- Joined
- 24 May 2009
- Posts
- 1,576
- Reactions
- 1,453
Did a tour through NZ and I was fascinated by the rebuild of Napier (which I think took around 2 years including a worldwide study of suitable architecture) and I then went onto the Christchurch which still had large areas still in ruins many years after the event. Clearly the two disasters had their differences in repair, but I think the administrators / regulators have a LOT to answer for in Christchurch. Hey how about some regulations on the timeliness of the regulators.It was a bit of a nightmare in NZ after the Christchurch EQ red tape slowed rebuilding, insurance pay outs took years, labour to rebuild was scarce.
Napier has excellent Art Deco architecture well worth a stay.
Post these dreadful bushfires I sincerely hope that relief is rapid and that a better solution on building requirements in fire prone areas is done QUICKLY. I fear a confusing muddle of regulators wasting a lot of time and resources coming up with a disparate range of confusing laws and bylaws differing from one shire to the next. Meanwhile the insurance companies will resolve their issues within weeks by upping insurance costs across the board and apply further strangulation on claimable events, while at the same time drag their feet to pay out claims.