Luke
My apologies.
Im confused.
Clearly then you have taken these trades with "other techniques" could you explain these in addition to your labelled charts?
I LIKE TECH/A
my bad i didnt mean correction, force of habbit saying that, yeah that software is not the greatest.
No its not feel, its analysis using many theories and past and current price patterns, candlestick analysis, etc tried and proven.
you show me your gaurenteed trading strategy though tech.
i have seen nothing but critisim from you so far, show me how great you are.
Im happy for you to show me anything useful. i can sit back and critise quite well.
More popcorn and back to the lounge for me
if it can be used to predict market action.
So far in the context of this 'debate', Boggo's input seems quite reasonable.
So far as the 'debate' has raged on, I'm yet to understand what the debate is actually about. I thought a debate on a topic was at least 2 sides debating whether the EW principle is firstly: valid (eg 5 waves up 3 waves down in it's basic form) and secondly: if it can be used to predict market action.
Since there have been several good books on EW, I'm kinda expecting those that seem intent on proving EW doesn't exist to provide evidence that a 5/3 structure doesn't exist at all. It's also kinda amusing that many in this forum trade by looking for breakouts or certian patterns that occur, which is exactly what EW teaches.
So far in the context of this 'debate', Boggo's input seems quite reasonable.
Well i have shown three charts which i think have elliot potential, lets see if it plays out.
Im sure there are many more that can be identified. its not rocket science.
uh?
showing one winning trade that shows no exit , shows no proof of still holding .......for all we know he sold out for a loss .......
and to be honest i pay no notice to many of the broker statements posted here as it has been shown to be falsified very easily in the past
how about some real time entrys/exits. they speak
and geez . showing 1 winning entry ? from a while back to prove that he used EW ? .........spare me cuz.......... i can post 45 winning entrys to prove i didnt use EW and merely used support resistance bounce trades .
boggo,s input regarding proving EW means squat in my book
no offense boggo but thats my 2 cents as you have had yours in the past
OWG glad you dropped in. The discussion is not about "evidence that a 5/3 structure doesn't exist at all". Especially after its played out.
Its about whether its actually used successfully to trade by the gurus that pimp it. Especially the endlessly complex application that seems to be hopelessly lost in the idea rather than the real application.
You are probably right nun, all this EW stuff is a waste of having to actually do some homework, I am just gonna go long where you see a short from now on
https://www.aussiestockforums.com/forums/showpost.php?p=472368&postcount=2024
https://www.aussiestockforums.com/forums/showpost.php?p=472372&postcount=2025
No offense taken nun
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?