Knobby22
Mmmmmm 2nd breakfast
- Joined
- 13 October 2004
- Posts
- 9,802
- Reactions
- 6,782
Lu is pretty correct. Look at the Age and SMH. Blacklisted by most of the banks for daring to report on them.
My god you're a drag Lu, can we crowd fund a one way ticket to Mars for you?
Well Fox is a good mainstream example about how to make money by telling half the story and avoiding things that their followers don't want to hear e.g. Trumps wife story about how she got into the USA and that degree she claimed (but didn't do).If you want to find out you need to go to another site.
If you go to the site right now you can see everything Trump is saying with no reporting of Clinton. Yes, I would say that is an example that proves your point.
Free media shows all the news. Unfortunately people are becoming more partisan and just want to see their bias confirmed. That goes for the left wing publications also. Forutantely there are still enough people who want to know the truth.
Actually when I lived in China I found AL Jezeera to be the best unbiased reporting I'd ever witnessed......
Yes, true.
http://www.ewg.org/research/asbestos-think-again/industry-hid-dangers-decadesMarch 4, 2004
Asbestos: Think Again: Industry hid dangers for decades
SOMETHING IN THE AIR: The asbestos document story
Nothing proves the culpability of the asbestos manufacturers in the death and injury of asbestos workers quite like internal documents from the companies themselves. These papers, just a handful of which we present here, prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the companies and their insurers knew the hazards of asbestos and concealed this information from workers for decades. More than any other piece of evidence, it is the companies' own internal papers that have convinced juries of citizens across the country that workers and their families deserve compensation to help them manage the severe and often fatal health consequences of working with asbestos.
but asbestos is something we're going to be getting rid of pretty much forever. A hundred years from now it will still be found in old buildings etc.
CIA, NATO and Swedish Military Plotted Regime Change in Sweden in 1980s
‘Heroes’ and victims of 80’s US disinformation provide clues to today’s Russian scare
To win the cold war President Ronald Reagan formed a secret ‘deception committee’ for a disinformation campaign against the USSR
On several occasions ‘disinformation’ put the world on the brink of nuclear war
The ‘Soviet’ U-boat scare that shook Sweden in the 80s was caused by US and UK subs that penetrated Swedish territorial waters disguised as Russian ones
Swedish military were fully aware of these operations but did not report to Prime Minister, Olof Palme
The number of Swedes believing in a Soviet threat increased fourfold
‘Dove’ Palme had no choice but to take anti-Soviet stance
He was assassinated the day before his trip to meet Gorbachev whom he saw as a like minded person
The 52 minutes documentary “Deception: The Methods of Reagan” by German director Dirk Pohlmann premiered last May on ‘ARTE’ the French/German highbrow channel. Broadcast late at night and early in the morning, it generated no reaction.
It has not been shown in Sweden, although it throws light on two of the most dramatic episodes in modern Swedish history – the Soviet U-boat scare of the 1980s that was suddenly repeated in 2014, and the assassination of the Swedish premier Olof Palme in 1986. This film is not a Hollywood thriller, but a sequence of stories told by people who have faces, names, titles and ranks.
Submarines and PSYOPs
Tunander's study of covert political structures goes back to his experience of high-profile submarine activities in Swedish archipelagos and naval bases in the 1980s. His books from the 1980s accepted the official view. In 1983, Swedish Prime Minister Olof Palme protested against the "Soviet intrusions". He was forced to cancel his policy and deep-freeze Sweden's diplomatic relations to Moscow.[17] In 1980, 8% of the Swedes viewed the Soviet Union as a direct threat and 33% considered the Soviets as hostile. After a stranded Soviet submarine in 1981 and primarily after a dramatic anti-submarine operation in 1982 with midget submarines inside Swedish naval bases, these figures changed to 42% and 83% respectively,[18] which forced Sweden to deep-freeze its Soviet ties.
However, in the 1990s, Tunander was told by U.S. and British officials that these operations were run by the U.S. and the U.K. In 2000, former U.S. Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger and former U.K. Navy minister Keith Speed stated on Swedish TV that their subs had operated "regularly" and "frequently" in Swedish waters to test Swedish defenses after navy-to-navy consultations.[19] This information was confirmed by British Chief of Defence Intelligence Air Marshal Sir John Walker.[20] Chairman of the NATO Military Committee Vigleik Eide, and Secretary General of NATO George Robertson added that these were not NATO operations but operations under national command (U.S. and U.K.).[21] This led to a Swedish Government inquiry under Sweden's former Washington Ambassador Rolf Ekéus with Ambassador Mathias Mossberg as Secretary and with Tunander as a civilian expert.[22] Tunander wrote a Swedish book Hårsfjärden (2001), articles for the Swedish Journal of War Sciences, the Zürich-based Parallel History Project,[23] and an English volume for the Frank Cass Naval History Series The Secret War against Sweden: US and British Submarine Deception in the 1980s (2004), which emphasized the submarines' role to change Swedish public opinion and foreign policy. Tunander argued that Soviet submarines might very well have entered Swedish waters, but the more visible operations were most likely PSYOPs decided by a U.S. "deception operation committee" chaired by CIA Director William Casey, and some of them were run by a CIA-Navy liaison office, National Underwater Reconnaissance Office, headed by Secretary of Navy John Lehman.[24]
I'm fairly sure some of us are descendants of a progenitor interstellar race. We share donor dna from humans so we could acclimate into earth's environment.
Humans are necessarily an altered state ape previously going through rapid evolutionary change to get to a stage where they are industrious workers for the hybrid aliens.
Of course the master race is Nordic which answers the questions of why they figure persistently in the progressive movements of civilisation and why the historical royal bloodlines around the world, especially Britain's, share a remnant dna that ape evolved humans don't have.
The current DNA experiments are the next step of modification in homo sapiens to keep them up to speed with the illuminati's needs.
is it not what DNA is???I was under the impression that our DNA is being altered by aliens who zip around abducting people and implanting them with micro chips that track them over generations,
I was under the impression that our DNA is being altered by aliens who zip around abducting people and implanting them with micro chips that track them over generations, and females are impregnated with alien sperm to produce a super race that will eventually dominate the planet.
Well, that's what I heard on Foxtel anyway.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?