This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

The Australian Greens party

Jump to new
Tink said:
Here is another one, the Greens
Click to expand...
Whilst I do not generally agree with churches and especially not on the subject of gay marriage, they most certainly do have a right to put their point of view forward so far as I am concerned.

Simply stating an opinion which differs from that of someone else is not valid grounds for defamation so far as I am concerned and is simply an unwarranted attack on free speech which diminishes all involved.
 

" She has now sent an email to supporters, asking for $20 donations.

"A crowdfunding campaign has been set up thanks to Emeritus Professor Simon Chapman AO and author Jane Caro, to help cover legal costs," the email states."

Sure he may have gone a bit far, but sometimes you have to fight fire with fire. She deserved it. Shame on Jane Caro and Simon Chapman for supporting such an unworthy cause.

Females are so much better at gaming the system and society. Men maybe physically stronger, but Women are much more cunning and manipulative.
 
Darc Knight said:
Females are so much better at gaming the system and society. Men maybe physically stronger, but Women are much more cunning and manipulative.
Click to expand...

They are pretty good at playing the defenceless weaker sex card when it suits them.
 
Sarah Hanson Young earns $200,000 a year from Taxpayers and won't pay her own legal fees.
 

Getup is also spam mailing me for support of a forced apology from David. It must be wonderful for them all, to have something, ex SSM, to get all indignant about.
 
Darc Knight said:
Sarah Hanson Young earns $200,000 a year from Taxpayers and won't pay her own legal fees.
Click to expand...

So what is she actually suing for ?

Does she deny she shags men ? She is divorced with a child, so she obviously does shag men, and even if she "puts it about" a bit, that's no big deal.

It's not as if she is being accused of doing anything vile.
 
If she is sueing for damage to reputation, she should really be sueing herself.

On the other hand, Leyonhjelm should thank her for the lift in profile, most of my mates now want to vote LD
 
SirRumpole said:
So what is she actually suing for ?

Does she deny she shags men ? She is divorced with a child, so she obviously does shag men, and even if she "puts it about" a bit, that's no big deal.

It's not as if she is being accused of doing anything vile.
Click to expand...

Its Feminism gone too far again, gone to domination. She's a bully!
Didn't she and her Daughter have a tax funded vacation awhile ago. Claimed it as work related coz they went on a Whale watching cruise at one stage. When pulled up on it she claimed she wouldn't be told what to do by white middle aged Men. Sounds like a rort with a Sexist response when pulled up on it.
 


What it does do is ...reinforce the belief that women aren't up to the task of being equal to men. Men don't run off to mummy when someone gives them an insult in parliament (well maybe some wilting flowers do, but defamation suits because of course lingo...really?)

Of course the counter is that men need to modify their behaviour and become more civilised like...well like Sarah is.
 
I understand SHY doesn't mind dishing it out in parliament. Equality has to be all the time, not just when it suits, such as when a politician of modest achievements seeks a little publicity, and a career path post-Senate
 
Tink said:
If you believe in -

LIFE - FAMILY - CHILDREN

Vote the Greens OUT!
Click to expand...

Greens popularity is in decline. They'll go the way of Don Chip, et al.

I still enjoy the press barking about Pauline as being a flash in the pan, but she would be an elder by now compared to the bums on seats around her.
 
They are certainly keeping a low profile ATM, still no one can blame them, much more fun to watch from the sidelines.
 
Richardo Luiji Di Natale. The Greens party leader who loves to tell us Aussies that we live on stolen land and our nation isn’t legitimate and that we should give it all back to the

Richardo Luiji Di Natale Owns a 50 acres of “stolen land” in Victoria's Otway Ranges. Not only does he own it. He failed to declare that he owned it when he entered politics. And he is required by law to declare it.
He claimed that he’d forgotten that he’d purchased his 2.3 million dollar property!
Like putting spare change in a draw, I suppose.

This “champion of human rights” and especially the rights of foreigners in Australia. Had two au pairs on his property. An au pair is a young foreign person, typically a woman, who helps with housework or childcare in exchange for food, a room, and some pocket money.

And Greens party leader. Richardo Luiji Di Natale. The champion of humanity, in his own mind, paid them a massive $3.75 an hour to help with his family. Mind you on top of Richardo Luiji Di Natale’s $283,632 plus bonuses and quirks per year from the tax payer.

He would also claim that massive $3.75 per hour for his nannies back on tax as he’s a mobile politician.
His ad for the au pair read …..
“family of four is looking for an extra pair of hands around the place to entertain the lads [the couple have two boys] and help with cooking and general domestic duties".
"Will take couples but weekly wage remains the same."
That’s $150 a week for two people. Or $1.88 an hour each.
 
Can't find anything via Google just yet but Wow
Always thought he was a loose cannon but this looks pretty bad. If true you'd think he has to resign as Leader.
 
bigdog said:
"Will take couples but weekly wage remains the same."
That’s $150 a week for two people. Or $1.88 an hour each.
Click to expand...

Live in , ie no rent or house payments, free food, power, light, use of family car ?

How much would all that add up to ?
 
The Greens should secede their “stolen land” from Australia and become a micro nation where their realm of fiction has more relevancy. It's a "novel" approach but it might just work
 
A relevant link and quote from the Guardian:

A spokesman for Senator Di Natale’s told Fairfax: “the farm was listed as a business interest from the time Richard was elected” and that by declaring income from the farm, he had met the requirements for declaring property in the register of senators’ interests.

https://www.presscouncil.org.au/document-search/adj-1693/
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Effects of the US election on the Australian economy and politics
Replies
2
Views
451
SirRumpole
Election 2025 + Preferential Voting
2
Replies
26
Views
1K
JohnDe
Impact of a Labor/Greens/Teal parliament
2 3
Replies
45
Views
3K
Knobby22
Gen Alpha
Replies
13
Views
818
moXJO
M
M
Trump/RFK vs Harris
2
Replies
25
Views
2K
So_Cynical
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...