The Conspiracy Theory thread

[Smurf1976]

This is profoundly ridiculous. Something absolutely stinks about this whole thing, but it was not faked. A bystander got a bullet in the head FFS.

The USA - a country where the right to be shot is often confused with freedom.

 

[investor13]

The USA - a country where the right to be shot is often confused with freedom.

the term freedom is also a conspiracy also

 

[qldfrog]

Were you not surprised to learn about the death of the uk billionaire and his mate in 2 unrelated accidents within a week, the week following their legal victory against.big data?
I asked chatgpt
I knew it was not impossible to be just rogue event but

Query
What is the probability of 2 british citizens unrelated, but knowing each other, to die accidentally within the same week
Answer

To calculate the probability of two unrelated British citizens who know each other both dying accidentally within the same week, we need to consider several factors, including:

1. **Accidental death rate**: The overall probability of an individual dying accidentally within a week.
2. **Population size**: The size of the population we are considering, which would be the population of the UK.
3. **Relationship between the individuals**: They are unrelated but know each other, so we assume independence in their death probabilities.

### Step 1: Accidental Death Rate
The accidental death rate in the UK is a small fraction. According to the Office for National Statistics (ONS) data, accidental deaths accounted for about 1 in 20 deaths in the UK. In terms of probability, it’s a very small number on a weekly basis.

### Step 2: Weekly Probability of Accidental Death
Let’s assume the annual accidental death rate in the UK is around 1 in 10,000 (this is a rough estimate). Therefore, the probability of an individual dying accidentally in a given week would be:

\[
P(\text{accidental death in a week}) = \frac{1}{10,000} \times \frac{1}{52} \approx 1.9 \times 10^{-6}
\]

### Step 3: Joint Probability for Two Individuals
Since the deaths are independent events:

\[
P(\text{both die accidentally in the same week}) = P(\text{accidental death}) \times P(\text{accidental death}) = \left(1.9 \times 10^{-6}\right)^2 \approx 3.6 \times 10^{-12}
\]

### Step 4: Considering Population and Relationships
However, this probability applies to a specific pair. In a population, there are many pairs of individuals who know each other, so the overall probability that *any* two such individuals might die in the same week might be higher when considering the entire population. But without specific data on the number of pairs of people who know each other, it's difficult to compute this exactly.

### Conclusion
For two specific, unrelated individuals who know each other, the probability of both dying accidentally within the same week is extraordinarily low, around \( 3.6 \times 10^{-12} \). This calculation assumes the accidental death rate is as estimated and that the deaths are independent events. The exact probability would vary with more detailed demographic data.

3.6* 10e-12
Hummmm

 

[moXJO]

Were you not surprised to learn about the death of the uk billionaire and his mate in 2 unrelated accidents within a week, the week following their legal victory against.big data?
I asked chatgpt
I knew it was not impossible to be just rogue event but

Query
What is the probability of 2 british citizens unrelated, but knowing each other, to die accidentally within the same week
Answer

To calculate the probability of two unrelated British citizens who know each other both dying accidentally within the same week, we need to consider several factors, including:

1. **Accidental death rate**: The overall probability of an individual dying accidentally within a week.
2. **Population size**: The size of the population we are considering, which would be the population of the UK.
3. **Relationship between the individuals**: They are unrelated but know each other, so we assume independence in their death probabilities.

### Step 1: Accidental Death Rate
The accidental death rate in the UK is a small fraction. According to the Office for National Statistics (ONS) data, accidental deaths accounted for about 1 in 20 deaths in the UK. In terms of probability, it’s a very small number on a weekly basis.

### Step 2: Weekly Probability of Accidental Death
Let’s assume the annual accidental death rate in the UK is around 1 in 10,000 (this is a rough estimate). Therefore, the probability of an individual dying accidentally in a given week would be:

\[
P(\text{accidental death in a week}) = \frac{1}{10,000} \times \frac{1}{52} \approx 1.9 \times 10^{-6}
\]

### Step 3: Joint Probability for Two Individuals
Since the deaths are independent events:

\[
P(\text{both die accidentally in the same week}) = P(\text{accidental death}) \times P(\text{accidental death}) = \left(1.9 \times 10^{-6}\right)^2 \approx 3.6 \times 10^{-12}
\]

### Step 4: Considering Population and Relationships
However, this probability applies to a specific pair. In a population, there are many pairs of individuals who know each other, so the overall probability that *any* two such individuals might die in the same week might be higher when considering the entire population. But without specific data on the number of pairs of people who know each other, it's difficult to compute this exactly.

### Conclusion
For two specific, unrelated individuals who know each other, the probability of both dying accidentally within the same week is extraordinarily low, around \( 3.6 \times 10^{-12} \). This calculation assumes the accidental death rate is as estimated and that the deaths are independent events. The exact probability would vary with more detailed demographic data.

3.6* 10e-12
Hummmm

Yeah pretty suss all round. I'd look to unpack it but they were billionaires. They can go nuts with those flogs.

 

[qldfrog]

Yeah pretty suss all round. I'd look to unpack it but they were billionaires. They can go nuts with those flogs.

Actually, italy opening investigation on manslaughter .that expensive big unsinkable boat sank, the small one anchored next had no issue...
It would now be interesting to squeeze the driver of the vehicle who killed #2..
Unless he is "committed suicide" before police interview

 

[moXJO]

Actually, italy opening investigation on manslaughter .that expensive big unsinkable boat sank, the small one anchored next had no issue...
It would now be interesting to squeeze the driver of the vehicle who killed #2..
Unless he is "committed suicide" before police interview

Kiwi sailor. I find it hard for them to stuff up that monumentally.

 

[The Triangle]

Were you not surprised to learn about the death of the uk billionaire and his mate in 2 unrelated accidents within a week, the week following their legal victory against.big data?
I asked chatgpt
I knew it was not impossible to be just rogue event but

Query
What is the probability of 2 british citizens unrelated, but knowing each other, to die accidentally within the same week
Answer

To calculate the probability of two unrelated British citizens who know each other both dying accidentally within the same week, we need to consider several factors, including:

1. **Accidental death rate**: The overall probability of an individual dying accidentally within a week.
2. **Population size**: The size of the population we are considering, which would be the population of the UK.
3. **Relationship between the individuals**: They are unrelated but know each other, so we assume independence in their death probabilities.

### Step 1: Accidental Death Rate
The accidental death rate in the UK is a small fraction. According to the Office for National Statistics (ONS) data, accidental deaths accounted for about 1 in 20 deaths in the UK. In terms of probability, it’s a very small number on a weekly basis.

### Step 2: Weekly Probability of Accidental Death
Let’s assume the annual accidental death rate in the UK is around 1 in 10,000 (this is a rough estimate). Therefore, the probability of an individual dying accidentally in a given week would be:

\[
P(\text{accidental death in a week}) = \frac{1}{10,000} \times \frac{1}{52} \approx 1.9 \times 10^{-6}
\]

### Step 3: Joint Probability for Two Individuals
Since the deaths are independent events:

\[
P(\text{both die accidentally in the same week}) = P(\text{accidental death}) \times P(\text{accidental death}) = \left(1.9 \times 10^{-6}\right)^2 \approx 3.6 \times 10^{-12}
\]

### Step 4: Considering Population and Relationships
However, this probability applies to a specific pair. In a population, there are many pairs of individuals who know each other, so the overall probability that *any* two such individuals might die in the same week might be higher when considering the entire population. But without specific data on the number of pairs of people who know each other, it's difficult to compute this exactly.

### Conclusion
For two specific, unrelated individuals who know each other, the probability of both dying accidentally within the same week is extraordinarily low, around \( 3.6 \times 10^{-12} \). This calculation assumes the accidental death rate is as estimated and that the deaths are independent events. The exact probability would vary with more detailed demographic data.

3.6* 10e-12
Hummmm

Murder. For sure.

But who? The US government is too stupid to organize the murder of anyone anymore. Some scorned business partners?

 

[mullokintyre]

Murder. For sure.

But who? The US government is too stupid to organize the murder of anyone anymore. Some scorned business partners?

Pretty sure it was trump.
Mick

 

[Knobby22]

The great thing about Europe is that if you spread fake conspiracy theories you can be sued. Not by much but enough to clear the person's name and at relatively little cost.

Brigitte Macron sued and won. Good on her. Dumb people believe this sht.

Two women ordered to pay Brigitte Macron €8,000 for spreading transphobic rumors

The false claim that the French president’s wife was a transgender woman was propagated beyond France.

www.politico.eu

 

[qldfrog]

The great thing about Europe is that if you spread fake conspiracy theories you can be sued. Not by much but enough to clear the person's name and at relatively little cost.

Brigitte Macron sued and won. Good on her. Dumb people believe this sht.

Two women ordered to pay Brigitte Macron €8,000 for spreading transphobic rumors

The false claim that the French president’s wife was a transgender woman was propagated beyond France.

www.politico.eu

Could be easy to prove, don't you think...
Even a beach photo..
we might talk about that very case in 10y again.
I can just tell you that is probably assumed as a fact by 60% of the population from both right and left BTW.
But yes, how would they know, we know better here.lol
I could not care either way but was surprised to hear that coming from even Macron party supporters/ voters.
She he ? Lol would be in jail in Australia as a pedophile anyway. No argument there?

Probably actually true but hey:
Pfizer discovered a covid vaccine which worked and did not kill anyone,
co2 creates global warming,
Trump was mad while president and should have been removed while Biden is still in power and in full capacity today....
Do not believe all these conspiracy loonies....

 

[qldfrog]

The great thing about Europe is that if you spread fake conspiracy theories you can be sued. Not by much but enough to clear the person's name and at relatively little cost.

Brigitte Macron sued and won. Good on her. Dumb people believe this sht.

Two women ordered to pay Brigitte Macron €8,000 for spreading transphobic rumors

The false claim that the French president’s wife was a transgender woman was propagated beyond France.

www.politico.eu

And do not worry, with the new Aussie bill, i will be sent to jail and Joe fined if i say mRNA jabs are actually dangerous and of no use, or reveal that banks are not solvable or super is a scam..so i will never say it.
Your world is winning @Knobby22
Read Solyenitsyn the goulag archipelago
The Gulag Archipelago https://g.co/kgs/vCWfRps

 

[Knobby22]

Could be easy to prove, don't you think...
Even a beach photo..
we might talk about that very case in 10y again.
I can just tell you that is probably assumed as a fact by 60% of the population from both right and left BTW.
But yes, how would they know, we know better here.lol
I could not care either way but was surprised to hear that coming from even Macron party supporters/ voters.
She he ? Lol would be in jail in Australia as a pedophile anyway. No argument there?

Probably actually true but hey:
Pfizer discovered a covid vaccine which worked and did not kill anyone,
co2 creates global warming,
Trump was mad while president and should have been removed while Biden is still in power and in full capacity today....
Do not believe all these conspiracy loonies....

Beach photo wouldn't be good enough to convince people who believe everything they are told by professional liars.

Here they are anyway.

 

[qldfrog]

Beach photo wouldn't be good enough to convince people who believe everything they are told by professional liars.

Here it is anyway.

View attachment 184268

Thanks a lot, where did you find it,?
Note that i could not care less as France is a lost case and i am not involved anymore but nothing would surprise me.
Why?
Macron is gay or bi, former PM Attal , Macron's favorite is openly gay and nominated his boyfriend as foreign minister so what next
Do we agree there?
The official story is also that Macron was seduced aged 14 by this man or lady who was his drama teacher.
Do we still agree, facts?
So trans..why not and my french Macron voting in laws were quite adamant after my initial reluctance.
1h later, at least benefit of the doubt ..

 

[qldfrog]

Thanks a lot, where did you find it,?
Note that i could not care less as France is a lost case and i am not involved anymore but nothing would surprise me.
Why?
Macron is gay or bi, former PM Attal , Macron's favorite is openly gay and nominated his boyfriend as foreign minister so what next
Do we agree there?
The official story is also that Macron was seduced aged 14 by this man or lady who was his drama teacher.
Do we still agree, facts?
So trans..why not and my french Macron voting in laws were quite adamant after my initial reluctance.
1h later, at least benefit of the doubt ..

Had this talk one month ago...

 

[Knobby22]

Thanks a lot, where did you find it,?
Note that i could not care less as France is a lost case and i am not involved anymore but nothing would surprise me.
Why?
Macron is gay or bi, former PM Attal , Macron's favorite is openly gay and nominated his boyfriend as foreign minister so what next
Do we agree there?
The official story is also that Macron was seduced aged 14 by this man or lady who was his drama teacher.
Do we still agree, facts?
So trans..why not and my french Macron voting in laws were quite adamant after my initial reluctance.
1h later, at least benefit of the doubt ..

Don't be so gullible.

 

[qldfrog]

Don't be so gullible.

Gay, pedophilia are facts..so the rest can make sense especially when argued by people who have more on the line than me .and are on that wef stooge side...
But that is all right, i am just gullible with covid, weapon of mass destruction in Irak or c02 causing global warming.
There is gullible and absolute belief in official narrative, both are as stupid.
I do not know about Macron's partner but i know about co2 and COVID mRNA jabs
I will never believe any gov at face value anymore.

 

[qldfrog]

Don't be so gullible.

Look who is talking?Goes both way, have to go now..

 

[Knobby22]

Look who is talking?Goes both way, have to go now..

I apologise. My bad.

 

[qldfrog]

I apologise. My bad.

I do not want need apologies, i would much prefer you use the science and math background that i believe you have to work:
..not talking Macron's wife sex or moon landing here, but serious items destroying lives daily here:
like mRNA jabs net cost benefits
or a deeper thinking about what we are being told about co2 being the cause of man made planet warming...
Just science, looking at facts/data and questioning hypothesis assumptions inc previous experiments which should be the basis of scientific process.

 

[qldfrog]

Note:
Macron's case is anecdotal but Macron is a WEF young leader only pushed by let's call it deep state?
WEF training then private banker then pushed into government and politics: at a time socialist then own party and liberal all that in roughly a decade showing you how much manipulation is at work by the real powers..
Or maybe a really good self made man? Lol