they will be there, not in the consuming countries.
Julia Gillard regularly points to British Prime Minister David Cameron's environmental plans to embarrass the Coalition, but Lawson says Tory backbenchers are increasingly uncomfortable and indeed hostile to policies that are being proposed on the climate change front, which mean higher energy costs, which are bad for consumers.... and bad for British industry.
He points out Cameron and his ministers have a Plan B. "The government has said it will review the matter in January 2014 in the light of what other European countries are doing and this is clearly a get out clause, this is clearly new and it was clearly put in at the behest of the Treasury as both the Treasury and Treasury ministers are very concerned at the cost of going it alone".
A FUZZY reception, just half of the promised channels, digital set-top boxes and antennas that don't work, and hundreds of dollars in extra, out-of-pocket expenses. Welcome to the future of watching television in NSW.
Congratulations Gillard, you have now put our Chinese exports under threat and have been labelled an 'unstable government'.
Nice work, anything other industry you clowns want to pull down?
http://sl.farmonline.com.au/news/nationalrural/livestock/cattle/landmark-looks-to-nz/2209006.aspx
lol what industry will get the 'Gillard touch' next?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?