Trainspotter, spot on.....and another wee hint why the banks dont want your term deposit as security for a mortgage......they need to maximise their earnings, and require an asset that increases with inflation over time....
or to put it another way....that does not devalue..
cause rather than house prices going up as the 'crowd' understands.....its the reverse....the devaluation of the dollar...that is behind it....
thats why the banks prefer to lend over other asset classes, or risk it with derivatives, anything but reliance on your cash deposit to generate a return...
cause the cash deposit keeps losing its value, bit by bit, every day, and has less buying power against inflation...
most home loans have an average life of about 15 years....thats when people pay them out....not the initial 25-30 years as the contract states...
so if a bank expects to lend against an asset that covers a decade or more, it really wants to be able to recover any debt on a current dollar basis after inflation...
it will not get that security from cash...cash will be worth less than half the value after 15 years....
http://reiv.com.au/home/inside.asp?ID=162&nav1=1226&nav2=162
Stock levels are so high that there have only been three months
with more auctions, October 2007, December 2007 and 2009, all in
spring when around 8-900 auctions over the weekend are a regular
feature.
NO
You obviously cannot understand what I am saying. The asset does not matter, it is the fact that the bank mortgages it readily that matters. As long as the bank has rights to the asset, it does not matter what it is, and as a previous poster outlined, you can get 100% LVR for cash. This confirms your original post misleading.
Banks need to approve sale of a car under finance.
So are you saying that a car is a good investment?
Diagnosis: myopia
It is easier to get a loan against a house, but that does not make a house a better asset to take a loan out against, just more convenient.
Buying at the top Robots? It certainly looks like it.
This is from your mentor, Enzo:
given the unseasonably high number of auctions this
May. Stock levels are so high that there have only been three months
with more auctions, October 2007, December 2007 and 2009, all in
spring when around 8-900 auctions over the weekend are a regular
feature.
does not sound like much of a good investment to me....
I lend the bank some cash and they pay me about 5%...at top rates, they lend me back the same money and charge me 7%......
YES!
You are obvioulsy not explaining it well enough for me to understand. You also obviously missed this post from me "OK OK OK ...... I might have fudged the FULL STOP bit. YES banks will take a "lien" over cash and shares. My big sorry to all and sundry. BUT they will freeze the asset so therefore it is no longer liquid"
Where in blue blazes did I say a car is a good investment or even try to suggest this?
Got to agree with you there Kincy. Only if the ATO allowed that loss to be offset against other income, would it be a fantastic investment
Interest rate rises have bitten early when compared to the long rising phase pre GFC.This is a little interesting. I've merged two of REIV's graphs, Quarterly Median(5yr) and Finance Commitment on Secured Housing(5yrs, sourced from ABS). I've lined up the time axis as close as I can as they seem to be reported one month different from each other.
cheers
Interest rate rises have bitten early when compared to the long rising phase pre GFC.
It will get very interesting if the RBA has to keep responding with higher interest rates to contain inflation.
[/B]
what a classic, so if can claim the loss against income, "CASH" becomes a fantastic investment, Oh Yeah
What I need to research next is how much exposure our banks have to marginal loans as a percentage, any pointers ?
Cash is a fantastic investment.
You just need plenty of shares and a lot of property to go with it
You are correct, housing is an excellent investment, but always beware the investor who puts all their eggs in the one basket.
Housing has to stop somewhere, but when it happens the people who have only 40% or so of their value in it ride it out much more nicely than those who are highly geared and exposed to an ever increasing bubble.
hello,
whys that?
thankyou
robots
Housing has to stop somewhere
The current cash rate of 4.5% is regarded as neutral by the RBA from a borrower's perspective.Very worrying indeed,
Looking at official RBA data the cash rate is still at the lower level of the 4-8% band, just lifted from a historically low level. I’m also very concerned that many won’t have much room to maneuver as rates do have to go up further.
A likely contributing factor to the rise in household interest expense relative to household income over the same period.Another phenomena that has gained momentum over the past decade is the funding of big ticket items via the family home, things like cars, holidays, kitchens, boats ect. ect. So it’s good and well to say that the banks will only lend against property at favorable rates but are they really doing you a favour ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?